Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China enraged by Bush's U.N.-fund pullout
Washington Times ^ | 2/06/02 | Damien McElroy, LONDON SUNDAY TELEGRAPH

Posted on 02/05/2002 10:42:02 PM PST by kattracks

Edited on 07/12/2004 3:37:21 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

BEIJING

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortionlist; mosher; poporg; populationcontrol; populationinstitute; populationresearch; pri; prolife; stevermosher; un; unitednations; unlist

1 posted on 02/05/2002 10:42:02 PM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *UN_list;*Abortion_list;*Pro_Life
bump
2 posted on 02/05/2002 10:51:03 PM PST by Fish out of Water
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
screw the chinese.
3 posted on 02/05/2002 10:55:28 PM PST by wafflehouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wafflehouse
NO!!!! UNSCREW them. Abstinence is the best birth control there is.
4 posted on 02/06/2002 12:14:19 AM PST by Nix 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
they protest too much, if they weren't using it for that reason then why they are they so upset? They're not upset about being mislabeled but that they won't get $34m??

$34 million is not a lot of cash to the Chinese government is it?

5 posted on 02/06/2002 12:20:32 AM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The Chinese "correct choice" is INCORRECT.
President Bush made the correct choice.
(No quotation marks needed.
Excessive use of quotes around normal words, along with the overuse of the term "so-called," are reserved for Chinese propagandists who cannot understand non-commie ideas.)
Similar article:
China is furious as Bush halts UN 'abortion' funds
The Sunday Telegraph (U.K.) | 02/03/2002 | Damien McElroy

A DECISION by President Bush to suspend £24 million of United States funding to a United Nations body accused of assisting forced abortions in China is threatening to cloud his visit to Beijing this month. By withholding the money from the UN Fund for Population Activities (UNFPA), Mr Bush has made clear his opposition to China's extreme population control methods. Beijing is hoping to extend the controls, which restrict the majority of couples to one child, for another generation. Beijing is furious with Mr Bush, who has been swayed by reports implicating the UNFPA in abuses of the one-child policy. ...Posted on 2/2/02 5:21 PM Pacific by Pokey78

China is furious as Bush halts UN 'abortion' funds
Telegraph UK | 3 Feb 2002 | Damien McElroy

...Posted on 2/3/02 12:52 PM Pacific by The Old Hoosier


6 posted on 02/06/2002 1:11:25 AM PST by heleny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL; kattracks
$34 million is not a lot of cash to the "Chinese government" is it?

First consider that, like everything else in "China," it has to be split among the gang of two hundred and fifty psychpathological slave-keeping mass-murderers that has coopted phrases and words like "Chinese government" and "Peking" [The English-Language word for the gang of 250's base of operations] to its own use.

And then figger it out.

Probably -- even by the standards of Peking's lying thieving mass-murdering gang -- not a bad half-a-day's work?

7 posted on 02/06/2002 2:06:33 AM PST by Brian Allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"Beijing is hoping to extend the controls, which restrict the majority of couples to one child, for another generation."

Why is ANY country other than China funding this?

Thank you for following your clear-headed convictions, Mr. President.

8 posted on 02/06/2002 3:14:38 AM PST by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen
Actually, I doubt the money is the issue at all. I believe the Chinese want the tacit acceptance of their horrible policy by the UN and by extension, the US.
9 posted on 02/06/2002 3:36:37 AM PST by MrTed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: kattracks
Memo to the Foreign Ministry of the PRC:
William Jefferson (hey babe, what's your sign) Clinton is no longer President of the United States of America.
11 posted on 02/06/2002 5:43:48 AM PST by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Yup, let's tie the Chinese and forced abortions to the pro-choice fanatics. They deserve each other.
12 posted on 02/06/2002 6:30:09 AM PST by Kermit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
bump
13 posted on 02/06/2002 8:30:07 AM PST by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I don't give a damn what excuse Bush uses to defund the UN, just so long as he does it!

Life is so simple, just

Chicomboycott.com

Sign this PETITION for the U.S. to get out of the U.N.

14 posted on 02/06/2002 9:30:41 AM PST by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks; Carry_Okie; Coleus; ELS; ThomasMore; Judith Anne
A few bumps from the previous article. Defunded!
15 posted on 02/08/2002 9:04:34 AM PST by patent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patent
Thanks for the flag! Another incremental bump.
16 posted on 02/08/2002 12:22:40 PM PST by ELS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson