Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senator Levin wants U.S. out of Saudi Arabia
UPI ^ | 1/16/02 | Pamela Hess

Posted on 01/16/2002 6:00:32 AM PST by truthandlife

Edited on 07/12/2004 3:50:36 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: PhiKapMom
And we want Levin out of the Senate! That is irresponsible for these DemocRATS to keep getting involved in foreign diplomacy matters. Wish they would all stay home and keep their mouths shut.

The Senate, of course, does have a role in foreign policy. But Levin is nit-picking, apparently bent upon creating antagonism where there is none. The Saudis have a problem--as any but a damn fool would realize--in these days of radical fanaticism. (I do not know whether Levin is merely stupid or also malicious.) It is the same problem that is found even in Moslem sectors of London. The greater number of Saudis actually involved in terrorist actions is misunderstood to be a reflection of the attitude of the Royal house, but it is far more likely a reflection of a larger wealthy group than most Moslem countries. Revolution is always the play-thing of the affluent--such as bin Laden. They may recruit others, but the plotters are usually those who have the time to plot, not those struggling to survive.

What Senator Levin is actually promoting is to give bin Laden his principal wish. Surely that is not the proper response at this moment in history. I wonder what can be done in Michigan to make sure the man does not get reelected?

William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site

21 posted on 01/16/2002 3:26:02 PM PST by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: silmaril
Wrong. The Saudis, along with the rest of OPEC, have been desperately trying to get all oil producers to agree to production cuts to ratchet up prices. The reason oil is so cheap? Russia has ignored OPEC (and Saudi demands); they agreed to the cuts, and then failed to comply. Thank Russia -- Saudi Arabia could care less.

Your comment is a thing of the moment. Over the years, the Saudis have striven for more stability in the oil market. Prices are for the moment abnormally cheap again. But when prices have been abnormally high on other occasions, it has often been a Saudi threat to open the flow, that has forced the rest of OPEC to be more responsible. I think that a fair longterm assessment would demonstrate that the Saudis are our friends, and should be treated as such.

Russia is not acting as our friend now, they are simply desperate for Dollars.

William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site

22 posted on 01/16/2002 3:34:21 PM PST by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: weikel
The brother who is our enemy is Abdullah the Crown Prince and religious fanatic.

Yes. Amazingly, he seems to have had at least a small attitude adjustment lately. Who knows, maybe he finally realized that his neck is in the noose right along with the rest of the royal family if the royal family is overthrown. Maybe we look like winners, and he wants to back the winning horse. Or maybe he is just biding his time, waiting to stab us in the back. Time will tell.

If 80% of the population approves of Bin Laden I say about 80% of the population of Saudi Arabia starting with the religious establishment police royals and upper class( except for the few genuinely pro American members) should be shot.

You could get your wish. Ultimately, the rabid anti-Americanism preached by the Wahabbi radicals has to stop. If it does not, eventual confrontation is inevitable.

Personally, I would rather clean up as much of the rest of the worldwide mess as we can first. We need time to rebuild weapon stockpiles (especially cruise missiles) and spare parts. We also need to make sure we have North Korea neutralized, and sufficient force in Taiwan to prevent a Chinese attack. Either place could explode almost without warning if we are perceived as too distracted by war elsewhere to respond.

23 posted on 01/16/2002 3:46:50 PM PST by EternalHope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: EternalHope
Perhaps we should allow Japan to rebuild its military and allow it to handle China. Japan went psycho after WWI after Wilson got them screwed over at Versailles( and forced the British to break alliance with them).
24 posted on 01/16/2002 3:49:33 PM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Ohioan
Thanks for the facts on the Saudi oil. I had remembered over the years that without them, oil prices would have gone through the roof!
25 posted on 01/16/2002 6:18:20 PM PST by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Ohioan
I think that your point about the long-term Saudi influence on oil prices is well-made. However, it ignores a couple of things....

I think that a fair longterm assessment would demonstrate that the Saudis are our friends, and should be treated as such.

Their record is mixed. That's the best one can say for them. Yes, they've (mostly) kept the oil flowing for us. But they cut it off entirely in 1973. And they helped prevent us from finding the Khobar Tower bombers. And their dangerous (and thoroughly anti-American) subsidizing of Wahhabism around the world is well-documented. Go to the MEMRI site and read what the official Saudi press puts out for domestic consumption; it's hardly the rhetoric of a friend. Given this, they deserve to be treated with a great deal of suspicion and caution.

Russia is not acting as our friend now, they are simply desperate for Dollars.

The same may be said for the medieval, tottering House of Sa'ud.

26 posted on 01/17/2002 4:52:30 AM PST by silmaril
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

This article in the LA Times is germaine to this subject.

Glenn Reynolds of InstaPundit.com wrote, "Boo hoo. As a reader comments, this is like the Austrian line that 'Austria was Hitler's first victim.'"

27 posted on 01/17/2002 5:57:15 AM PST by silmaril
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: silmaril
We have a foot hold in Saudi Arabia, so lets just double, triple, quadruple our presence there. Force a coup and this war will be over except for the extended deprogramming and secularization of the country.
28 posted on 01/17/2002 7:45:57 PM PST by duckln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ohioan
Russia is not acting as our friend now, they are simply desperate for Dollars

Also desparate for trade and survival, like any country would be. We have more in common with Russia than we have with the Saudies and many other countries in the world.

Putin stated it best when he said, they, the US, and England ( and I would add Yugoslavia) is the only thing that will save western christian culture from the fanatical onslaught that's being racheted up.

29 posted on 01/17/2002 8:01:12 PM PST by duckln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Rudder
The alternative to Saudi oil is quite frankly American coal and uranium however, we want to delay that choice as long as possible.
30 posted on 01/17/2002 8:36:06 PM PST by Righty1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
I vote we move our base to Bahrain only if they promise to turn around and bomb Saudi Arabia to dust and ashes.
31 posted on 01/17/2002 8:41:02 PM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Righty1
The alternative to Saudi oil is quite frankly American coal and uranium however, we want to delay that choice as long as possible.

Where I live in Ohio (and perhaps surprising to most people) there is abundant gas and oil. The local drillers say that if prices are sustained long enough above 30-35 dollars per barrel drilling here will commence (again.) This is also the case, as far as I know for Pennsylvania, Indiana, Illinois and other midwestern states. Now we add in Texas, the Gulf of Mexico and ANWAR and we just might find enough domestic production to sustain ourselves. Using up the Saudi oil first is, of course, a good conservation practice. Someday, however, it will be that the cost in dollars and political capital for Saudi oil is not worth it. When that someday will be is the question we should try to answer.

32 posted on 01/17/2002 8:58:27 PM PST by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
The senator has a reputation for presenting information that is liberally biased, since I am a conservative I question his assertions. That being the case I researched the Wahhabi and it's relationship to Saudi Arabia. According to http://www.al-islami.com/islam/truth_about_wahhabism.php they claim that the Saudi government does not support this group. With equal skepticism I question their assertions. Since both of them present opposite cases I do not believe either one. Senator Levin very often uses Anti-American rhetoric and promotes socialist positions. The Saudis often use Anti-American rhetoric and promote an Islmaic theocracy. Best advice disregard both positions.
33 posted on 10/02/2002 7:45:41 PM PDT by nicodemus born of spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
The thousands of dead on 9/11 they make a better argument against their Saudi murderers than any of you "zionist hating" crapola. That place is a festering ground for hatred of you and your children. But ninny that you be, so wrapped up in your own biases, you ignore your neighbors blood crying out -- love of hate.
34 posted on 10/02/2002 7:52:33 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Fantasy! Utter fantasy. Idle what-if speculation that your own bias seeks out. The support of hatred and tryrants takes a heavy tax in all eras, direct or indirect -- freedom and liberty drop prices more sure, and Saudi Arabia is afraid of liberty, except when joined with hypocrisy on libertine vacations away from Mecca-land.
35 posted on 10/02/2002 7:58:45 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: bvw
You are replying to a post I made in January? Amazing!
36 posted on 10/02/2002 8:05:38 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Why I did not notice that! How intempusorate of me.
37 posted on 10/02/2002 8:09:57 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: nicodemus born of spirit
Dash and all get out! What a fine mess your late arriving reply has caught me in. My mistake ... but to your point, what kind of balance weighs five drops of blood equal to five quarts of oil? Since both are five in number, are they equal?

They charge us fairly for a barrel of oil, but we are slack to charge them for the piles of blood their culture of hatred left on the sidewalks below the WTC in the mid-morning of Eleven September.

38 posted on 10/02/2002 8:19:07 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson