Posted on 07/28/2002 1:17:17 PM PDT by scripter
MEN:
- A 1997 study in British Columbia found the life expectancy of men who engage in sodomy to be comparable to that of the average Canadian man in 1871. Researchers estimate that nearly half of the 20 year old men currently engaging in sodomy will not reach their 65th birthday.1
- Ninety-five percent or more of the AIDS infections among gay men result from receptive anal intercourse.2
- The risk of anal cancer "soars" by nearly 4,000% for men who have sex with men. The rate doubles again for those who are HIV positive. A Michigan homosexual newspaper admits there is no such thing as "safe sex" to prevent this "soaring" cancer risk. Condoms offer only limited protection.3 - Homosexual men face a significantly higher risk of HIV/AIDS, hepatitis, anal cancer, gonorrhea and gastrointestinal infections as a result of their sexual practices.4 - Men who engage in sodomy are 860% more likely to contract a sexually transmitted disease (STD), increasing up to 500% their risk of contracting HIV/AIDS. Men who commit acts of sodomy with men have large numbers of anonymous partners, which can result in rapid, extensive transmission of STDs. Control of STDs is a central component of HIV infection prevention in the United States; resurgence of bacterial STDs threatens national HIV infection prevention efforts.5 - Anal Human Papillomavirus (HPV) infection is nearly universal among HIV-positive homosexual or bisexual men and about 60% in HIV-negative men exhibiting the same sexual behavior.6 WOMEN: - Many innocent victims suffer the health consequences associated with sodomy as a result of blood transfusions, rape and having normal sexual relations with those who have committed unnatural relations with others. While men of all ages who commit sodomy with other men remain at an alarming risk, young bisexual men are said to be a significant "bridge" for HIV transmission to women.7 - Women who commit sex acts with other women face a significantly higher risk of bacterial vaginosis, breast cancer and ovarian cancer than heterosexual women.8 - The spread of Human Papilomavirus (HPV) is not prevented by condoms. The persons most susceptible to cancer associated with HPV are young women (under 20) and people who practice anal intercourse.9 - Women who engage in receptive anal sex are at a higher risk for contracting anal cancer. In fact, in the U.S. general population, anal cancer is more prevalent among women than men — between 1.5 and 2 times more common, perhaps because more women than men engage in receptive anal sex.10
| Sex Practice: | Potential Consequences: |
| 1. Close Body Contact | 1. Pubic lice 2. Scabies (mites) 3. Fungal Infections |
| 2. Performer of Oral Sex | 1. Oral gonorrhea 2. Oral lesions from herpes, HPV (warts), chancroid, lymhogranuloma venereum, or granuloma inguinale. 3. Nongonolococcal pharyngitis from chlamydia, other STD's 4. Syphilis 5. Hepatitis B 6. Enteric (intestinal) infections |
| 3. Receptive Anal Intercourse | 1. Traumatic proctitis 2. Rectal gonorrhea 3. Anal warts 4. HIV/AIDS 5. Nonspecific procitis (from chlamydia and other STDs) 6. Anorectal herpes 7. Anorectal syphilis 8. Hepatitis B 9. Rectal trichomoniasis 10. Lymphogranuloma venereum 11. Anorectal granuloma inguinale 12. Anorectal chancroid 13. Cytomegalovirus 14. Anorectal candidiasis |
| 4. Receptive Manual-Anal Intercourse | 1. Enteric (intestinal) infections |
| 5. Receiver of Oral Sex | 1. Physical abrasions 2. Bites 3. Herpes 4. Urethritis from various STDs |
| 6. Insertive Anal Intercourse | 1. Nongonococcal urethritis 2. Genital herpes 3. Molluscum contagiosum 4. Genital warts 5. Syphilis 6. Trichomoniasins 7. Epididymitis and/or proctitis 8. Fungal infections 9. Lymphogranuloma vencreum 10. Granuloma inguinale 11. Chancroid 12. Hepatitis B 13. HIV/AIDS |
| 7. Oral-anal Intercourse | 1. Enteric (intestinal) infections 2. Shigellosis 3. Campylobacter fetus (bacteria) 4. Enterogenic E. coli bacteria 5. Hepatitis (A, B, and others) 6. Amebiasis 7. Giardiasis 8. Salmonellosis 9. Enterobius vermicularis (parasite) 10. Oral warts 11. Oral gonorrhea 12. Syphilis 13. Lymphogranuloma venereum 14. Oral granuloma inguinale 15. Oral chancroid 16. HIV/AIDS 17. Herpes 18. Anorectal meningococcal infection |
1. International Journal of Epidemiology, Vol 26, 657-661, "Modelling the Impact of HIV Disease on Mortality in Gay and Bisexual Men."
2. Michael Fumento, "AIDS: Are heterosexuals at Risk?" Commentary 84, (November, 1987) pp. 22-23.
3. Between the Lines, "Anal Cancer and You," Sept. 29, 2000.
4. Medical Institute of Sexual Health, "Health Implications Associated with Homosexuality," 1999.
5. Centers for Disease Control, "Resurgent Bacterial Sexually Transmitted Disease Among Men Who Have Sex With Men," September 10, 1999.
6. Infectious Disease News, "Because of HPV, anal cancer screening indicated for certain high-risk groups," October, 1997
7. Manila Bulletin (Philippines), "Bisexuals Serve as 'Bridge' Infecting Women With HIV," July 30, 2000
8. Medical Institute of Sexual Health, "Health Implications Associated with Homosexuality," 1999.
9. WebMD Forum: "HPV and Cervical Cancer with John R. Diggs, Jr., M.D.," April 7, 2000.
10. Infectious Disease News, "Because of HPV, anal cancer screening indicated for certain high-risk groups," October, 1997
11. DG & Altman Ostrow, "Homosexual Behavior and Sexually Transmitted Diseases." New York: McGraw Hill, 1990. pp. 61-69.
I didn’t have the other two links, thanks. It’s disturbing to see “The late Dr. Haroian” on her link, pretty soon Socarides, Marmor and Spitzer aren’t going to be around anymore either to account for the 30 year ago decision and this travesty to science will become ancient history. There is solace in Soble’s new paper, it may not address the erroneous accounts in 1973, other than a quick mention of bias, but it does attack the “science” used by Spitzer’s packed committees and proves their analysis’s were wrong.
LG I’ve freep-mailed you my interest in you posting a thread on some of these new links, if you don’t think my conclusions are correct or if you don’t have the time I think I’ll just put these links up individually as threads starting with Soble’s. I’ll wait a little while in case you have not had time to respond to my last mail.
Ed, scrip, and LG I think the best way to resolve our space problem and preserve these links that may someday be in jeopardy of going away (i.e. Kalantar’s research paper) is to post these studies in their entirety and put the thread links on our home pages, that’s for what they were intended. Let’s use FR’s bandwidth instead of ours, thoughts?
I've had the same thoughts. Or if we merely post the text in their entirety as it's own thread and then keep an index or database of each article and it's related link on our home pages that may work as well. That's actually where I was going to dump my database of links, if not also post every link in the database every six months to keep it updated.
I'll try to post an example of what I mean today or tomorrow.
This is precisely the reason why a public health based argument will succeed. Smoking cigarettes reduces life expectancy by only six years, and look at all the measures that have been taken to curb cigarette use. But according to the International Journal of Epidemiology, homosexuals who engage in anal sex reduce their life expectancy by eight to 20 years.
If anal sex is a greater risk to public health than cigarette smoking, why aren't the same measures being used to curb its practice?
How about a tax?
Maybe $5.00 a "pack".
How about a campaign of public service announcements, of the same magnitude as the campaigns against cigarettes and illegal drugs?
How about a lawsuit by the Attorney General's office against NAMBLA, GLSEN and the other organizations that promote this destructive behavior?
I'd warrant that half of the 20 year old men currently engaging in sodomy are thinking "ow - this kinda hurts!".
Oh - I give up. Consider this my Opus.
Of course, gay apologists spin the huge gay-against-gay crime stat by reporting only that "violent crime rates against gays are higher than against straights," and letting the listener draw the false conclusion from that statement that the high rates are due to heteros engaged in "gay-bashing".
well it is the islamies that spread filth
Ixnay there. There's close body contact involved there, and it's the first thing mentioned. I guess we shouldn't even shake hands.
If sodomy is outlawed only outlaws will have sodomy...
(wait, that doesn't sound right....)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.