Posted on 01/25/2002 7:38:28 AM PST by dalereed
Scientific findings run counter to theory of global warming
Joseph Perkins
SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE
January 25, 2002
Oh dear. What will the doomsayers say now? How will they explain away yet two more scientific studies that clearly contradict the global warming orthodoxy?
For much of the past 14 years, since the United Nations created its Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, we've been warned that human activity is overheating the planet.
And nowhere is that supposed to be more evident than in Antarctica, the proverbial bellwether for planetary climate change.
Indeed, in recent years there have been any number of scary reports claiming that the White Continent is warming up and shedding its ice shelves at a startling rate.
Which has led to the most ominous forecasts by environmental advocacy groups such as the National Resources Defense Council.
Glaciers and polar ice packs will melt," it direly predicts, in its global warming "fact sheet."
"Sea levels will rise, flooding coastal areas. Heat waves will be more frequent and more intense. Droughts and wildfires will occur more often. Andspecies will be pushed to extinction."
So how do the climatory Cassandras on the environmental left explain the new study, appearing in the current edition of the journal Nature, that shows a net cooling, rather than warming, on the Antarctic continent between 1966 and 2000?
What particularly amazes is that the cooling trend has actually gotten more pronounced since the mid-1980s. Air temperatures recorded continuously over a 14-year period ending in 1999 declined by 0.7 degrees in Antarctica's polar desert valleys.
The study's lead author, limnologist Peter T. Doran of the University of Illinois at Chicago, was almost apologetic about the results produced by his team of scientists.
"This is an unexpected twist," he said, tacitly acknowledging that his data is inconsistent with global warming theory.
It's the same thing with the study, published in a recent issue of the journal Science, which concludes that the giant West Antarctic Ice Sheet is actually getting thicker, rather than melting.
Authored by Ian Joughin, a geologist with the Jet Propulsion Laboratory at the California Institute of Technology and Slawek Tulaczyk, a professor of earth sciences at the University of California Santa Cruz, the study found that the ice sheet is gaining 26.8 billions tons of ice a year.
Much like Doran, Joughin sounded almost regretful about his scientific findings, recognizing that it contradicts the global warming orthdoxy.
"It could be this part of the ice sheet is not necessarily sensitive to global warming," he said.
There is a curious thing going on in the scientific community. Scientists who produce research that does not comport with accepted wisdom on global warming – like Doran and Joughin – feel compelled to disavow their findings. Or, at least, to suggest that their results are aberrational.
Indeed, a few years back, the Climate Prediction Center, a division of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, released a study that found the continental United States has actually gotten cooler, rather than warmer, over the past third of a century.
Yet, the scientists who produced the center's study went to great lengths to assure that their findings did not undermine prevailing notions about global warming.
Then there was the study by scientists at Scripps Institution of Oceanography in La Jolla.
They took Antarctic ice core samples from the last three glacial cycles (the transitional periods between ice age and planetary warming) to ascertain the relation between rises in atmospheric levels of carbon dioxide and increases in planetary temperature.
Based on global warming theory, there should first have been a rise in carbon dioxide levels followed by a rise in temperature levels. But, in fact the opposite actually occurred.
Yet, the Scripps scientists insisted that their results were not inconsistent with global warming theory.
It seems clear that much of the scientific community is in denial about global warming. That scientists are so empathetic to the IPCC, the NRDC and other global warming doomsayers that even those scientists who produce research that contradict the global warming orthodoxy are unwilling to admit as much.
Perkins can be reached via e-mail at joseph.perkins@uniontrib.com.
Gore was in office then and they didn't want to lose their grant money. There is NO grant money for global non-warming!
I certainly hope there is no global warming, but have been concerned about changing weather patterns locally....like no winter. Silly me.
When scientists try to minimize the importance of the results of their own studies, there's alot more than science going on.
The global warming theory is slipping slowly, like an icesheet, into the sea.
Last year, I had two feet of snow on my lawn at this time. Today I could have a picnic there.
But if you want to sign international agreements based on the anecdotal evidence of one guy sitting in his house, you'd better make sure you pick the right guy.
There's a guy in Buffalo with 8 feet of snow on his roof.
There we go! That's the spirit. Localized insensitivity to global warming!
However, there is no evidence that warming is due to man made co2. Futhermore, there is no evidence that warming is a bad thing.
Would it help to burn all copies of "Earth in the Balance," or should we retain a few copies to substantiate Al Gore's mental problems?
As the world continues to get colder, you hope that there's no warming?
In 1998, half or more of the urban street trees in New England were destroyed by an ice storm that knocked out power in large areas for up to 10 days. No Winter.
For the past 7 years, record numbers of people have frozen to death, world wide, in larger, and colder than normal storms. - The western United States has essentially not had any summer for the last 4 years, as spring temperatures prevailed through the normally hot summer months.
I think that you have been bamboozled by 'news' media propaganda.
Pet peeve rant: Cassandra was cursed with the ability to foretell the future but no one would believe her. These people have no idea what lies in the future, but just about everyone believes them.
I know Cassandra, and sirs you are not Cassandras.
There, I feel better.
I'm sure that the lying Enviral Nazis will find some way to discredit these new findings which show global cooling.
Or they will just spike these studies with their Goerbel buddies who control the daily fish wraps, the weekly non news mags, and of course CNNCBSABCNBC.
However, with the internet, the world now gets out!
Truth and the broadcasting of truth is the antibiotic of choice to destroy the vile enviralists's infection of America.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.