Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Our Species Mated With Other Human Species, Study Says
National Geographic ^ | March 6, 2002 | Hillary Mayell

Posted on 03/06/2002 7:38:41 PM PST by ValerieUSA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 241-254 next last
To: blam
the neandrethals supposedly had big noses, in addition to other body parts.

the caucasins from europe, which was the main home of the neandrethals have big noses (eg Roman nose), whereas the mongoloids and negroids have sort of small or flattened, 'pug' noses.

considering my dim memories of my early 20's, I am certain, if the europeans had discovered the wonders of the fermentation of grapes, they would certainly have mixed 'species'.

181 posted on 03/08/2002 3:41:44 AM PST by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: blam
I read that. Totally phony. The total dishonesty of evolution "science" is unimaginable. We have seen numerous fossils of Neanderthals and homo sapiens found nearby. They all show that they were distinct species. Homo sapiens and Neanderthal remained completely distinct while living as neighbors for tens of thousands of years without intermixing. The reason for this was long suspected, but just recently verified. Neanderthal and Homo Sapiens were totally different species, they could not produce progeny with each other. This was confirmed by two separate samples of DNA from Neanderthals found in two widely separate finds.
182 posted on 03/08/2002 4:40:45 AM PST by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre
The problem with the article is not in the definition of species. The problem is that it is complete bunk. We have no DNA of any humanoids other than Neanderthal. Therefore the "scientist" (better call him propagandist, or whore of evolution) who did this "study" had nothing to compare to. This is not science, it is fantasy. You cannot compare an apple to an orange if you never saw an orange.
183 posted on 03/08/2002 4:50:28 AM PST by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
Here's another example...


184 posted on 03/08/2002 4:57:39 AM PST by reagan_fanatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Liberty2112
I will never believe that my ancestors hung in trees.

What about Jesse Jackson?

185 posted on 03/08/2002 4:58:24 AM PST by Renatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: capitan_refugio, medved
Hey medved, I'll help you out with the Heinsohn literature. How's this?

Oh, wait. That doesn't seem to help much. Sorry.

186 posted on 03/08/2002 5:14:28 AM PST by cracker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Hobbes1; xsmommy; rikastrom
Caveman bump. And women, where are our sammiches, ugga ugga.
187 posted on 03/08/2002 5:17:37 AM PST by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
Let me be the first to evoke the name of: James Carville.

.your right...Carville is the missing link..

.

188 posted on 03/08/2002 5:19:42 AM PST by Clovis_Skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
i see you are one of the more recently..evolved... of the species...: )
189 posted on 03/08/2002 5:23:16 AM PST by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: cracker
Oh, wait. That doesn't seem to help much. Sorry.

It wouldn't help you much, I mean a debate between Heinsohn and Ev cochrane (you wouldn't understand it). As you might notice from one or two of the links I noted, those kinds of debates go on at Cambridge University and similar places. The only way anybody like yourself ever got into Cambridge University is in a glass jar as a bio specimen.

190 posted on 03/08/2002 5:25:40 AM PST by medved
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy
i see you are one of the more recently..evolved... of the species...: )

And what makes you say that?

191 posted on 03/08/2002 5:36:27 AM PST by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: gore3000
I won't argue the point with you, however, I believe the jury is still out. I lean toward the interbreeding theory.
192 posted on 03/08/2002 5:37:53 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic
re: #194

With some sharper teeth & leathery wings you might have the cryptozoological interdimensional Renocabra.

193 posted on 03/08/2002 9:22:47 AM PST by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic
Uh...#184, that is.
194 posted on 03/08/2002 9:23:57 AM PST by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: twigs
IIRC, one of the objections in comparing 'ancient' Neanderthal mDNA (mitochondrial DNA) to CURRENT human mDNA was that it was an apples-to-oranges comparison. In other words, if you had ancient human mDNA it would not compare well with current human mDNA, either (never mind any possible Neanderthal comparisons: a straight humnan-to-human comparison would not look right). Lo and behold, an ancient Aboriginal (Lake Mungo man?) mDNA was extracted and amplified and it showed his mDNA looks rather far off the beaten path compared with latter-day man. Gimme awhile and maybe I can locate the reference...
195 posted on 03/08/2002 10:16:49 AM PST by NukeMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: NukeMan
Here is one ref:
http://www.sciam.com/explorations/2001/012901human/

It's from Scientific American (and I know some of you can't stand that mag)...

They also make the point that even if Neanderthal mDNA is not in our current genetic makeup, other DNA might well be.

Here is another ref:
http://www.neanderthal-modern.com/genetic2.htm
196 posted on 03/08/2002 10:38:55 AM PST by NukeMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: gore3000
Doesn't all science start out as fantasy?
197 posted on 03/08/2002 10:44:41 AM PST by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre
Doesn't all science start out as fantasy?

Perhaps, but no one calls the stories of H.G. Wells science. Only evolutionists call fantasy science.

198 posted on 03/10/2002 4:10:04 AM PST by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: BurkeCalhounDabney
what planet did Carvel come from? Let's see...men are from Mars, Women from Venus...Carvel's from Uranus!!!!!!!
199 posted on 03/12/2002 11:51:01 PM PST by Madstrider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ValerieUSA; blam; FairOpinion; Ernest_at_the_Beach; SunkenCiv; 24Karet; 2Jedismom; ...
Thanks Val, I don't believe I'd seen this, and though it's pushin' three years old, I'm going to ping the list.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on, off, or alter the "Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list --
Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
The GGG Digest
-- Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)

200 posted on 10/05/2004 11:04:14 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("All I have seen teaches me trust the Creator for all I have not seen." -- Emerson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 241-254 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson