Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: twigs
IIRC, one of the objections in comparing 'ancient' Neanderthal mDNA (mitochondrial DNA) to CURRENT human mDNA was that it was an apples-to-oranges comparison. In other words, if you had ancient human mDNA it would not compare well with current human mDNA, either (never mind any possible Neanderthal comparisons: a straight humnan-to-human comparison would not look right). Lo and behold, an ancient Aboriginal (Lake Mungo man?) mDNA was extracted and amplified and it showed his mDNA looks rather far off the beaten path compared with latter-day man. Gimme awhile and maybe I can locate the reference...
195 posted on 03/08/2002 10:16:49 AM PST by NukeMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: NukeMan
Here is one ref:
http://www.sciam.com/explorations/2001/012901human/

It's from Scientific American (and I know some of you can't stand that mag)...

They also make the point that even if Neanderthal mDNA is not in our current genetic makeup, other DNA might well be.

Here is another ref:
http://www.neanderthal-modern.com/genetic2.htm
196 posted on 03/08/2002 10:38:55 AM PST by NukeMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson