Replies

Hmmm. The way you've reported it, it sounds rather counterproductive. It'd lead to a lot of bluster and blame on both sides, and basically be more trouble than it's worth.

I think that what could be the topic is something slightly different: that the Bush administration will publicly repudiate Clinton's explicit "land for peace" stance as being unrealistic.

This would be in concord with Mubarak's comments regarding the Saudi peace proposal, which is in essence based on Clinton's formula (land for peace).

I think, too, that Ari will probably say something about how the reason that "land for peace" won't work, is that both parties have to agree with the "peace" part. And the Palestinians have not demonstrated this -- in which case "land for peace" is completely unworkable.

My humble guess.....

Sanchez was sitting there almost in a form of shock and confusion as well...he was literally saying that this was going back to 2000 and that this was coming from the white house and ari will be talking about this at 12:30 and they were to carry it live.

Hillarious. Ari won't even touch mentioning Clinton at all now in the latest WH Press Briefing. It were as if the he got castrated earlier in the day.

Gotta get the transcript of this one.