Replies

Don't put words in my mouth. That's not what I said at all.

But that is exactly what you are saying. You may not be saying it outright, but you are most definitely implying it.

I don't know. Maybe because he is acting like a guilty man.

Guilty of what? Being an adulterer? Being an insensitive dork? I hardly see that reason for a journalist to follow someone around with his car.

I gave you a list of six nothings (gaps in alibi,etc.) when taken in their totality are very significant.

Nothing plus nothing equals nothing, no matter what your government school math teacher told you.

You know, three posts later, you still have not presented anything even remotely resembling proof, much like the Fox News Channel on this issue. Instead, you have decided to use the tired tactic of calling people on things you are actually doing yourself. And I really loved your suggestion I was doing something criminal on the one day I was absent from class during my high school senior year.

I have gone toe-to-toe with people who can troll a whole lot better than you can. I knew I was dealing with an amateur the minute I saw your "pot calling the kettle black" BS. You really should have quit while you were behind, or at least admitted that I am correct, in that there is not anything that connects Gary Condit to the disappearance of Chandra Levy.

And that's a fact, too.

Try me on for size, hotshot. Even the police state they believe the perp was someone she knew. There is no evidence Chandra knew anyone well except her platonic friend and Condirt. She was very much a loner. She left with only her keys, Condirt's m.o. requirement. Those that know him intimately, AMS, Flamingo, both say he's capable of being involved in her disappearance, albeit with different perconditions from both of those. He said he had a Doctor's appointment but has never revealed what Doctor. Word is, Gar don't go to doctors. His various statements about when he was last in touch with her don't make sense. His statement to AMS "I may have to disappear for a while."

Guess what, in the formulation of probable cause, even hearsay is admissable. You are obviously not familiar with the term "totality of circumstances." Condirt got some Grand Jury 'splaining to do.

Your assertion that we can't tie Condidit to Chandra's disappearance does not mean he is innocent or that he is not in some way responsible. In other words it does not rule him out as the perpetrator of her, shall we say demise. All it means is no one has found the ‘stained blue dress' and they will keep looking inspite of your willingness to give Condidit a free pass by ingoring all the facts. They will do it not only for Chandra but also for her parents. Afterall, parents who have lost one of their offspring deserve to find the answer.

It is clear to anyone reading this thread that you want to ignore all the facts of this case and instead use faulty logic in your arguments. This obviously is the same thing you are doing to come to the inflated false conclusions about yourself. But, then again, I guess some people are easily impressed with themselves especially when they are drinking out of the trough of self grandizement.

Clearly you are following the same tried and true liberal tactic of not being able to argue the facts so then you start your sophomoric ranting along with name calling and personal attack. These tactics that you are displaying are insulting to the intelligence of all FReepers.

Obviously you now need to slither back to where you came from before you started vomiting all over this thread.

There is no question that you sir, are the troll!

Here's a question you can ponder. If you would like to take a stab at it and you do a good enough job then I'll tell you how Abbe Lowell answered it.

Mr. Condit, please pull the microphone in front of you, I have a question to ask.

Mr. Condit the Modesto Bee reported Chandra's parents called you on Sun May 6th at your Calif home to tell you they couldn't find Chandra. You were reported to have called the police on Mon May 7th while on your way to the airport.

Mr. Condit I contend if you didn't make phone calls during this time frame looking for Chandra then that implies you already knew her fate.

So my question Mr. Condit, did you make any phone calls during this time frame looking for Chandra? And secondly, will you provide your phone records, during this time frame, to the proper athorities so they can learn the truth about your actions and inactions?

You see Mr. Condit this will help tell a very important part of your story.