Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Draping History. Ashcroft orders semi-nude statues covered.
ABC News ^ | January 25, 2002 | Beverley Lumpkin

Posted on 01/26/2002 10:00:54 AM PST by John Jorsett

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: FITZ
This is pretty funny. I wonder when the Pope will have bathing suits painted on those people on the ceiling in the Sistine Chapel.

Actually alot of the "coverings" were removed from the figures in the Sistine Chapel. I think they were on the altar wall.

21 posted on 01/26/2002 10:50:40 AM PST by Straight Vermonter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
"a big Art Deco feature."

Art Deco - the Nadir of American artistic style.

Personally, I don't have a problem with naked statues. On the other hand, ANYTHING which aggrevates liberals has my support!

22 posted on 01/26/2002 10:51:11 AM PST by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
$8,000? Hope he doesn't come to Virginia for a photo op – our State Seal might show up in the pictures.
23 posted on 01/26/2002 10:51:48 AM PST by R. Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
Why do you think he's a leftist.
24 posted on 01/26/2002 10:54:08 AM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
I agree with you. Much ado about nothing.

Are there draperies being put up in the room to hide the statues, or is material being draped over the statues? Either moves makes Ashcroft look uptight while the photographers are just "funnin' ". If it bothered him that much, why not stand somewhere else for photo ops, or move the statues?

Gotta admit, just the mental picture of Mini-Lou's boob, behind Meese as he delivers his report on the commission of pornography, is really quite funny.

Unfortunately, I'll bet a lot of funny photo ops with clinton were missed, or never made it to press.

25 posted on 01/26/2002 10:55:17 AM PST by 1 spark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
It's not easy being a statue in a world full of pigeons.
26 posted on 01/26/2002 10:55:58 AM PST by Dallas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #27 Removed by Moderator

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: Ward Smythe
LOL! I just clicked on the link. It IS funny...and now after seeing it, i think they ought to just move the statue or stand elsewhere.
29 posted on 01/26/2002 11:01:03 AM PST by 1 spark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
I think Ashcroft has more important things to do, like, say.....

see justice done in the matter of campaign finance corruption, which means Chinagate, which means espionage, which means danger to our national security. Or maybe with the matter of the shareholders of Loral being fined while the CEO, the real criminal in the matter, skates free.

Oh, that's right, in this area there is no justice at Justice. Better spend your time covering statues, you sanctimonious fraud.

30 posted on 01/26/2002 11:06:09 AM PST by RJCogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett;tex-oma
LOL. We'll hold people in prisons for indefinate periods of time without charging them with crimes but it would be wrong to see a breast. There's more than alittle wrong with that picture.
31 posted on 01/26/2002 11:24:44 AM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Canavan
Think of the governmental waste that went into making the statue.
32 posted on 01/26/2002 11:25:32 AM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

Comment #33 Removed by Moderator

Comment #34 Removed by Moderator

To: John Jorsett
Why don't they just put the speaker's platform on the other side of the room? Does anybody know if the art will be on display when there are no press engagements? It would be sad that taxpayers can't see what tax dollars bought.
35 posted on 01/26/2002 11:54:01 AM PST by Brad C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #36 Removed by Moderator

To: tex-oma
The draperies installed last week at a cost of just over $8,000.

I'm sure I am totally safe in assuming this little expenditure came out of his own pocket, right?

37 posted on 01/26/2002 12:59:02 PM PST by riley1992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
Any confirmation of this? This smells like an urban legend in the making.
38 posted on 01/26/2002 1:05:10 PM PST by Dimensio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
The proof will be quite evident on the statues if it's true.
39 posted on 01/26/2002 1:14:23 PM PST by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Ward Smythe
I keep forgetting which one makes up their news...

I keep forgetting -- Which is the Taliban. Im sure there are a few Burkas we can borrow to save on the cost of draperies.

40 posted on 01/26/2002 1:16:28 PM PST by mindprism.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson