Posted on 02/12/2002 11:02:45 AM PST by Dawgsquat
My self defense pistol has no sights, no bells and no whistles as I'm not a LEO or serviceman anymore and if I can't run, hide or evade a threat it will IMHO and experience become a fast point and shoot CQB sort of last resort engagement . With the 1911 I am faster and my use of it over the years has made it "memory-matic" for me while under stress load of fear and confusion. My continued weekly practice and competition in IDPA with that single sidearm keeps that memory alive and fuctioning which I hope will be my condition afterwards if I'm ever required to use it in civilian life as a last resort. Lord forbid.....
Ya'll stay safe !
People who are very comfortable with an action that requires a little work before using it (e.g. SA revolvers or SA pistols) don't forget to do it because it isn't a conscious action. It is as reflexive as pulling the trigger. People have told me that I sweep the "safety" on SIGs and Glocks when I draw to shoot, and basically any other time I would have swept the safety on a 1911. It is so automatic that I don't even notice it when I do it, and apparently I do it on pistols for which it isn't necessary. I still shoot single action pistols though, so the reflex stays strong.
That has not been my experience. Do you have a source for that?
A soldier wants a pistol that goes bang every time, even if it has been dragged through the mud or dropped in the ocean. An M1911 doesn't do this very well.
Yes it does. That was all it was built for--Killing Moros in the inhospitable climate of the Philippines. It excelled at that.
Making patently absurd claims about the 1911 doesn't make the Glock or Sig or HK or Sux2000 or whatever new fad gun the SWAT jock-sniffers are all happy over any better a weapon.
Dude, when you are 'seeing the elephant' and have to pull one in extremis, just not pissing yourself becomes a very conscious act....
I do truly like semis (1911 style firstly) and I'm a better shot with them but the deliberate nature of shooting SAs is good for one's discipline.
regards.
Best not to waste ammo on a fellow gun afficianado....we've got bigger fish to fry coming down the pike someday I fear but I understand....I was sighting in my Jaeger .54 last summer and a fellow near me was sighting in his 375 H&H for an African big game hunt....I just watched and waited. The .375 report is rather loud.
Stay Safe !
Just for curiosity, 20 years ago, how many rounds a month did you fire and did you consider that enough?
Yeppurs, although the other thing is a temptation from time to time...I used to use a ported .38 super my brother built for me for that purpose. The range banned 'em. Rats...
Mark me down in your book as being a believer in the 1911 .45.
I'm a lousy shot compared to most, but I can still nail a bulls-eye with my Colt .45 at 50 yards.
And there's nothing like the reassurance that the .45 puts into you. It feels solid. The kick from each shot reminds you of its power, and whatever you hit tends to show some pretty large effects at being on the wrong side of it.
Interesting that you say that, because I can't get any of my Glock mags apart that way. The mags will not compress. I guess if I took a pair of channel locks to them I could get them to compress, but not with my hands.
Of course, I'm only 6'2" and 260 pounds. I've been using my hands and hand tools all my adult life to build things. But maybe my hands aren't as strong as the average guy.
"The E-gun"
"You have bang...."
Au contraire, mon ami. I live in California. I have the nice, safe, legal 10-round mags. It just wouldn't be safe to carry anything else. < / sarcasm >
And you're right. It's definitely not a concealed carry weapon. But it feels comfortable in my hand.
But seriously folks. . . as good a weapon as it is, I wouldn't give up my Glock for anything.
Another satisfied Glock customer.
Got one and absolutely love it.
I disagree with you on a number of points. IDPA is practice for the type of combat that I would be expected to be involved in. I have found that my 1911 is a better suited pistol for what I think would happen on the street. The bells and whistles are where I expect them to be. It may be true that you're seeing different pistols being used and winning in IDPA matches but I did notice that those people are being a little more "gamey" than they should be. I noticed that people who are more interested in winning than practicing are competing with 9MM in exposed holsters. I use a Springfield Ultra-Carry for my concealed and ironically I have to shoot a Commander for IDPA because the ports on the Springfield are illegal. If I have a choice between a 9MM and carrying a .45. I carry the .45. The 1911 has proven itself in every war since WWI. The Berretta had problems with the sand in Desert Storm.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.