[lafroste]

Good Lord, what a shock it would be if OJ really was innocent!

[Keith]

and of course, the housepainter was using OJ's blood in his mix, and just happened to dabble a little bit of it everywhere...

[eastsider]

It would bump the War on Terrorism to p.2 ... : )

[PoorMuttly]

A new career move for OJ...training actors on how to act guilty.

[Protagoras]

Good Lord, what a shock it would be if OJ really was innocent!

I think you can relax, you won't be shocked. If this guy was the "real killer" OJ would have caught him by now.

[SerpentDove]

>>Wonder how many people would have to eat their words if it is found out OJ is innocent?<<

BWAHAAAHAAAHAAAHAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAA...etc.

Seriously...(drying eyes on shirtsleeve)...Read Daniel Petrocelli's book "Triumph of Justice." He was the attorney against O.J. in the civil trial, which Juice lost quite emphatically, to the tune of 33 million. In the civil trial, O.J. was found responsible for the deaths of Ron Goldman and Nicole Simpson.

If you read the evidence that was in that trial which (for some reason) was excluded from the criminal trial, including O.J.'s DISASTROUS moments on the stand, there is no way anyone with an I.Q. above room temperature can come to any other conclusion than O.J. did it with his own hands.

I have friends who refuse to look at the facts; they have pre-determined that O.J. couldn't have done it, because of whatever irrelevant reason.

But anyone who is HONESTLY (and I mean that, HONESTLY) interested in the truth should read that book.

If anyone vigorously defends him while refusing to look at all the evidence..well..I won't waste my time arguing with fools.

[Abbalon]

It would be a shock to those who did no consider all the evidence including a cop who admitted in taped interviews that he and his cohorts planted evidence many times in cases they knew couldn't be prosecuted otherwise. Wasn't that the same cop caught climbing the fence before his superiors told him to? Wasn't it he who found the bloody glove. One forensic expert testified that the blood on OJs sock was planted after the fact because if he had had it on his foot the blood would have not soaked through like it did. I got to get to the archives and save some OJ post before they are all gone.

[Sueann]

First of all, I believe it was brought out in court that a blood sample was given to the police by OJ, and therefore leaves the door open for the blood to have been planted. I'm not saying it was, but people who hate blacks will do some squirly things to try to prove the black guy did it.

Secondly, I have always believed OJ was at the scene - but remember he was supposedly out jogging - and he was known to spy on Nicole. He may have really been there, after the fact; and he certainly would have checked to see if either of them were alive before leaving - thereby leaving a footprint. OJ could not stay there and report the murder, because he knew people would accuse him; and besides, he was there spying on her which wasn't a good thing.

I'm prepared for incoming - but I never have believed he did it. If you see the arthritus in his hands and knees, you would know he was physically incapable of performing such physically demanding murders. Both Nicole and her friend were restrained - this had to be by someone either high on drugs or in great physical shape.

And ... even during the famous 911 call Nicole made, OJ is never heard hitting her (although he had done so before) or throwing things - just yelling. Believe me, I can tell you from first-hand experience, battery is terrifying. I can therefore understand her reluctance to believe he would not do the same again. But, during that 911 call, he did not touch her in any way.

[ladyinred]

NO WAY, OJ did this crime, he just isn't doing the time. The housepainter couldn't get OJ's blood at the scene, and Nicole and Ron's blood mingled together in OJ's Bronco, and on and on.

[WatchOutForSnakes]

bump