Skip to comments.
"THE REPACKAGING OF MARGARET SANGER"
Wall Street Journal
| May 5, 1997
| Steven W. Mosher
Posted on 12/01/2001 12:28:35 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-129 next last
To: pcl
Actually, I think this stands on it's own merits. What say you?
To: BMCDA; walden
Come on down...the Christian "Taliban" awaits.........
To: He Rides A White Horse
Good post.
To: He Rides A White Horse
There are ample arguments against abortion outside of religion, like the eugenics one presented in this article. No where does this article bring up religion. But, I'm glad the horror of Sept. 11 and its aftermath were able to provide you with a groovy new phrase: Christian Taleban. You use it like a teenager with a new cell phone: flashing it whenever possible, though there's little need for it.
To: He Rides A White Horse
Hey, if a guy named liberallarry is on your side, you can't be wrong.
To: liberallarry
It's the truth.
To: He Rides A White Horse
I cannot and will not read this or any article about Margaret Sanger. What she and her ilk have done and still do to this world makes me so angry my vision blurs and I need four or five aspirin to get right.
8
posted on
12/01/2001 12:51:05 PM PST
by
Petronski
To: No Left Turn
But, I'm glad the horror of Sept. 11 and its aftermath were able to provide you with a groovy new phrase: Christian Taleban.My usage was purely sarcastic...........note the quotation marks.
Comment #10 Removed by Moderator
To: He Rides A White Horse
didn't get the sarcasm. I'm disarmed.
To: No Left Turn
It's okay.......personally, I think we can demonstrate who the real Taliban is.
To: He Rides A White Horse
*Catholic_List
To: He Rides A White Horse
Great post.
To: He Rides A White Horse
Thanks for posting this excellent article. Is this level of honesty and quality typical to the WSJ?
To: Petronski
I cannot and will not read this or any article about Margaret Sanger. I hope more people do.............the real Margaret Sanger, however.
It's policy of genocide, relative morality, and every other foul thing you can think of.
To: He Rides A White Horse
Why is a guy named liberallarry agreeing with this article? Am I just bad at picking up on sarcasm today?
To: MitchellC
I'm not what you would call a regular reader of the WSJ, mitchell; however, I came across this some time ago doing research on the subject, and I thought it really laid bare the soul of the so-called "pro-choice" movement.
To: Petronski
I'm with you. In college, the femi-nazis had their little "Women's History Month" profiles, and she would be among the prominent ones. I ripped down each one I could find, or would find some articles, such as the one above, and tape those up, highlighting her words. It was one of the few times when I was able to clear the webs from some idiot liberal friends of mine when shown what her words actually were.
This is the scary thing about liberals - the fact that they lie and attempt to cover up the true intent of their ideas. It was either this article, or one similar to it, in WSJ which prompted Sanger's own son to write in to defend. He denounced every quote, in spite of the fact that her words were well published.
19
posted on
12/01/2001 1:01:56 PM PST
by
GreatOne
To: He Rides A White Horse; No Left Turn
It's okay.......personally, I think we can demonstrate who the real Taliban is. Ideological repent vs. progressist planification is the key.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-129 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson