Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MSNBC: Ari Fleischer To Blast Clinton Administration At 12:30
MSNBC | 2-28-02 | My Favorite Headache

Posted on 02/28/2002 7:30:09 AM PST by My Favorite Headache

Just heard a news break from Rick Sanchez saying the Bush administration is going to hold the Clinton administration responsible for pressing peace talks in a volatile situation that they knew would result in more violence against Israel beginning in 2000....more to follow during briefing.But apparently Ari is going to have something big to say on this and where the U.S. is going to go with the situation in Israel and the war on terrorism.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-296 next last
To: hang 'em
Don't get my hopes up!
41 posted on 02/28/2002 7:43:55 AM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

Comment #42 Removed by Moderator

To: Dog
This is the second time I have seen a Dem questioning the war in the last couple of days!

It was Byrd yesterday!

It's all pretty transparent. The Dems had to wait and see if the recession would be a useful issue in the elections. With Greenspan's announcement yesterday that a recovery is here, they lost that issue. I'm sure they knew a few days ahead of time what Greenspan was going to say, so they started sniping on a new front against Bush for the mid-terms.

ergo, the war.

It has nothing to do with anything real. It is entirely partisan political logic.

43 posted on 02/28/2002 7:44:14 AM PST by Taliesan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache
GET OUT ... Well looks like I'm not going anywhere today .. wouldn't miss this for anything
44 posted on 02/28/2002 7:44:22 AM PST by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer
LOL
45 posted on 02/28/2002 7:44:31 AM PST by homeschool mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: golonius
You could use his forehead to reflect microwave transmissions.

I think your talking about Paul "The Forehead" Begala.

Poser.

46 posted on 02/28/2002 7:44:36 AM PST by Phantom Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache
I don't disagree with the analysis--it was a dumb move on Clinton's part--why is Bush saying this now, right after he praises the Saudi 'initiative.' It will be interpreted as the US not committing to engaging the Israelis and the Palestinians.
47 posted on 02/28/2002 7:44:36 AM PST by mmmmmmmm....... donuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mickie
This philosophy might be at work here: "keep your friends close, but your enemies closer"...Laura is sweet and genuine, but she is also shrewd. I believe she will ultimately expose Hillary for the lying, disloyal "B" Laura knows she is. How better than to publicly show graciousness toward her? Laura's obvious character makes Hillary's deceitfulness that much more apparent to all. I'd prefer Laura kept her distance, but unpleasant proximity is sometimes necessary.
48 posted on 02/28/2002 7:44:38 AM PST by lsee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache
12:30. 45 minutes from now and I don't have cable. Ya reckon nbccbsabcfox may carry this? Anybody know where you can watch or hear this on the 'net? Respond here or FReepmail me. Thanks!
49 posted on 02/28/2002 7:44:41 AM PST by upchuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache
Hmmm. The way you've reported it, it sounds rather counterproductive. It'd lead to a lot of bluster and blame on both sides, and basically be more trouble than it's worth.

I think that what could be the topic is something slightly different: that the Bush administration will publicly repudiate Clinton's explicit "land for peace" stance as being unrealistic.

This would be in concord with Mubarak's comments regarding the Saudi peace proposal, which is in essence based on Clinton's formula (land for peace).

I think, too, that Ari will probably say something about how the reason that "land for peace" won't work, is that both parties have to agree with the "peace" part. And the Palestinians have not demonstrated this -- in which case "land for peace" is completely unworkable.

My humble guess.....

50 posted on 02/28/2002 7:44:42 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
I'm thinking it won't be long before Arafat is assassinated and then you'll see a Holy War like we haven't seen since 1967.

Depends on which side assassinates him.

51 posted on 02/28/2002 7:44:46 AM PST by Wyatt's Torch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red
He ain't no member no more.
52 posted on 02/28/2002 7:45:25 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
I swear I had flipped on when he was reading this wire copy and he said Ari is going to address this. Something inside me said 2 words... Free Republic.
53 posted on 02/28/2002 7:45:35 AM PST by My Favorite Headache
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: lsee
I think this deserves a message directly to the American people, delivered from the Oval Office.

Democrats are gearing up for November, this attack has just begun, If President Bush ducks instead of fighting back, and doesn't take advantage of his high numbers to go after Daschle, it will be a huge mistake. You don't let democrats get away with peeing on your leg. Next time, they will aim for your eyes.

54 posted on 02/28/2002 7:47:38 AM PST by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache
Related thread::

Bush spokesman says ex-President Clinton to blame for today's Mideast violence

55 posted on 02/28/2002 7:48:18 AM PST by veronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache
FINALLY! The gloves are off!
56 posted on 02/28/2002 7:48:52 AM PST by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
Sanchez was sitting there almost in a form of shock and confusion as well...he was literally saying that this was going back to 2000 and that this was coming from the white house and ari will be talking about this at 12:30 and they were to carry it live.
57 posted on 02/28/2002 7:50:03 AM PST by My Favorite Headache
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
do you think we might get a double shot against the dim's? Ari hitting the Clinton's and Daschle for his comments?
58 posted on 02/28/2002 7:51:06 AM PST by My Favorite Headache
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: YaYa123
YAHOO! I hope he rips them from one end of the spectrum to the other....they deserve it. Where is the "patriotism" they so "wanted" 5-1/2 months ago? Is it down the toilet? Yup. With their freaking brains.

Go Ari...give 'em hell. (I mean heck). :-)

59 posted on 02/28/2002 7:51:30 AM PST by DJ88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache
MSNBC: Ari Fleischer To Blast Clinton Administration At 12:30

I wish this would become a regular, everyday thing. I'd tune in for the daily Clinton blasting, wouldn't you?

60 posted on 02/28/2002 7:52:30 AM PST by TrappedInLiberalHell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-296 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson