[Balata]

Your assertion that we can't tie Condidit to Chandra's disappearance does not mean he is innocent or that he is not in some way responsible. In other words it does not rule him out as the perpetrator of her, shall we say demise. All it means is no one has found the ‘stained blue dress' and they will keep looking inspite of your willingness to give Condidit a free pass by ingoring all the facts. They will do it not only for Chandra but also for her parents. Afterall, parents who have lost one of their offspring deserve to find the answer.

It is clear to anyone reading this thread that you want to ignore all the facts of this case and instead use faulty logic in your arguments. This obviously is the same thing you are doing to come to the inflated false conclusions about yourself. But, then again, I guess some people are easily impressed with themselves especially when they are drinking out of the trough of self grandizement.

Clearly you are following the same tried and true liberal tactic of not being able to argue the facts so then you start your sophomoric ranting along with name calling and personal attack. These tactics that you are displaying are insulting to the intelligence of all FReepers.

Obviously you now need to slither back to where you came from before you started vomiting all over this thread.

There is no question that you sir, are the troll!

[Houmatt]

Your assertion that we can't tie Condidit to Chandra's disappearance does not mean he is innocent or that he is not in some way responsible.

Thank you for coming out and saying this. Now I finally know where you stand: You do not care if there is proof or not. You will remain convinced he is responsible.

This is why you will never be allowed to sit on a jury.