Posted on 12/05/2001 7:22:24 AM PST by codebreaker
1. Why, there on the monitor, did the blood show up on the sock almost two months after a careful search for evidence? And why, as demonstrated by Dr. Lee and Professor MacDonell was the blood applied when there was no foot in it? Do you think that is a fair question in this case? Let's see if she can answer that question.
No. 2. Why was the glove still moist when Fuhrman found it if Mr. Simpson had dropped it seven hours earlier? As Agent Bodziak told you, as herb MacDonell has told you, blood dries very rapidly.
3. Why did the Prosecution not call a single police officer to rebut police photographer Rokahr's testimony that Detective Fuhrman was pointing at the glove, before, before Fuhrman went to Rockingham? That is around 4:30 in the morning.
4. If the glove had been dropped on the walkway at Rockingham ten minutes after the murder, why is there no blood or fiber on that south walkway or on the leaves the glove was resting on? Why is there no blood in the 150 feet of narrow walkway or on the stucco wall abutting it? And you ever been back there.
No. 5. For what purpose was Vannatter carrying Mr. Simpson's blood in his pocket for three hours and a distance of 25 miles instead of booking it down the hall at Parker Center?
No. 6. Why did Deputy District Attorney Hank Goldberg, in a desperate effort to cover up for the missing 1.5 milliliters of Mr. Simpson's blood, secretly go out to the home of police nurse Thano Peratis without notice to the Defense and get him to contradict his previous sworn testimony at both the grand jury and the preliminary hearing? Peratis was never sworn. We were never given notice.
7. Why, if according to Miss Clark he walked into his own house wearing the murder clothes and shoes, there is not any soil or so much as a smear or drop of blood associated with the victims on the floor, the white carpeting, the doorknobs, the light switches and his bedding?
8. If Mr. Simpson had just killed Mr. Goldman in a bloody battle involving more than two dozen knife wounds where Mr. Goldman remains standing and struggling for several minutes, how come there is less than seven/tenths of one drop of blood consistent with Mr. Goldman found in the Bronco?
No. 9. Why, following a bitter struggle allegedly with Mr. Goldman, were there no bruises or marks on O.J. Simpson's body? And you will have those photographs back in the jury room.
No. 10. Why do bloodstains with the most DNA not show up until weeks after the murder, those on the socks, those on the back gate, those on--those are the two major areas.
No. 11. Why did Mark Fuhrman lie to us? Why did Phil Vannatter lie to us?
12. Given Professor MacDonell's testimony that the gloves would not have shrunk no matter how much blood was smeared on them, and given that they never shrank from June 21st, 1994, until now, despite having been repeatedly frozen and thawed, how come the gloves just don't fit?
I'll answer your questions but basically you are asking me why was the score only 12 to nothing...police fumble--stole the ball---were going for 1st down on 5th--punting the ball to each other...the score should have been 10,000 to nothing---nobody thought they were walking into---playing an insane asylum team--you!!
How do you explain sanity-Truth-reality to crazy prople--animals--murders--psychos??
Oh yeah--they used poor OJ for the football??
Where are the phone records we were promised??
"For the word-TRUTH of God is living and active,
and sharper than any two-edged sword,
and piercing as far as the division of soul(lies) and spirit(virtue),
of both joints and marrow,
and able to judge the thoughts(denials) and intentions(spin) of the heart(wicked)."
Hebrews 4:12
Better put your pea shooter-pen back in your wholster--comic strip Mr. hobbes1!
335 posted on 12/11/01 12:40 PM Pacific by hobbes1
This should be in the lexicon of the FR..."cheese grater/knashers"---rats in the corner--dancin doing the flips-spin!
Of course, this new guy was a painter and he used drop cloths to cover his tracks and trap OJ!
119 posted on 12/5/01 10:37 AM Pacific by f.Christian
Defended him all the way until finally she snapped out of the spell she was under!
She said the first inclination was...how hard it was for OJ to put the glove on---and then he slipped it off in an instant.
Last week I was flipping through the channels and I got some amateur--retarded magician on, that botched his act! He pulled the bird out of the air...put it in cage and then pulled the curtain over the cage and surprise---pulled off--UP the curtain, and on two levels he had the bird upstairs and the rabbit down. His assistant because he was "oblivious" to his abortion, walked over and fixed it...just the rabbit! Maybe it was a comedy(magicians never divulge their secrets) act because I missed the beginning!
She definitely got over thinking OJ was God. She even became a Christian(born again)!
344 posted on 12/12/01 9:55 AM Pacific by hobbes1
a reasonable doubt, that is the standard of Justice...
"Reasonable" has to be in the realm of sanity--reality...
and talk about a "standard" of trees(facts)---forest(verdict)...
you are LOST--hanging--chirping in the jungle of one tree---yeah OJ world of lies/fantasy!
When your feet hit the ground...you can walk 10 feet out of the jungle in any direction--
so small is your/his world--"laid out in tHIS country".
BTW...Marcia Clark pratically said she could rest this case on the fact the blood from the flat surfaces of OJ"s..."I-never-wore-those-ugly-ass-shoes" were on the walkway from the bodies to the back/side alley bronco(with his cut finger dropping blood all the way)---
the much more important fact of this crime/evidence---that the blood(Nicole Smith/Ron Goldman) ugly-ass-shoe print on the carpet of his bronco floor, was the blood imprint from the upward grooves on the bottom of said shoes--feet--person!
To the insane reasonable/unreasonable means what ever you want it to mean---there is "no standard"/justice!
Post/pre civilization---THE JUNGLE/ape!
The test...your standard is public taste--stupidity...OJ&Clinton in Wonderworld--water(dumb) seeks its own level(lowest)!
344 posted on 12/12/01 9:55 AM Pacific by hobbes1
a reasonable doubt, that is the standard of Justice...
"Reasonable" has to be in the realm of sanity--reality...
and talk about a "standard" of trees(facts)---forest(verdict)...
you are LOST--hanging--chirping in the jungle of one tree---yeah OJ world of lies/fantasy!
When your feet hit the ground...you can walk 10 feet out of the jungle in any direction--
so small is your/his world--"laid out in tHIS country".
BTW...Marcia Clark pratically said she could rest this case on the fact the blood from the flat surfaces of OJ"s..."I-never-wore-those-ugly-ass-shoes" were on the walkway from the bodies to the back/side alley bronco(with his cut finger dropping blood all the way)---
the much more important fact of this crime/evidence---that the blood(Nicole Smith/Ron Goldman) ugly-ass-shoe print on the carpet of his bronco floor, was the blood imprint from the upward grooves on the bottom of said shoes--feet--person!
To the insane reasonable/unreasonable means what ever you want it to mean---there is "no standard"/justice!
Post/pre civilization---THE JUNGLE/ape!
The test...your standard is public taste--stupidity...OJ&Clinton in Wonderworld--water(dumb) seeks its own level(lowest)!
119 posted on 12/5/01 10:37 AM Pacific by f.Christian
240 posted on 12/7/01 1:34 PM Pacific by f.Christian
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: eastforker
You're stupid.
241 posted on 12/9/01 5:38 PM Pacific by jgoode
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: eastforker
Did I mention that?....You are stupid?
242 posted on 12/9/01 5:39 PM Pacific by jgoode
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: Chemnitz
You are an idiot.
243 posted on 12/9/01 5:40 PM Pacific by jgoode
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To: CJ Wolf
You were born yesterday, right? Say hello to the Easter Bunny for me...you idiot.
244 posted on 12/9/01 5:44 PM Pacific by jgoode
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
............post #245.....................................................................................................
To: codebreaker; hchutch; Anitius Severinus Boethius; Silly; CJ Wolf; Carol-HuTex; TheCPA; hobbes1...
The jury is in, here's the tally, and OJ did it ...
Here's how the jury voted (forgive me if I got your position/stand on OJ's guilt/innocence wrong):
--- OJ Didn't do it ----
hchutch Anitius Severinus Boethius codebreaker CJ Wolf Carol-HuTex TheCPA hobbes1 Mossy Thunder Busywhiskers chantal7
--- Thinks it's possible he didn't do it (other killer) ---
lafroste Jewels1091 Dr. Frank ExpatCanuck Aurelius TBall knews_hound christie Smogger
-- Police frame-up ---
Abbalon FreeTally JoeSchem Protect the Bill of Rights janeliberty
--- OJ Did it, but, trial/evidence was botched ---
hchutch commish
--- OJ Did it, but, the police added evidence ---
gridlock
--- OJ Had help/hired someone ---
Chemnitz eastforker FreeTally Plummz
Psycho killer goes free...has associates/sympathizers---scary(zombies)!
Welcome to the age of Clinton--Buttafuco-Oj-Potter heads!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.