Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Passes Campaign Finance Bill
CNSNews.com ^ | 2/14/02 | Susan Jones

Posted on 02/14/2002 1:52:44 AM PST by kattracks

(CNSNews.com) - They did it: Following a 16-hour debate, the U.S. House of Representatives early Thursday morning passed a bill that would change the nation's campaign finance laws - for the better, said supporters; and for worse, said critics.

The vote was 240-189, with 41 Republicans and one independent voting for the Shays-Meehan bill, 12 Democrats voting with 176 Republicans and one independent against it.

The measure that passed around 2:30 a.m. is close enough to the Senate version that it could go straight to the Senate floor for a vote, in which case Republicans are promising a filibuster; or if the Senate doesn't accept it outright, it could move into a conference committee first.

President Bush, much to the dismay of some Republicans, is expected to sign the measure once it reaches his desk.

Here's some of what the House-passed bill does: It bans unregulated "soft-money" given to national political parties by corporations, unions, interest groups, and individuals; but it would allow soft-money contributions to state and local parties, up to a $10,000 limit.

It allows individuals to donate up to $2,000 (from the current $1,000 limit) to political candidates. And it also restricts broadcast advertising in the sixty days before an election.

The latter provision may provide the "meat" for a legal challenge. Opponents - who already are threatening to sue -- say restricting broadcast advertising before an election is tantamount to restricting free speech.

As for the soft-money ban, opponents say it is nothing more than a move to protect political incumbents against challengers who are less well known.

On the other hand, campaign finance "reformers" say the bill will help restore public confidence in the political system where money buys influence. Nonsense, say critics, who insist that money talks - always has and always will. They say politicians will find ways around the law, or simply walk through its loopholes.

 


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-236 last
To: RFP
Good luck on finding a W.Va. conservative to run against Humphreys or Workman. (It's not my district or I'd consider it).
221 posted on 02/14/2002 1:26:33 PM PST by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Take a look at zonitics.com for a report on how McCain's unconstitutional bill carves out one of his biggest groups of contributors while shutting down free speech for everyone else.
222 posted on 02/14/2002 3:23:57 PM PST by AZPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RFP
thanks....I'm with you on JD
223 posted on 02/14/2002 3:56:31 PM PST by Vinomori
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: mwl1
I am sorry, but I will not play that game. I am extremely disappointed in Mr. Thune and it speaks volume concerning his integrity.

Either he believes in the Constitutional guarantees or he doesn't and to play politics with them makes me want to ask what else is he willing to risk.

What is wrong with standing on principle? What you are saying is that he cast his vote for political gain. Well, my friend, that is what is wrong with the nation in the first place. Not much principled leadership these days.

You may be able to justify the vote and that is your right (so far), but I can't and won't. I don't know what I will do come November but my emotional first response is to sit this one out. To my mind he (Thune) is no better than the man he would replace when it comes to principle, honor, and integrity.

Again, I am not at all suggesting that you shouldn't give a wink and a nod and support the man. I am just getting to the end of my rope on voting against the least preferred candidate. Hopefully there is a line that you too won't cross for political power, but this may not be it. I think it is for me.

224 posted on 02/14/2002 4:15:21 PM PST by ImpBill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
You hit a home run JH2.

Tonight I am really sick, as the man I hoped to support in the opening battle towards the ultimate removal of Tom Daschle from power, my Congressman at Large, John Thune, for purely politcal reasons, voted with the Constitutional Pirates.

From what I have gathered so far, he will get away with crapping on his base. I can't describe adequately the feelings I currently have. It is akin to the mourning process.

Are there no real leaders out there any longer who stand on principle? Is every position taken for purely political gain? And worse, where are the people demanding principles before partisan party political power?

Thanks to Mr. Thunes action last night, this night I have similar feelings to which I felt, when it became crystal clear that Trent Lott was not going to allow a "real trial" in the Senate Impeachment dog and pony show.

I am back to tagging my rants with ...

"America ... Where are you now?"

225 posted on 02/14/2002 4:29:58 PM PST by ImpBill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt
"No more fight left. Not for these traitors."

Trust me, you are not alone.

I was a card carrying, volunteer working, involved member of the G.O.P. for 32 years. When Trent Lott made the decision to have a dog and pony show instead of a real Impeachment Trial just to placate Daschle, I shortly there after re-registered with "Party Affiliation - NONE". I continued to support GOP candidates with my vote and financial support in this last election cycle for Keyes first in the primary and then GW in the general. But I did so as a little "r" republican and not as a "R" Republican.

I live in South Dakota and there is no stronger an Anti-DemocRAT than I. I have been supporting John Thune's bid for the Senate to 1) unseat Tim Johnson (D) but more importantly 2) set up 2004 to rid ourselves of Tom Daschle. I had even gone to the point of soliciting clients of mine from outside of SD, whom I knew from association over time, were like minded conservative/traditionally valued Americans, to offer financial support to Mr. Thune.

John Thune voted for CFR. I feel as you, the fight is gone and no longer will I battle for those who won't at the minimum work to insure that my right to do so isn't taken from me.

"No more fight left. Not for these traitors." Says it all.

226 posted on 02/14/2002 5:14:09 PM PST by ImpBill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr
Is there a rule that says on election day you have to be a big "R" Republican to vote for GOP candidates? Try it you might like it. Perhaps if we can get enough traditionally valued conservatives to re-register without party affiliation the "go along to get along" bunch will get the message. If they don't what have you lost?
227 posted on 02/14/2002 5:17:49 PM PST by ImpBill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
Re: #125 -- very well stated.

FILIBUSTER MAY STYMIE Shays-Meehan bill: Campaign reform heads to Senate

228 posted on 02/15/2002 12:09:09 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: ImpBill
You hit a home run JH2.

Thanks, my friend.

229 posted on 02/15/2002 12:10:12 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Check this out, my friend:

FILIBUSTER MAY STYMIE Shays-Meehan bill: Campaign reform heads to Senate

230 posted on 02/15/2002 12:28:31 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2, all
1-202-456-1414, 1-202-456-5594 - PHone numbers.

Almost ALL can make a CALL! Please, Mr. President, veto this horrendous legislation!

231 posted on 02/15/2002 10:23:48 AM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: RFP
Thanks for the ping.

But I can't stand J.D. Wouldn't vote for him as dog catcher.

232 posted on 02/15/2002 11:51:45 AM PST by lakey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Spiff
Sir, you have the government you deserve and Democrats will be dancing on your grave.
233 posted on 02/18/2002 5:25:48 AM PST by B. A. Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: meanspirit77
I see a different path. I think we need for one state to secede. And I don't think it will matter whether it is a coastal state running left or a conservative state wanting to restore freedom. If there is a Republican, as now, in the Whitehouse they will be allowed to go in peace. I think that will trigger an Avalanche of individual and groups of regional secessions. I see the US disintegrating into 5-10 much smaller sovereign countries with regional and political ties to each other. I suspect what was formerly national defense will be done by treaty, maybe even under contract with military corp.

The United States is now a passing giant still wallowing in the glory of its rise to power. Its future is measured in days rather than decades. There will be no US presidential election in 2016, unless we make substantial changes beginning now. I think it is already too late, but there will be no political possibility of making and keeping the changes required without a Term Limits Amendment. A Constitutional Convention remains the one viable chance to save the United States. And make no mistake, I think the United States is worth saving, but I believe that the last election proves there are a very large number of Americans who prefer Wonderland and Disneyland. When your heroes are Clinton and FDR instead of Washington and Jefferson, we have come a long way baby. And from the red and blue map that emerged after the election, there will be no going back. The beauty of the map is that it proved the geo-political division of the US is eminently feasible. I have come to point where I believe is preferable and desirable. Count me as a secessionist.

234 posted on 02/18/2002 5:44:58 AM PST by B. A. Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: B. A. Conservative
Sir, you have the government you deserve and Democrats will be dancing on your grave.

If you're saying that it is too late to reign in government because any attempt by a Republic will cause a Democrat to win - so Republicans need to emulate the Democrats to hold power. Well, if that is the case, then it must be time to break out the muskets and pitchforks to win our individual rights back.

235 posted on 02/18/2002 6:11:18 AM PST by Spiff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
It was the snake handlers that took the first bite of the apple.
236 posted on 02/25/2002 4:24:09 AM PST by B. A. Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-236 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson