Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"THE REPACKAGING OF MARGARET SANGER"
Wall Street Journal | May 5, 1997 | Steven W. Mosher

Posted on 12/01/2001 12:28:35 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse

I was personally offended when Planned Parenthood recently announced plans to give its Margaret Sanger Award to the BBC documentary "The Dying Rooms."

Don't get me wrong: The documentary is a wonderful and courageous piece of work. An undercover camera crew managed to gain entry to China's state-run orphanages and videotape the mistreatment and murder of the girls there. I appeared in the documentary, testifying that this tragedy is a direct consequence of the country's one-child policy.

It was the award, named after Planned Parenthood's founder, to which I objected. For Sanger had little but contempt for the "Asiatic races," as she and her eugenicist friends called them. During her lifetime, she proposed that their numbers be drastically reduced. But Sanger's preferences went beyond race. In her 1922 book "Pivot of Civilization" she unabashedly called for the extirpation of "weeds .... overrunning the humnan garden"; for the segregation of "morons, misfits, and the maladjusted"; and for the sterilization of "genetically inferior races." It was later that she singled out the Chinese, writing in her autobiography about "the incessant fertility of [the Chinese] millions spread like a plague."

There can be no doubt that Sanger would have been wildly enthusiastic over China's one-child policy, for her "Code to Stop Overproduction of Children," published in 1934, decreed that "no woman shall have a legal right to bear a child without a permit ... no permit shall be valid for more than one child." As for China's selective elimination of handicapped and abandoned babies, she would have been delighted that Beijing had heeded her decades-long call for exactly such eugenicist policies.

Indeed, Sanger likely would have turned the award on its head, choosing to praise publicly rather than implicitly criticize China's government for its dying rooms. Even the inhuman operators of Chinese orphanages might have gotten an honorable mention, in order to underline the importance of their front-line work in eliminating what she called the "unfit" and "dysgenic." Sanger was not one for subtlety in such matters. She bluntly defined "birth control," a term she coined, as "the process of weeding out the unfit" aimed at "the creation of a superman." She often opined that "the most merciful thing that the large family does to one its infant members is to kill it,", and that "all our problems are the result of overbreeding among the working class."

Sanger frequently featured racists and eugencists in her magazine, the Birth Control Review. Contributor Lothrop Stoddard, who also served on Sanger's board of directors, wrote in "The Rising Tide of Color Against White World-Supremacy" that "We must resolutely oppose both Asiatic permeation of white race-areas and Asiatic inundation of those non-white, but equally non-Asiatic regions inhabited by the really inferior races." Each issue of the Birth Control Review was packed with such ideas. But Sanger was not content merely to publish racist propaganda; the magazine also made concrete policy proposals, such as the creation of "moron communities," the forced production of children by the "fit," and the compulsory sterilization and even elimination of the "unfit."

Sanger's own racist views were scarcely less opprobrious. In 1939 she and Clarence Gamble made an infamous proposal call "Birth Control and the Negro," which asserted that "the poorer areas, particularly in the South ... are producing alarmingly more than their share of future generations." Her "religion of birth control" would, she wrote, "ease the financial load of caring for with public funds ... children destined to become a burden to themselves, to their family, and ultimately to the nation."

War with Germnay, combined with lurid tales of how the Nazis were putting her theories about "human weeds" and "genetically inferior races" into practice, panicked Sanger into changing her organization's name and rhetoric. "Birth control," with its undertone of coercion, became "family planning." The "unift" and the "dysgenic" became merely "the poor." The American Birth Control League became the Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

Following Sanger's death in 1966, Planned Parenthood felt so confident that it had safely buried her past that it began boasting about "the legacy of Margaret Sanger." And it began handing out cutely named Maggie Awards to innocents who often had no inkling of her real views. The first recipient was Martin Luther King-who clearly had no idea that Sanger had inaugurated a project to set his people free from their progeny. "We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the Minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members," Sanger wrote Gamble. Had Dr. King known why he may have been chosen to receive the award, he would have recoiled in horror.

The good news is that Sanger's-and Planned Parenthood's-patina of respectability has worn thin in recent years. Last year Congress came within a few votes of cutting a huge chunk of the organization's federal funding. The 1995-96 Planned Parenthood annual report notes that it has closed up shop in Mississippi, and that the number of its staff and volunteers has fallen by 4,000 over the previous year.

Perhaps the next time the Maggie Award is offered to someone of character and integrity-and more than a passing knowledge of Sanger's bigotry-he will raise an indignant cry of refusal. He will have ample grounds.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: margaretsanger; plannedparenthood
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-129 next last
To: He Rides A White Horse
Careful, pcl will start calling you a liar, and send you strange freepmails...;-D
101 posted on 12/25/2001 2:14:26 PM PST by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: He Rides A White Horse
Ever since I you decided I was Black, you have hounded me about anything and everything.
102 posted on 12/25/2001 3:22:58 PM PST by pcl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
Careful, pcl will start calling you a liar,

No. I only call people liars when it can be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that they have lied such as was done here and here.

The White Horse Ridder is a pcl stalker just like you. His motivation is racial. Yours is simply an obsession.

103 posted on 12/25/2001 3:44:50 PM PST by pcl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: pcl
Gee, you sure are persecuted, aren't you? And I don't think I was talking to you. Need a lot of attention, do you?
104 posted on 12/25/2001 3:56:30 PM PST by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: pcl
And thanks for the links. They prove my point, not yours. But if you want to post them, fine with me. ;-D
105 posted on 12/25/2001 3:57:48 PM PST by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
Gee, you sure are persecuted, aren't you?

Maybe you could explain why you need to persecute me.

The very first post you made on FR was a pcl bash. You have continued in that fine tradition with dozens upon dozens of bashes, personal attacks, lies and more lies.

What is it that is missing from your life that is compensated for by stalking and persecuting me? I do not think you are racially motivated like White Horse. What could it be?

106 posted on 12/25/2001 4:07:58 PM PST by pcl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: pcl
The exact same reason I swat flies, spray for roaches, set mousetraps and disinfect the bathroom--I hate germs.
107 posted on 12/25/2001 4:16:49 PM PST by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
I hate germs.

Peace be with you.

108 posted on 12/25/2001 4:20:45 PM PST by pcl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: philetus
Too bad the law wasn`t in effect and Margaret`s mother was refused a permit.

or Hillary's mother, likewise.

109 posted on 01/21/2002 7:59:53 AM PST by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: He Rides A White Horse
Thank you for posting this.
110 posted on 01/21/2002 8:09:54 AM PST by syriacus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: helmsman
For your perusal.
111 posted on 02/02/2002 3:45:20 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: He Rides A White Horse
These people hide behind words; a policy geared towards ideas such as "creating supermen", and "eliminating the 'dysgenic'" has evolved into 'pro-choice', and 'personal freedom'.........

A lot more politically correct than Hitler turning the same phrases into "master race" and "subhuman." The fascio-elitists have learned to hide their intentions in clever rhetoric, but the theme remains the same..."I am superior, and therefore, I will either control or kill you."

112 posted on 02/02/2002 3:55:21 PM PST by ez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: He Rides A White Horse
If it's possible to laugh in Hell, Margaret will be extremely amused that the politically correct press now considers her a hero of the past, despite her obviously racist views.

I wonder what Jesse Jackson has to say?

113 posted on 02/02/2002 4:24:26 PM PST by helmsman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: helmsman
If it's possible to laugh in Hell

I wouldn't count on too much laughter there, personally........(g)

114 posted on 02/02/2002 4:28:35 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: ez
The fascio-elitists have learned to hide their intentions in clever rhetoric, but the theme remains the same..."I am superior, and therefore, I will either control or kill you."

You know them. It's always the same in a debate..........they'll weave a bunch of convoluted arguments, and when you don't "understand" them, why it's because you must be 'intellectually inferior', and unable to grasp their 'wisdom'.

It would be a funny thing if they never acted on these fallacious attitudes........but they do.

115 posted on 02/02/2002 4:32:56 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: He Rides A White Horse
Roger that. There is nothing more dangerous than a deluded do-gooder.

I think people would be surprised to learn that one of the goals of the elite, world socialists is to reduce the world's population to 1 billion. How do you think they might accomplish that goal?

FReegards...

116 posted on 02/03/2002 8:58:21 AM PST by ez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: ez
I think people would be surprised to learn that one of the goals of the elite, world socialists is to reduce the world's population to 1 billion. How do you think they might accomplish that goal?

Something tells me that it wouldn't be very 'funny' either.

FReegards to you as well.

117 posted on 02/03/2002 9:03:36 AM PST by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Happygal
Since you asked, a little background information on this 'all-American' organization.
118 posted on 04/08/2002 8:52:00 PM PDT by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
Margaret Sanger
119 posted on 12/03/2004 10:34:28 PM PST by Diago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

Ping for later pingout.


120 posted on 12/03/2004 10:38:19 PM PST by little jeremiah (What would happen if everyone decided their own "right and wrong"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson