Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Draping History. Ashcroft orders semi-nude statues covered.
ABC News ^ | January 25, 2002 | Beverley Lumpkin

Posted on 01/26/2002 10:00:54 AM PST by John Jorsett

W A S H I N G T O N, Jan. 25 — About three weeks ago, I received a tip. The attorney general was fed up with having his picture taken during events in the Great Hall in front of semi-nude statues.

He had ordered massive draperies to conceal the offending figures. But initially not only could the story not be confirmed — it was strongly denied.

As some of you may know the Justice Department building was constructed during the 1930s as a WPA project, completed in 1934. The artwork and fittings were strongly influenced by the Art Deco movement. Much of the ornamentation in the building is made of aluminum, apparently a big Art Deco feature.

The Great Hall is basically what it sounds like — a large, even grand, two-story room used for department events and ceremonies. The formal entrance up a winding stairway is adorned with murals depicting great figures in the history of law, including Moses, Hammurabi, and John Marshall.

At the opposite end of the hall, on either side of the stage, are two enormous and stylized but largely naked aluminum statues. On the left, the female figure represents the Spirit of Justice; the male on the right is the Majesty of Justice. The male is clad in only a cloth draped over his essential parts; the female wears a sort of toga-style garment, but one breast is entirely exposed. She's been fondly referred to for years by at least some as "Minnie Lou."

And she's the one the photographers seek out. The most famous pictures of all were shot when former U.S. Attorney General Edwin Meese proudly released the final report of his commission on pornography. No one in the Great Hall that day could ever forget the spectacle of the still photographers writhing on the floor, flat on their backs, in order to grab the shot of Meese holding up the porn report with Minnie Lou's breast over his shoulder.

So there were some who wondered how Attorney General John Ashcroft, known as a strongly religious and conservative man, would get along with the figures once he became attorney general.

For a long time he didn't seem to mind. But last November he and Deputy Attorney General Larry Thompson staged a major event in the Great Hall, to announce their plans for restructuring the Justice Department to address the new challenge of fighting terrorism. Many papers the next day used a photo of the attorney general with — you guessed it — Minnie Lou and that breast right over his shoulder.

According to my original tipster, that was the final straw for Ashcroft, and he ordered that the statues henceforth be draped.

Public affairs people however denied any such thing. They stoutly maintained that the attorney general had never complained and that no draperies had been ordered. They pointed out that periodically, through different administrations, draperies were sometimes rented for particular events.

They noted that former spokeswoman Mindy Tucker always hated the statues; Mindy told me Thursday it was her view that half the women in the department were offended by them and the other half considered them art.

Well, I guess this is a lot of background to get to the point: the draperies have in fact been ordered. Minnie Lou and her mate now can only be imagined. The draperies installed last week at a cost of just over $8,000.

And it turns out that they were indeed ordered by someone in the attorney general's office, who delivered the request to the Justice Management Division and asserted it was the attorney general's desire. I'm told she was the only person in the attorney general's office who knew about it. She's his advance person, and she said it was done for "aesthetic purposes" — she just thought it would look better when staging events in the Great Hall.

So now it appears that rather than making an occasional appearance, the draperies are here to stay — unless and until someone has the temerity to request an event without them.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: FITZ
This is pretty funny. I wonder when the Pope will have bathing suits painted on those people on the ceiling in the Sistine Chapel.

Actually alot of the "coverings" were removed from the figures in the Sistine Chapel. I think they were on the altar wall.

21 posted on 01/26/2002 10:50:40 AM PST by Straight Vermonter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
"a big Art Deco feature."

Art Deco - the Nadir of American artistic style.

Personally, I don't have a problem with naked statues. On the other hand, ANYTHING which aggrevates liberals has my support!

22 posted on 01/26/2002 10:51:11 AM PST by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
$8,000? Hope he doesn't come to Virginia for a photo op – our State Seal might show up in the pictures.
23 posted on 01/26/2002 10:51:48 AM PST by R. Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
Why do you think he's a leftist.
24 posted on 01/26/2002 10:54:08 AM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
I agree with you. Much ado about nothing.

Are there draperies being put up in the room to hide the statues, or is material being draped over the statues? Either moves makes Ashcroft look uptight while the photographers are just "funnin' ". If it bothered him that much, why not stand somewhere else for photo ops, or move the statues?

Gotta admit, just the mental picture of Mini-Lou's boob, behind Meese as he delivers his report on the commission of pornography, is really quite funny.

Unfortunately, I'll bet a lot of funny photo ops with clinton were missed, or never made it to press.

25 posted on 01/26/2002 10:55:17 AM PST by 1 spark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
It's not easy being a statue in a world full of pigeons.
26 posted on 01/26/2002 10:55:58 AM PST by Dallas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #27 Removed by Moderator

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: Ward Smythe
LOL! I just clicked on the link. It IS funny...and now after seeing it, i think they ought to just move the statue or stand elsewhere.
29 posted on 01/26/2002 11:01:03 AM PST by 1 spark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
I think Ashcroft has more important things to do, like, say.....

see justice done in the matter of campaign finance corruption, which means Chinagate, which means espionage, which means danger to our national security. Or maybe with the matter of the shareholders of Loral being fined while the CEO, the real criminal in the matter, skates free.

Oh, that's right, in this area there is no justice at Justice. Better spend your time covering statues, you sanctimonious fraud.

30 posted on 01/26/2002 11:06:09 AM PST by RJCogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett;tex-oma
LOL. We'll hold people in prisons for indefinate periods of time without charging them with crimes but it would be wrong to see a breast. There's more than alittle wrong with that picture.
31 posted on 01/26/2002 11:24:44 AM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Canavan
Think of the governmental waste that went into making the statue.
32 posted on 01/26/2002 11:25:32 AM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

Comment #33 Removed by Moderator

Comment #34 Removed by Moderator

To: John Jorsett
Why don't they just put the speaker's platform on the other side of the room? Does anybody know if the art will be on display when there are no press engagements? It would be sad that taxpayers can't see what tax dollars bought.
35 posted on 01/26/2002 11:54:01 AM PST by Brad C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #36 Removed by Moderator

To: tex-oma
The draperies installed last week at a cost of just over $8,000.

I'm sure I am totally safe in assuming this little expenditure came out of his own pocket, right?

37 posted on 01/26/2002 12:59:02 PM PST by riley1992
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: John Jorsett
Any confirmation of this? This smells like an urban legend in the making.
38 posted on 01/26/2002 1:05:10 PM PST by Dimensio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
The proof will be quite evident on the statues if it's true.
39 posted on 01/26/2002 1:14:23 PM PST by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Ward Smythe
I keep forgetting which one makes up their news...

I keep forgetting -- Which is the Taliban. Im sure there are a few Burkas we can borrow to save on the cost of draperies.

40 posted on 01/26/2002 1:16:28 PM PST by mindprism.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson