I don't know, you tell me.
I was merely illustrating how absurd your accusation is. What you are saying is: Condit missed a few votes, therefore, he is responsible for the disappearance of Chandra Levy. I do not care what you may want to call that, but I see it for what it is, a Grand Canyon-sized leap in logic.
Don't put words in my mouth. That's not what I said at all. That's your non-sequetor logic speaking not mine. When talking about motive and opportunity for a crime this certainly speaks to the opportunity.
FACT: A packed suitcase, among other items, were found in her apartment.
Good, that's the first fact I've seen you post.
My question is: Why have a journalist follow Condit in a way that suggests he was being kept under some kind of suveillance?
I don't know. Maybe because he is acting like a guilty man.
Why make a big deal out of something that was nothing?
What nothing are you talking about. I gave you a list of six nothings (gaps in alibi,etc.) when taken in their totality are very significant. You on the other hand don't want to look at the whole picture.
You know, before you start accusing people of not arguing from facts I think you should give yourself a good, long look in the mirror, cowboy.
LOL! Priceless.
Don't put words in my mouth. That's not what I said at all.
But that is exactly what you are saying. You may not be saying it outright, but you are most definitely implying it.
I don't know. Maybe because he is acting like a guilty man.
Guilty of what? Being an adulterer? Being an insensitive dork? I hardly see that reason for a journalist to follow someone around with his car.
I gave you a list of six nothings (gaps in alibi,etc.) when taken in their totality are very significant.
Nothing plus nothing equals nothing, no matter what your government school math teacher told you.
You know, three posts later, you still have not presented anything even remotely resembling proof, much like the Fox News Channel on this issue. Instead, you have decided to use the tired tactic of calling people on things you are actually doing yourself. And I really loved your suggestion I was doing something criminal on the one day I was absent from class during my high school senior year.
I have gone toe-to-toe with people who can troll a whole lot better than you can. I knew I was dealing with an amateur the minute I saw your "pot calling the kettle black" BS. You really should have quit while you were behind, or at least admitted that I am correct, in that there is not anything that connects Gary Condit to the disappearance of Chandra Levy.
And that's a fact, too.