Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BULLETPROOF: REAGAN AFTER HINCKLEY (Was There a Historic Presidential Epiphany That Day?) TV REVIEW
The New York Times ^ | December 7, 2001 | Leslie Camhi

Posted on 12/07/2001 8:42:00 AM PST by Silly

Who's minding the store?" Ronald Reagan joked to his top aides as they watched the president being wheeled into surgery, a bullet from the gun of a would-be assassin, John W. Hinckley Jr., lodged in his chest. The three men, James A. Baker III, Edwin Meese III and Michael K. Deaver, recall this remarkable bon mot in "Bulletproof: Reagan After Hinckley," a gripping documentary about the attack, which occurred a mere 70 days into his first term.

Did Mr. Reagan, an accomplished actor, become a "real" president in its aftermath? Did this assassination attempt by a deranged individual help bring about the end of the cold war? Using a combination of archival film, simulated re-creations and interviews with eyewitnesses, policy makers and journalists, "Bulletproof," directed and produced by Tom Casciato, takes a sobering look at events tinged with surreality and focuses on the broad dimensions of a single day in history.

Mr. Reagan appears in movie clips from his Hollywood years as a football hero, a cowboy, a Secret Service agent and even the occasional bad guy, taking the fall over cash. But he was most convincing playing himself, as television host or presidential candidate, and that blending of image and reality became a hallmark of his administration.

On March 30, 1981, as he was leaving a meeting hall in Washington, six shots rang out; three men lay bleeding on the sidewalk while the wounded president's limousine raced to the hospital. David Gergen, director of communications during Mr. Reagan's first administration, identifies the crisis as "a naked moment," when the president's grace under pressure revealed the man's essence. But it's also apt to say that he remained in character.

Despite disarray and confusion, Mr. Reagan's staff managed the flow of information about his health so carefully that few knew his life hung in the balance. In that sense, "Bulletproof," produced by The New York Times and presented by Showtime, provides a valuable corrective. The program's few simulated re-creations, so ubiquitous in television docudrama, are only slightly jarring. Its most moving moments occur in interviews with Mr. Brady, Reagan's press secretary, who was shot and permanently disabled by the attack, and with his wife, Sarah, an eloquent advocate of gun control.

Mr. Reagan's popularity soared after of the attack, and his advisers used it to push a series of tax cuts and other legislative victories through Congress. But did his brush with death also produce a "spiritual epiphany," as Mr. Deaver suggests, that led him to negotiate with Mikhail S. Gorbachev for nuclear disarmament? It's a tempting hypothesis, especially in the current climate of renewed presidential prestige and world crisis. Yet in dealing with the Soviet Union, Richard Allen, Mr. Reagan's national security adviser, says, "His theory was, `We win and they lose.' " And in that case, at least, he was right.

BULLETPROOF
Reagan After Hinckley
Showtime, Sunday night at 8
Produced and directed by Tom Casciato; Amanda Benchley and Susan Morrison, associate producers; Jane Bornemeier and Christian Gwinn, executive producers; produced by The New York Times; presented by Showtime.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
On Sunday night, Showtime will air this program. Perhaps those who subscribe to that channel could take a look and report back:

QUESTIONS TO KEEP IN MIND:
Does it tell us anything new, or give us any new insight?
Is it respectful to Reagan, or hopelessly biased?

1 posted on 12/07/2001 8:42:00 AM PST by Silly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Reaganites, please send this to your ping lists and keep this bumped.
2 posted on 12/07/2001 9:00:50 AM PST by Silly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Reaganites, please send this to your ping lists and keep this bumped.
3 posted on 12/07/2001 9:01:01 AM PST by Silly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Reaganites, please send this to your ping lists and keep this bumped.
4 posted on 12/07/2001 9:01:13 AM PST by Silly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Reaganites, please send this to your ping lists and keep this bumped.
5 posted on 12/07/2001 9:01:33 AM PST by Silly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Reaganites, please send this to your ping lists and keep this bumped.
6 posted on 12/07/2001 9:01:48 AM PST by Silly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Reaganites, please send this to your ping lists and keep this bumped.
7 posted on 12/07/2001 9:06:08 AM PST by Silly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Reaganites, please send this to your ping lists and keep this bumped.
8 posted on 12/07/2001 9:45:36 AM PST by Silly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Silly
Did Mr. Reagan, an accomplished actor, become a "real" president in its aftermath?

No, he WAS a real President before he was shot. The only thing that changed was that he became firmly committed to doing the will of God.

I love to see these liberals squirm because Dubya is acting a lot like Dutch. And the contrast between them and Clinton is SO obvious that anyone with any semblence of a brain has to notice it. So, kids get used to it. The liberals are coming up with their own analyses of The Gipper. It must be very painful for them to admit that he was a decent guy. We must pity them. I just wish they wouldn't act like they are the first to discover Ronald Reagan was not an evil warmonger and that he actually may have done some good.

9 posted on 12/07/2001 1:17:34 PM PST by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joanie-f; ReaganWasRight; Minuteman23
BUMP
10 posted on 12/08/2001 6:24:35 AM PST by WhatPriceFreedom?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Silly
Did Mr. Reagan, an accomplished actor, become a "real" president in its aftermath?

Well, I'm pretty sure he was a real Prresident before as well.

Did this assassination attempt by a deranged individual help bring about the end of the cold war?

Oh yeah. Ronald Reagan didn't win the cold war....John Hinckley inspired him to do it.

Where's the barf alert?

11 posted on 12/08/2001 6:48:28 AM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Silly
[Sarah, an eloquent advocate of gun control]

Must be another Sarah Brady. The one I've seen is an incoherent, asinine drooler who can't articulate a complete sentence without lapsing into a cigarette cough. Eloquent, she ain't.

12 posted on 12/08/2001 7:05:26 AM PST by Twodees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhatPriceFreedom?
I'll watch it, but I'm not optimistic that it will be fair.
13 posted on 12/08/2001 4:58:03 PM PST by ReaganWasRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Silly; All
So, did anyone watch this last night?
My review:
I thought the movie itself, The Day Reagan Was Shot, was a bit over the top. Maybe Gen. Al Haig really was a frothing lunatic, I don't know, but that's how Richard Dreyfuss portrayed him. George H.W. Bush and Reagan were portrayed as amiable dunces, in my opinion (Reagan only slightly less so). Deaver, Meese, Baker and Nancy Reagan received some respect. The hero was the ultra-liberal doctor who saved Reagan's life despite political differences.

The documentary preceeding concluded Reagan felt he had been spared for a purpose and he accomplished that purpose when the Cold War ended. They showed the great "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" footage, which brought a tear to my eye. I didn't find anything about the Bradys to be touching. They sat there on camera and argued. The narrator reminded us about ten times that Brady now is a gun control proponent.

14 posted on 12/10/2001 11:36:56 AM PST by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer
Thanks -- no surpises, but a good read.
15 posted on 12/10/2001 11:39:58 AM PST by Silly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Twodees
Sarah Brady went after the wrong target when her husband's wound disabled him permanently.

Untreated mental illness not a gun caused Hinckley to shoot Reagan & the others.

Thanks to the liberals, people with mental illnesses cannot be hospitalized nor compelled to take medication unless they are proven to be a 'danger to themself or others'; then a Judge can order such treatment.

Hinckley had a history of mental illness but his parents were unable to force compliance. Even today it is a long legal battle for families to get mentally ill adult relatives committed for treatment.

Too bad Sarah Brady wasn't smart enough to recognize the real cause of the shooting......instead of attacking the 2nd Amendment, she should have focused her efforts on mental illness!

16 posted on 12/10/2001 11:52:30 AM PST by JulieRNR21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer
All I saw was a promo last night showing a scene with Richard Dreyfuss as Alexander Haig (!), and the gag reflex kicked in. Sickening.
17 posted on 12/10/2001 11:53:31 AM PST by Jhensy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Silly
I didn't see this show but have seen Dreyfuss all TV over promoting it & his portrayal of Haig.....please see my post #61 regarding Bradys.
18 posted on 12/10/2001 11:55:04 AM PST by JulieRNR21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JulieRNR21
You are right. The number one cause of suicide is untreated mental illness. Good catch.
19 posted on 12/10/2001 11:56:21 AM PST by Silly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer
The hero was the ultra-liberal doctor who saved Reagan's life despite political differences.

How patriotic of him!

20 posted on 12/10/2001 11:57:44 AM PST by carton253
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson