Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Painter for Nicole Brown Had Serial Murder Background
'Cross Country Killer' -The Glen Rodgers Story ^ | December 5, 2001 | Joyce Spizer and Claude Rodgers Jr.

Posted on 12/05/2001 7:22:24 AM PST by codebreaker

The Cross Country Killer, the Glen Rodgers story provides an insighful look into the mind and making of an American predator.

Glen Rodgers, twice on America's most 10 Wanted List, is currently on Death Row in Florida.

He brags about having killed 70 people, one of which may have been Nicole Brown Simpson.

Could it be a coincedence she was murdered just after meeting Glen?

There are witnesses who saw them partying together and there's even a photo of them together.

A sad but fascinating story that will keep you mesmorized till the end.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 341-355 next last
To: f.Christian
So, let me get this straight, now, both you and Marcia Clark, are more reliable than say, Dr. Henry Lee ? who testified as to the questionablility of the alleged footprint evidence?

P.S. considering that the Bronco was under police control for quite some time, and there was ample evidence of evidence tampering/planting......

161 posted on 12/05/2001 10:29:18 AM PST by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker
Well obviously there's some sort of frenzied rage. People don't kill other people when they're happy smurfs in smurfland, they especially don't kill 70 people over the course of a number of years. When I steal the FBI term frenzied attack it's a reference to the style, the quickness, the brutality, and the emotional expression. As I said, the history of serial killers shows that it's pretty rare for an experience killer to do that kind of high tempo freak out. Not unheard of, but rare. Generally as they gain experience and confidence serial killers get more mean and calculating. One of the other big signs is facial destruction. Stranger killers almost never go after the face of their victims, it doesn't bother them to be "looked at"; relationship killing almost always completely mutilate and destroy the face of their victims, they hate to be "looked at" by some one they knew. That right there is probably the most OJ damning clue of all, that Nicole's face was pretty well obliterated.
162 posted on 12/05/2001 10:29:21 AM PST by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: orfisher
Not automatically. Even in criminal cases, for example, when DNA proves that a convicted rapist didn't do it, they don't just let the guy out of jail that night. The verdict has to be superseded by reopening the case.
163 posted on 12/05/2001 10:31:01 AM PST by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
I can quote from memory most of the evidence and facts in the case

Perhaps I missed this, but can you tell me, who was the man who went out for ice cream with Nicole and the kids shortly before the murder. I don't remember him being named much less giving testimony.

164 posted on 12/05/2001 10:35:48 AM PST by christie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker
Colonel Mustard in the libary with the candlestick. That's my guess. OJ is innocent.
165 posted on 12/05/2001 10:36:47 AM PST by Busywhiskers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eastforker
I don't know what it would take to convince you if Nichol's and Goldman's blood were in the Bronco and in OJ's bathroom and OJ's blood was in Nichol's Courtyard. Because that is what transpired!
166 posted on 12/05/2001 10:38:57 AM PST by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: christie
Actually, I'm unsure as to the name, the striking thing about the Ice cream, is that, it was found, and discarded by the police. Given the temperature of the evening it would have been a further clue as to how late she was alive. Guarenteed it was after 11 pm.
167 posted on 12/05/2001 10:44:35 AM PST by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: wingnuts'nbolts
Ummm, lets see, blood in the Bronco, hmmmm perhaps someone carrying a glove from the Crime scene?

Hmmmm, Blood on the gate, lets see a detective carrying a blood sample From the place it was drawn, and SUPPOSED to be booked, back to the crinme scene?

And both of those Police lied on the stand about several matters, so their veracity is questionable.

168 posted on 12/05/2001 10:46:46 AM PST by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: mlo
There was quite an effort to conceal evidence. OJ handed a bag to Kardashian on tape. That was never seen again. Someone washed clothes. Kato said a group of people came over the house and intimidated him. Etc. etc.

The trial was set up to fail. OJ was not tried by a jury of his peers. The prosecutors did their best to fail. The judge was a joke. Want more?

169 posted on 12/05/2001 10:47:20 AM PST by Chemnitz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: discostu; f.Christian; FreeTally
Heres a glimpse of the court order re: crime scene and coroners photographs

It is beyond explanation that one guy could inflict the listed damage WITH NO DAMAGE TO HIMSELF as documented by the Defense photos taken when he came back from Chicago.Period.

170 posted on 12/05/2001 10:49:12 AM PST by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: jgoode
LBJ had Rodgers on the grassy knoll??
171 posted on 12/05/2001 10:49:28 AM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CJ Wolf
should have warned me that was an anti-death penalty web site, just about lost my lunch. These people should be forced to view detailed before and after pictures of the handywork of scumbags like Rogers.

This excerpt shows a methodical method dissimilar to what happened to Nicole. Though it's hard to check one crime against another, circumstances can change things a lot. Especially with someone that has the history of violent behavior of Rogers it's best to look at the big picture. Spot the trends. Is he regularly into knives? Does he tend to twist the knife? What type of mutiliation does he do? How frenzied are his attacks? How into overkill is he? Stranger or acquaintance? Sexual assault or not (if yes pre or post mortem)?

Then, with all those trends you can look at Nicole and Ron and do a comparison, how do these killing compare with his trend. You know the presence of Ron is going to screw things up a little but if their killings are completely the opposite of his trend you've got to say he didn't do it. And you still must alway keep in mind the DNA evidence, OJ's trying to leave the country with a fake beard and lots of cash, the tendency of how abused women are killed, the continued violent behavior OJ has shown since the trial, the lack of concern about the crime (remember he swore to do all he could to find the real killers, then spent the next 2 months on the golf course).

That's the stuff that to me seals it. The abused women statistics say that there's a 90% chance OJ was the killer right off the bat, no physical evidence or anything else at that point. An abused woman was murdered, when that happens it's usually the abuser. And since that day OJ has acted guilty. He tried to flee, he got freaky on the witness stand (got even freakier on that call in show a few months ago, it was one of the BET shows, can't remember much of it, other than OJ got really wierd, called her a bitch and then said he stilled loved her) and he's shown not the least bit of concern with seaking justice for the murders (while still proclaiming to love her). Even if you say that all of the physical evidence was planted all the pre-murder and post-murder behavior says OJ did it.

172 posted on 12/05/2001 10:52:10 AM PST by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
I don't know what is dumber--uglier...his lies or the people who believe him!

28 posted on 12/3/01 3:08 AM Pacific by f.Christian

173 posted on 12/05/2001 10:52:45 AM PST by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Old Hickory
"Yep a painter was wearing Bruno Magli shoes which cost over $200 / pair on average."

hey, i have a pair of Bruno's. they cost more than $200 new, but i paid $35 for them at Second Looks in Austin. i'm not joking. and i've seen more than a few pairs of those things there. they are very nice shoes and anyone with the money who was looking for dress-shoes would have bought them. i don't know how common OJ's were, but they are a pretty popular shoe.

174 posted on 12/05/2001 10:54:07 AM PST by paulsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: codebreaker
House Painter for Nicole Brown Had Serial Murder Background

What a coincidence, eh?

Her cocaine-snuffling ex husband was/is a bit of a serial killer, too!

A knife murderer!

175 posted on 12/05/2001 10:56:20 AM PST by Brian Allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
Wouldn't the last person known to have seen Nicole be a suspect. Couldn't be the house painter, by any chance?

Also, let's assume the ski cap, the gloves, and the Brunos all belonged to OJ. If someone had swiped them from his house, who would have noticed? Not in June for sure. And why would anyone wear a ski cap in June in LA? The entire world knows OJ and a ski cap is going to disguise him?

The ice cream is curious, as is also the fact they tossed Nicole's stomach contents.

176 posted on 12/05/2001 10:57:02 AM PST by christie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Keith
and of course, the housepainter was using OJ's blood in his mix, and just happened to dabble a little bit of it everywhere...

I read that OJ's blood sample was taken the day after the crime, but rested next to the crime scene evidence in the same unguarded police station locker for ninety days before they did the DNA testing.

If any particular black-hating cop were to 'help' the OJ case by dabbing OJ's blood sample on the crime scene evidence, it would certainly look like OJ was there at the time, and bleeding profusely. This was the basis of the DNA-tampering defense.

It would be mind-blowing if Dershowitz turned out to be right for once. But then he had to defend a conservative Republican to do it!

177 posted on 12/05/2001 10:58:49 AM PST by JoeSchem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
For crazy people, all ideas no matter how bizzare--insane are more than reasonable.

Evidence--facts don't matter---argue opinions--personalities--fantasy---like you!

178 posted on 12/05/2001 10:59:42 AM PST by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: wingnuts'nbolts
Here's a bit of the transcript from Det. Vannatter's testimony:

Q. And when you got the blood sample, what type of container was it in?
A. It was in a purple top vile.
Q. Did it have any markings on it?
A. Yes. There was a tag that was put on it with Mr. Simpson's name and the date and time it was drawn.
Q. Who put that on?
A. The nurse.
Q. What time was it drawn?
A. I could look at the record and tell you exactly. I don't -- I don't know the exact time. It was between 3:00 and 3:30 approximately.
Q. Between 3:00 and 3:30?
A. Yeah, something like that.
Q. And after you took that blood vile, what type of security did you use for that blood vile?
A. I placed it in a manila envelope, maintained control of it and hand delivered it to the criminalist.
Q. Where was the criminalist?
A. At Rockingham.
Q. How did you know that?
A. Because I knew that the search warrants -- the execution of the search warrant had started at approximately after 12:00 noon, and I knew that there were still officers at the location and believed that he was at the location also.
Q. You believe, but you didn't know?
A. Well, I didn't know for certain.
Q. You didn't call him and say are you at the location, I've got some blood to bring to you?
A. No. I didn't talk to him on the phone.
Q. You didn't call anybody there in charge to see where the criminalist was?
A. No.
Q. And there were many areas where criminalists could be; isn't that correct?
A. I knew he was either -- either at Bundy or Rockingham, yes.
Q. You didn't know which one of the two?
A. Well, I assumed Rockingham, because I knew the search warrant had started after 12 noon.

later

Q. Isn't it true that the only accounting for time that is recorded is the time the blood was drawn, which you say is 3:30 and the time that you logged in at Rockingham, which is 5:20, almost two hours?
A. That's correct, yes.

later

Q. How many times have you taken blood from Parker Center out to a crime scene?
A. I don't know. This may have been the first time. I don't know. I can't recall right now any other times that I've done that.

later

Q. Thank you. You examined the index finger of Mr. Simpson and observed it to have a cut which you've demonstrated here; is that correct?
A. Yes.
Q. And I take it you examined the left-hand glove at Bundy; is that correct?
A. I didn't. I had it examined.
Q. And was a cut found on the left-hand glove at Bundy that would be in the area of the cut on O.J. Simpson's left hand?
A. No.

179 posted on 12/05/2001 11:02:38 AM PST by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
Have you ever read the "opinion" by a man named Sherman Scholnick? I will admit he is a kook, and his writings are out there, but they make for an interesting read. Coincidentally, there are always things in his writings that would be impossible to verify because he always speaks of people who "do not officially exist" to put it in so many words. If you haven't, go to conspiracynation.com and click on either "best of" or "better of" and look for the O.J. stuff.

To sum up what he claims, Nicole was involved in some kind of drug ring that may ultimately implicate high level LAPD officers. Furman, Lang and some guy who "doesn't exist" went over to "question" he about Faye Resnicks recent arrest. Things got ot of hand, and Furman, Lang and the other guy(Nathan someone) kill her and Ron comes upon it and gets whacked too. The obvious plot is to frame O.J.

Im not saying I believe this, but its interesting. The essays are a long read, and they tie Furman and Lang into the "Rodney King staged riots". If you got a few hours, give it a read.

180 posted on 12/05/2001 11:03:13 AM PST by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 341-355 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson