Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Passes Campaign Finance Bill
CNSNews.com ^ | 2/14/02 | Susan Jones

Posted on 02/14/2002 1:52:44 AM PST by kattracks

(CNSNews.com) - They did it: Following a 16-hour debate, the U.S. House of Representatives early Thursday morning passed a bill that would change the nation's campaign finance laws - for the better, said supporters; and for worse, said critics.

The vote was 240-189, with 41 Republicans and one independent voting for the Shays-Meehan bill, 12 Democrats voting with 176 Republicans and one independent against it.

The measure that passed around 2:30 a.m. is close enough to the Senate version that it could go straight to the Senate floor for a vote, in which case Republicans are promising a filibuster; or if the Senate doesn't accept it outright, it could move into a conference committee first.

President Bush, much to the dismay of some Republicans, is expected to sign the measure once it reaches his desk.

Here's some of what the House-passed bill does: It bans unregulated "soft-money" given to national political parties by corporations, unions, interest groups, and individuals; but it would allow soft-money contributions to state and local parties, up to a $10,000 limit.

It allows individuals to donate up to $2,000 (from the current $1,000 limit) to political candidates. And it also restricts broadcast advertising in the sixty days before an election.

The latter provision may provide the "meat" for a legal challenge. Opponents - who already are threatening to sue -- say restricting broadcast advertising before an election is tantamount to restricting free speech.

As for the soft-money ban, opponents say it is nothing more than a move to protect political incumbents against challengers who are less well known.

On the other hand, campaign finance "reformers" say the bill will help restore public confidence in the political system where money buys influence. Nonsense, say critics, who insist that money talks - always has and always will. They say politicians will find ways around the law, or simply walk through its loopholes.

 


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 221-236 next last
To: Clarity
LMAO
141 posted on 02/14/2002 6:54:59 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
One of the amendments passed during debate was a proposal by Sen. Wayne Allard, R-Colo., that would expand the voting rights of military personnel. The proposal would prohibit states from disqualifying ballots from military personnel that lack of a proper postmark."
142 posted on 02/14/2002 6:56:47 AM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a Liar
Hello - Is there any way Alan Keyes could take this discussion on his program if he has not already. I thought I saw a small piece about it last night but didn't get to see the whole thing and wondered if he would give a whole show to this issue. If so, please ping me. Of course - it is too late - they have won. Hillary has won.

If somebody would go over to her office right now I am sure you would find a party going on.

143 posted on 02/14/2002 6:58:21 AM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr
But let me just say, as I promised my wife 2-3 yrs ago, that I no longer belong to the Republican Party. I wont be a party to a Party that votes to kill itself. More later.

When you find the perfect party, please let the rest of us know. As for me, my Congressman voted against this, as well as 175 others. I'm not about to give up on those good Republicans. Most third parties are a joke, especially the Reform Party!

144 posted on 02/14/2002 6:59:30 AM PST by Alissa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
Your post.........One of the amendments passed during debate was a proposal by Sen. Wayne Allard, R-Colo., that would expand the voting rights of military personnel. The proposal would prohibit states from disqualifying ballots from military personnel that lack of a proper postmark." Now, that my friend is a Disruptor of an Amendment to a bad bill, if Ive ever seen one.
145 posted on 02/14/2002 7:01:10 AM PST by rbmillerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Rep. Sherwood Boehlert VOTED FOR IT

Big surprise.

He voted lockstep with the Dems all the way.

Boehlert Must Go

146 posted on 02/14/2002 7:02:40 AM PST by 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
RE: date of implementation amendment

Believe me. I watched it on CSPAN live at midnight. Barny F-..rank was crying that this legislation couldn't be imlemented this year because the California primaries were so close - another RAT actually cited US Constitution Article 1, Section 9, Clause 3 "Ex Post Facto" law (which I have to admit is a good point).

Conservatives wanted CFR to take effect retroactive to today, the Shays-Mehan POS has it take effect the day after November's election.

go to http://thomas.loc.gov and type in H.R. 2356 to get all 78 pages or so including amendments

147 posted on 02/14/2002 7:03:06 AM PST by RFP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Alissa
If voted on,,,,,,I'll stand proudly as an Independent (as I'm a big believer in the 2 Party system)...you'll be very relevant at best or very duped at worst - but will you be standing with pride?
148 posted on 02/14/2002 7:03:57 AM PST by rbmillerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr
Please at least consider what I wrote in #125, OK?
149 posted on 02/14/2002 7:05:53 AM PST by Matchett-PI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: RFP
Thank you.
150 posted on 02/14/2002 7:06:05 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI, Eternal Vigilance, PhiKapMom
Why do you think every Rat wanted this bill so much they have pulled out every stop in the book to get it? The Rats view the Republican House "majority" as garbage. I do too now.
151 posted on 02/14/2002 7:07:07 AM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr
I like the military ammendment.
Clintons clan made sure the military didn't recieve their ballots on time, and their votes came in late.
They were, of course, overwhelmingly Republican votes.
They were tossed out in Florida.
This takes their votes out of goverment control.
152 posted on 02/14/2002 7:09:03 AM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
"all the talk was of Enron"

I remember very clearly watching the hearings on Clinton's use of White House sleepovers as political fundraisers, and how the Democratic spin was, literally, "So what?" Time and again they said "So what?" as the committee attempted to learn if there was an illegal use of government property for partisan fundraising purposes. What a bunch of a**holes.
153 posted on 02/14/2002 7:11:05 AM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: tailgunner
Which vote is that? You've got 37 Republicans voting yes.

The vote on final passage had 41 Republicans voting yes, and five not voting (Roll Call 34). The Yes votes break down like this:

CA: Bono, Horn, Ose
CT: Johnson, Shays, Simmons
DE: Castle
FL: Foley, Ros-Lehtinen
IL: Johnson, Kirk
IA: Ganske, Leach
MD: Gilchrest, Morella
MI: Smith, Upton
MN: Ramstad
NE: Bereuter, Osborne
NH: Bass
NJ: Ferguson, Frelinghuysen, LoBiondo
NY: Boehlert, Gilman, Quinn, Walsh, Grucci, Houghton, McHugh
OH: LaTourette
PA: Greenwood, Weldon, Platts
SC: Graham
SD: Thune
TN: Wamp
VA: Wolf
WV: Capito
WI: Petri

154 posted on 02/14/2002 7:11:55 AM PST by 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
In an earlier post, I stated clearly I'm out of the gop only if house,senate vote yes and Bush refuses to veto. This is a sad day for me because ive worked hard for the gop in the past.

And I'm a realist who believes in the 2 party system (or at least realistically sees the folly of smaller fringe parties - they are really interest groups)But this is a fundamental issue for me and many others. It appears the gop thinks it can slip it in why the country is preoccupied.

155 posted on 02/14/2002 7:13:39 AM PST by rbmillerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
the military amendment is worthy but attached to the sweet stink of a rotten fish bill
156 posted on 02/14/2002 7:16:33 AM PST by rbmillerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr
but will you be standing with pride?

I'm still a proud conservative Republican. There were a few who fell that were not conservative, but it was the overwhelming democrat support that passed the bill.
I'm proud to be a conservative Republican.

157 posted on 02/14/2002 7:17:24 AM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt
"Of course - it is too late - they have won. Hillary has won."

Do you think snakes ever get the upper hand with Bush?? Stand back and watch and stop the hand wringing. (See #125 and 103)

Sidewinders like McCain & company should know by now that "Don't Mess With Texas" is not an idle threat.

158 posted on 02/14/2002 7:17:51 AM PST by Matchett-PI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr
I think you're politically naive.
159 posted on 02/14/2002 7:20:23 AM PST by Matchett-PI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr
the military amendment is worthy but attached to the sweet stink of a rotten fish bill

yep. Republicans helped the military vote. Had the democrats not voted overwhelmingly for the rest , we wouldn't have this problem today. A few Republicans fell, but 40 does not make up the majority. The real enemy is still the DNC.

160 posted on 02/14/2002 7:21:02 AM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 221-236 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson