Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Homosexual Ambassador causing problems.
http://www.frc.org/get/n02a004.cfm ^ | January 7, 2002 | By Fred Jackson and Rusty Pugh

Posted on 01/12/2002 2:14:54 PM PST by GrandMoM

News headline Retrieved

Gay Ambassador Troubles Embassy Staff

Story: Little attention was drawn to Michael Guest's homosexual relationship with his "partner" during his confirmation process as President Bush's ambassador to Romania. However, those working under Guest in Bucharest now find it difficult to avoid his flaunting of the relationship, according to an American embassy worker who recently spoke with FRC.

Although Guest had been active in a gay and lesbian group within the State Department, he was not publicly identified as being homosexual until his swearing-in on September 18, when Secretary of State Colin Powell acknowledged Guest's "partner," Alex Nevarez, during the ceremony.

Nevarez, a former teacher, relocated to Romania with Guest and now lives with him there in the residence provided to the ambassador by the U.S. government.

According to our source, several families in the embassy community have expressed concern about the ambassador's living arrangement, and at least one will no longer bring their children to embassy social events because they do not want them exposed to the example set by Guest and his "partner."

For example, Guest and Nevarez escorted one another as a couple at the embassy's annual Marine Corps Ball, a highly formal event. "It's causing me to have to compromise the values I raise my family by," the source said.

The appointment of Guest to serve in Romania showed a particular cultural insensitivity, given that the country is a stronghold of the conservative Eastern Orthodox Church.

Our source indicated that the Orthodox Church is represented at virtually all government ceremonies in Romania. One Romanian professor, in a letter to a Bucharest daily newspaper, said that "Romanians . . . cannot comprehend homosexual acts in any other way but as a deviation from the natural order and the world created by the Lord," and he noted that the Guest appointment "generates bewilderment, indignation, and disgust among the Romanians."

Romanian laws relating to homosexuality were recently liberalized, but only under coercion from the European Union, to which Romania hopes to gain entrance. Although Guest has denied he will promote a "gay agenda" as ambassador, his mere presence in Bucharest is already having that effect.

Another person serving at the embassy held a meeting in November to encourage leaders of Romania's fledgling "gay movement." And some embassy employees fear that Bucharest will gain a reputation as a "gay-friendly" post, so that more homosexuals will request assignment there. Ambassador Guest's treatment of same-sex "partners" (including his own) as the equivalent of married spouses is a mere half step away from government endorsement of "same-sex marriage." Not only does this violate the spirit of the 1996 federal Defense of Marriage Act (which defines marriage as being between one man and one woman), but it is also a distraction from the important work of our embassy in Romania.


TOPICS: Announcements; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: braad; homosexualagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 381-393 next last
To: arm958
I was making the point that at one time in our nation's history the perversion of sodomy was considered an abomination.

Yes, and so was apostacy and miscegenation. History is remarkable.

241 posted on 01/13/2002 7:05:20 PM PST by Looking for Diogenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: Claud
Yeah funny how people who are Orthodox tend to be conservative.

Serbs are Orthodox and they pay for it.

242 posted on 01/13/2002 7:06:33 PM PST by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Looking for Diogenes
the Romanian government is pragmatic enough to realize that they are getting the best person for the job

The Romanian government may feel that way (although I doubt it), but you can be certain that the Romanian people don't. Sodomy is overwhelmingly frowned upon in Romania. Do a little research and you will see.

243 posted on 01/13/2002 7:08:14 PM PST by arm958
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: Looking for Diogenes
In reference to post 237, I wasn't talking about either Romania or Luxembourg. Admittedly, my question was on a tangent to this thread, but please address the question.

Why would the governments and peoples of Switzerland and Ireland be offended by the particular persons appointed to be American Ambassadors to those countries?

And while we are at it, how would offending the citizens of one country by our government's [un]diplomatic ambassadorial appointments justify offending another's?
244 posted on 01/13/2002 7:08:30 PM PST by VietVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

Comment #245 Removed by Moderator

To: ninenot
The Romanian Orthodox Church is HARDLY the same as the Greek Orthodox Church. For openers, the Romanian Orthodox are united with Rome--that is, they recognize the primacy of the Pope. The Greeks don't.

It is utterly false. Romanian Orthodox Church is in Communion with Greeks and Russians. Is not united with Rome. There are some Uniates in Romania - probably the source of your confusion.

246 posted on 01/13/2002 7:10:17 PM PST by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: Looking for Diogenes
NATO leaders took toward a decision next year on what countries share our value system and should be invited to join the Alliance

I start to wonder. "Our value system", "joining the Aliance". Are those the code words?

247 posted on 01/13/2002 7:14:42 PM PST by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: JMJ333
***I realize I've been threatening to with-hold my vote from the republicans for a while now. I'm going to make good on it. ***

...and vote Democrat?

248 posted on 01/13/2002 7:18:47 PM PST by homeschool mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RonPaulLives
Bump for later reading.
249 posted on 01/13/2002 7:18:49 PM PST by RonPaulLives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: sikinetik
Well I don't recall Colin Powell being Secretary of State during Clinton.

Wait a minute! I never knew Colin Powell is gay!

250 posted on 01/13/2002 7:40:36 PM PST by Austim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: arm958
The Romanian government may feel that way (although I doubt it), but you can be certain that the Romanian people don't.

Here is what the representative of the government says:

In Washington, Romania's ambassador to the US, Sorin Ducaru, told the Washington Times: "This was  no surprise to the Romanian government. This is a non-issue. He is a highly respected diplomat, and we knew he would come with his partner. Knowing Ambassador Guest, I very much appreciate his character and his great professionalism."

251 posted on 01/13/2002 7:43:15 PM PST by Looking for Diogenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
What's the difference between a NON-PRACTICING homosexual and a NON-PRACTICING heterosexual? I have objection to neither as priests, bishops, or pope. If they're NON-PRACTICING, how would you know?

I've concluded that you're incredibly naive.
252 posted on 01/13/2002 7:44:39 PM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Tolerance of various sexual preferences is growing. That trend will not be reversed. Homosexual marriage will be a fact in this country in 20 years in all probablility. It might be a fact for all practical purposes in California this year. If you check out the polls on the topic, you will find a very sizable generational difference.

Indeed...those who indoctrinate our children through the public school system have succeeded beyond their WILDEST dreams.



253 posted on 01/13/2002 7:45:39 PM PST by who knows what evil?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: VietVet
Why would the governments and peoples of Switzerland and Ireland be offended by the particular persons appointed to be American Ambassadors to those countries?

The government might be offended because they are not getting a legitimate diplomat, but rather a businessman who was chosen because he donated a lot of money to some political campaigns. These countries are probably used to it because the western European nations are plum assignments, especially for a rich man who can entertain lavishly. I'm not sure that France or England have ever had a career diplomat. The real work probably is carried out by lower ranked staff.

I doubt most people in a nation think very much about the ambassadors that other nations send to them. How many current ambassadors to the US can you name of the top of your head?

254 posted on 01/13/2002 7:48:39 PM PST by Looking for Diogenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
I've concluded that you're incredibly naive.

So, tell me how a non-practicing homosexual is different from a non-practicing heterosexual.

And tell me exactly how you know what you're about to tell me.

I've known lots of priests in my life, some no-doubt gay. I had suspicions about some of them, but, because they really were on the up-and-up about their commitment, I never knew.

Given the venom you've spewed against homosexuals, and the fact that you STILL haven't provided any evidence about Dag Hammerskjold being a "sodomite," I tend to take what you say on this subject with a huge grain of salt.

255 posted on 01/13/2002 7:50:00 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: ChosenAtLarge
ragic events? It was a military attack on the US! Tragic, indeed, but the first word out should be "an attack!"

I agree with you entirely. I just did a 'Google' search on "Tragic events of September 11." You wouldn't believe how often that term has been used. It makes the attack sound like an unfortunate natural disaster.

256 posted on 01/13/2002 7:51:12 PM PST by Looking for Diogenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: homeschool mama
***I realize I've been threatening to with-hold my vote from the republicans for a while now. I'm going to make good on it. *** ...and vote Democrat?

That's NOT the only option; although I am the first to admit that the winning candidate will be a democrat or republican in most instances. It is just a matter of how you are willing to go to compromise your principles.



257 posted on 01/13/2002 7:51:56 PM PST by who knows what evil?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
I start to wonder. "Our value system", "joining the Aliance". Are those the code words?

Code words for?

258 posted on 01/13/2002 7:52:45 PM PST by Looking for Diogenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: who knows what evil?
***and vote Democrat?*** was in response to another poster claiming he/she would not vote Republican again. But I understand what you're suggesting. ;o)
259 posted on 01/13/2002 7:58:59 PM PST by homeschool mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

Comment #260 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 381-393 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson