Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Puberty Hitting Girls At Younger Age
KOIN 6 News ^ | January 28, 2002 | Christine Miles

Posted on 01/30/2002 10:46:32 AM PST by TopQuark

Puberty Hitting Girls At Younger Age

Christine Miles, KOIN 6 News

PORTLAND -- If you think kids are growing up too fast these days, you may be right.

Girls are hitting puberty at an earlier age, and scientists say it may be a sign of other health problems.

Researchers at Oregon Health and Science University's Primate Research Center are trying to figure out why some girls as young as 4 or 5 are entering puberty.

They say genetics plays a role, but they've also discovered that environmental factors, like certain plastics, could trigger early puberty.

If you think young girls are growing up too fast and looking more mature than their age, it's not just the trendy clothes or makeup that they wear.

Their bodies are changing -- entering puberty way before their parent's did.

"Parents are having to learn to rethink what they think is normal," Daniel Mark of OHSU explains.

Over the last century, the average age for girls entering puberty was age 13. But today, research shows that it's much younger.

For Caucasian girls, the first signs of puberty come at age 7 or 8. For African-American girls, it's a little younger, between the ages of 6-8.

At the Primate Center, researchers say genetics and environmental factors play a role in the early onset of puberty. For the last 30 years, Dr. Sergio Ojeda has been studying pre-mature puberty.

He has a documented case of a girl, just 18 months old, fully developed, and a baby, not even a year old, menstruating.

"She was menstruating at 7 months, and by 9 months, she was menstruating regularly," Ojeda says.

Puberty is a function driven by the brain. The hypothalamus is an area at the base of the brain responsible for awakening part of the body to the process of puberty.

Researchers believe that everyday environmental toxins trigger signals to the brain to begin puberty before the body is ready.

"Chemicals that are used to make plastic that you see everyday -- plastic of soft drinks, the plastic that makes containers for milk, for baby formula," Ojeda says.

Ojeda says that plastic toxins mimic hormones like estrogen, which play a key role in stimulating the brain.

But if the body starts developing too early, it could be a warning sign for parents.

"A 4-year-old having breast budding has a much high risk having something pathological going on like a CNS tumor or a cystic or a problem with their ovary." Those cases are rare, Marks says that parents need to be aware of possible problems their children could be facing so they can get treatment.

"Medication is the treatment. And it's not a benign therapy, but it's an effective therapy once a monthly injections of a hormone," Marks says.

Researchers hope to track down an exact cause in premature puberty, in hopes of slowing down the development process, so kids can enjoy being kids.

Boys are also entering puberty earlier, but not as quickly as girls.

Researchers also say that childhood obesity is also a trigger for premature puberty.


Posted: January 28, 2002

All Material Copyright 2001, Emmis Television LP
or by original content developer


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
Comment #61 Removed by Moderator

To: TopQuark
Thank Goodness my grandaughters (ages 10 & 12) are old fashioned girls.
62 posted on 01/30/2002 2:45:07 PM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
Where do you get your facts? I am 61 years old & I remember 50 years ago & the AVERAGE was not 16 years old.
63 posted on 01/30/2002 2:49:35 PM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
Did these girls have trouble keeping their calves together? Dairy farming can be a lot of work.
64 posted on 01/30/2002 2:50:47 PM PST by Chemnitz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jae471
Argentina would agree with you. M

hmm argentina isn't too on top of things though...

65 posted on 01/30/2002 2:57:32 PM PST by KneelBeforeZod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: geaux
I remember reading somewhere several years ago that the youngest girl to give birth was a 9 year old from Africa.

Yeow! Not fun, I can imagine.

66 posted on 01/30/2002 2:59:34 PM PST by Chemist_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
I understand the earlier they hit puberty the higher their risk for cancer.
67 posted on 01/30/2002 3:00:07 PM PST by A CA Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hodar;DoughtyOne;jae471;A Ruckus of Dogs;Doctor Stochastic;Rodney King;NotJustAnotherPrettyFace...
Could the hormones given to dairy cattle cause these effects in us?

No. For two reasons: 1. Such hormones are incapable of ligating with primate growth hormone receptors.
FEBS Lett 2000 Apr 28;472(2-3):276-82

The species specificity of growth hormone requires the cooperative interaction of two motifs.

Peterson FC, Brooks CL.

Ohio State Biochemistry Program,
The Ohio State University,
1925 Coffey Road,
Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

Primate growth hormones (GH) activate both primate and non-primate somatotrophic receptors (GH receptors), but non-primate GHs do not activate primate GH receptors. Previous studies argued the interaction of Asp(171) of human GH and Arg(43) of the receptor produced an attractive ionic interaction. In non-primate GHs, His(170) replaces the homologous Asp(171), producing a repulsive interaction with Arg(43) of the primate receptor which was believed to reduce the attraction of non-primate GH for the human GH receptor, thus providing species specificity. In this report, H170D bovine GH had activity and affinity for human GH receptors approaching those of human GH. In contrast, replacing Asp(171) of human GH with His did not significantly reduce somatotrophic activity, indicating that species specificity is not wholly explained by this residue's interaction with Arg(43) of the receptor. Deletion of either Phe(44) (a residue present only in primate GHs) or residues 32-46 (20-kDa form of human GH) each only marginally reduced somatotrophic activities. But the combination of the D171H mutation with either DeltaPhe(44) or Delta32-46 in human GH reduced binding and activity in a greater than additive fashion, indicated a functional interaction between these distant structural features. In bovine GH addition of phenylalanine at position 44 increased the somatotrophic activity and receptor affinity in cells containing the human GH receptor. The combination of the H170D mutation and the addition of phenylalanine at position 44 created a bovine GH with activity indistinguishable from wild-type human GH. Based on evidence from both bovine and human GHs, the cooperative interaction of these two distant motifs determined the species specificity and indicated that structural plasticity was a critical feature necessary for the species specificity of somatotrophic activity.
In other words, if a human growth hormone were given to cattle or chickens, it would activate their growth. However, non-primate growth hormones will have no effect on primates. Argentina was wrong. But, then, a lot of people let themselves get stampeded into doing things simply because they "sound" reasonable.

2. Even if a non-primate growth hormone could have an effect, which it cannot, in any meat eaten that is cooked or milk that is pasteurized (or irradiated), the proteins are denatured and made incapable of interacting with growth hormone receptors.

Better diet. Generally poverty stricken areas have later puberty. People are taller now too. And heavier.

This appears to be the major factor. Body fat stores produce leptin in proportion to energy stores in terms of fat. When there is sufficient energy (as signaled by leptin to the pituitary) to permit the rapid growth involved in sexual maturation, then puberty is triggered. This is thought to be why women who are starving cease menstruation, why cultures with a comparatively low energy intake have delayed puberty compared to extremely well-fed ones, and why girls involved in gymnastics or other intense physical conditioning during which they try to keep off body fat while increasing muscle mass have delayed or interrupted puberty.

Note to all: puberty is not synonymous with "appearance of secondary sexual characteristics". Puberty begins several years in advance of the appearance of secondary sexual characteristics.
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2000 Jul;13 Suppl 1:717-22

Body fat mass, leptin and puberty.

Kiess W, Muller G, Galler A, Reich A, Deutscher J, Klammt J, Kratzsch J.

Children's Hospital,
University of Leipzig,
Germany.
kiw@server3.medizin.uni-leipzig.de

Leptin, the ob gene product, provides a molecular basis for the lipostatic theory of the regulation of energy balance. Leptin circulates as a monomeric 16 kDa protein in rodent and human plasma and is also bound to leptin binding proteins that may form large high molecular weight complexes. Initial models of leptin action included leptin-deficient ob/ob mice and leptin-insensitive db/db mice. Peripheral or central administration of leptin reduced body weight, adiposity, and food intake in ob/ob mice but not in db/db mice. In ob/ob mice leptin treatment restored fertility. Leptin interacts with many messenger molecules in the brain. For example, leptin suppresses neuropeptide Y (NPY) expression in the arcuate nucleus. Increased NPY activity has an inhibitory effect on the gonadotropin axis and represents a direct mechanism for inhibiting sexual maturation and reproductive function in conditions of food restriction and/or energy expenditure. By modulating the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal axis both directly and indirectly, leptin may thus serve as the signal from fat to the brain about the adequacy of fat stores for pubertal development and reproduction. Normal leptin secretion is necessary for normal reproductive function to proceed and leptin may be a signal allowing for the point of initiation of and progression toward puberty.

68 posted on 01/30/2002 3:28:19 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
Great reply. I'm going to file that away. I don't know enough about the information it reports to totally sign off on it's validity. However on first reading it does seem to strike down my question rather well. Thanks.
69 posted on 01/30/2002 3:57:19 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
Well here is somthing else to blame us guys about.
70 posted on 01/30/2002 4:02:29 PM PST by M.K. Borders
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
I have two daughters, myself.

Both daughters are gone. Wife is old. All is well.

71 posted on 01/30/2002 4:09:17 PM PST by jackliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
The hormones used to enhance milk and beef production CANNOT trigger early puberty. That is the thing about hormones, their action is VERY SPECIFIC TO CERTAIN FUNCTIONS. If you want to blame a hormone, blame the BIRTH CONTROL HORMONES that are peed down the drain and get into the water supply. THOSE hormones are directly related to pubertal function.

But by are the most likely driving force for early puberty (for both BOYS and girls) is superior nutrition, both pre-natal and early childhood. This has been known for decades--in a poor nutritional scenario, puberty is delayed, with excellent nutrition, it happens much earlier.

72 posted on 01/30/2002 4:19:37 PM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
Are you serious ? A 8 year old who is 5' 6" and ooks like she belongs in high school ? Not here, in Conn., and there are dairy farms, where I live. Eight year olds, around here, look like little girls, and are NOT that tall.
73 posted on 01/30/2002 4:20:34 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
The hormones in milk have been suspected of many things for a long time. Some interesting info that was passed along to me recently was on some research that indicated that soy and soy products (soy estrogen) could be causing some problems, especially with all the soy formula that is being touted for infants.

I haven't had time to research it all and read all the material, but what I have been struck with initially is that those who are raising a cautious red flag and saying "wait a minute, we need to study this more" are being shouted out by the soy lobby and all the "health Nazi's" who tell us that soy is the answer for all of lifes ills. The pro-soy advocates don't seem to answer science with science, but rather rely on (seemingly) unsubstantiated claims about how the much soy that certain nationalities eat and how healthy they all are.

It may turn out that there is not a problem, but I think (at least from what I've seen) there has been a real rush to make all things soy part of our daily regimen. (Also interesting to note, a lot of the high-protien feeds that dairy farmers give their cows to help them produce more milk are soy based).

Anyway, it could be some interesting research and I'll bet that on a forum of this quality we will soon have plenty of info both pro and con.

74 posted on 01/30/2002 4:24:15 PM PST by Pablo64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Archaeus
The supposed increase in cancer, is mostly due to the fact that people are living longer. It also has to do with doctors lookinf for it. In past eras, people diedd, and that was that. Many men die with prostate cancer, but actually die from something else.
75 posted on 01/30/2002 4:32:31 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
Of course, if the average is 13, then then 1/2 of the girls will be younger than that. I am sure that there are plenty of girls developing at 10,11,12. The question is, has the average age dropped. I would love to see a large study on the subject.

I know that this decreasing age of sexual maturity phenomenon is a fact.

I first learned about it about 10 years ago, when I was an undergrad. I was in the library looking for psychiatry textbooks for something that had nothing to do with school. One of the books I came across was a very extensive edocrinology text from the 50's. I found alot of interesting stuff in there so I took it home.

One thing that struck me quite memorably(as the father of a little girl) was the bland statement that, since the turn of the century, the age at which females achieved sexual maturity has declined by approximately six months per generation.

It was in a paragraph in a section about puberty, and specifically precocious puberty. It was a very succint paragraph. It said in about three sentences that the age of female sexual maturity had been declining by six months per generation, there was little or no such decline in boys and that there was not a decline in the females measured mental maturity.

Like babies playing with shotguns.

But, for the last few thousand years, an unmarried girl was an old maid at 18. I seem to recall that New Mexico raised the age of consent from thirteen to something older, about fifteen or so years ago. Elvis, Romeo and Juliet... The 18/21 thing is recent. So I just don't know what I think.

Precocious pubery is rare. If simple plastics caused it, it would be common. Besides, if I were looking for a cause, I would look first at petrochemicals and solvents.

76 posted on 01/30/2002 4:51:09 PM PST by Yeti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #77 Removed by Moderator

To: Hodar
Good points. I think our national tendency to over-medicate almost any illness may have something to do with it. Along with the hormones and medications that their mothers were taking during their formative years.

While I seriously doubt the story of the 18 month old baby menstrating, I would also not be surprised if it were true. Stranger things have happened.

78 posted on 01/30/2002 5:11:11 PM PST by Ronin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
Junk Science
79 posted on 01/30/2002 7:57:54 PM PST by Atlas Sneezed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomson
Why, because I do not see dragons around every corner like PP?
80 posted on 01/30/2002 8:26:52 PM PST by Bella_Bru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson