Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Witchcraft' Murders Cast A Gruesome Spell
Washington Post ^ | November 28,2001 | SAO LUIS

Posted on 11/28/2001 10:12:40 AM PST by electron1

Edited on 09/03/2002 4:49:35 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

In his mind's eye, the image of what Jose Antonio Serra saw in a burned patch of jungle on the Amazon's edge is still chillingly fresh -- not because the murder happened just seven weeks ago, but because there are some things a father can never forget.

What he found, a short walk from his family's mud hut, were the remains of his 13-year-old son: a figure on its knees, head buried in the dirt, genitals and middle figure removed with cuts that looked almost surgical. In shock, Serra noticed an odd detail: The mutilated body looked diminished, even shrunken. Then he noticed the gash in the boy's jugular vein, and realized that his blood had been drained.


(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 261-271 next last
Comment #181 Removed by Moderator

To: alpowolf
They are fake spells. The children can see that; why can't you? Of course you could always prove me wrong. Let's see you do the spells.

To get real potions and spells would be a quick click on the net. You may try if you want to. I am not that foolish anymore. Do you just want to come out and laugh at the wiccans and satanist and tell them otherwise, because they take their faith seriously. And if so maybe you should debate them.

182 posted on 11/28/2001 10:56:28 PM PST by MSCASEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: lexcorp
Are you a satanist?
MCD
183 posted on 11/28/2001 11:14:51 PM PST by MSCASEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: lexcorp
What are you finding difficult to understand? Or do YOU believe that Harry Potter actually contains magic?

Just mimics magik to closely in some parts and glamorizes it.
MCD

184 posted on 11/28/2001 11:32:37 PM PST by MSCASEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: lexcorp
>We are free to "go around" God by disobeying the First Commandment and engaging in occult practices. Bwah? "Thou shalt have no other gods before me." Doesn't say squadoo about occult practices, it says "other gods." There were and continue to be many Christians who engage in the occult without theological conflict. The two are not mutually exclusive.

Would you like some scripture that does talk about magik and other occult pratices? Probably not because if you know what they say you will not be able to use a post like that one again.
MCD

185 posted on 11/28/2001 11:37:25 PM PST by MSCASEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: Ward Smythe
Harry Potter is the Devil" hysteria is more damaging to the cause of Christ than the actual book or movie ever will be.

I think that it is not hysteria. People are trying to sound an alarm. There have been in the past few years more and more occult shows, occult symbols all around us. Was it Alice Bailey that said through her demonic entity D.K. that we have to desensitize slowly down to the lowest level of society (meaning children) before her god satan could come. I know that was not the exact quote but it is close enough.

What are your thoughts on the possession that occurs in Harry Potter by the evil Lord V? He is an evil spirit that posses an eleven year old child. And there are other instances of his possession also as you have pointed out. The things that are used in the books are actually used in wiccan practices. The courses the children are taking are actual things used. Were do these children get their power from in these books?
MCD

186 posted on 11/29/2001 12:13:38 AM PST by MSCASEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

Comment #187 Removed by Moderator

To: Phantom Lord
Son of Satan or Son of God. No middle ground? What about those that don't believe in either? Me, not being one of them.

Read the bible. I don't recall any middle ground. You will either take the mark in your right hand or in your forehead or you will die for your faith. Gee doesn't Harry have a mark in the middle of his forehead? And isn't it a lightning bolt in the middle of Harry's forehead?

Jesus said "I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven". Luke 10:18
MCD

188 posted on 11/29/2001 12:46:39 AM PST by MSCASEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Faith_j
You have mail!
MCD
189 posted on 11/29/2001 12:53:30 AM PST by MSCASEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: Outlaw76
I realy didn't think you would. Tell me, do you believe in the bible? As a whole, or just part of it? Tell me also, what makes you think you can judge if I have or have not read the bible? You couldn't even tell me what book that came from.

A question mark means that one is asking a question, it looks like this ? Therefore when one uses a question mark it is not a declaritive sentence. And therefore can not be a judgement!(Exclamatory Sentence!)

Couldn't= Could not meaning something one can not do. Wouldn't=Would not something one may not wish to do, but is quite capable of doing so.

I would not answer your question and allow you to try to compare a Harry Potter a book about a wizard with the bible a book that is devinley inspired and speaks of the days that we are in.

Were you shocked and surprised by September 11. I wasn't. Sadend yes! Why do you think my son would ask me in August "Mom how soon before the war is going to begin". It is all in the book. Some of us know the truth and that is why we are mocked, as it also said that in the book.
MCD

190 posted on 11/29/2001 1:17:53 AM PST by MSCASEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Ward Smythe
I see the moderator has removed Mr. Vega's post, which is unfortunate. Ironically even though the tone was nasty and yes, offensive to Christians, nothing Vega said was necessarily untrue.

Is it only because the moderator has taken it off that now you say the tone was nasty and offensive? Earlier you sided very heavy with Mr. Vega never questioning his post. By the way it was all untrue. It was a preverted account. Do you really believe his statements were true?
MCD

191 posted on 11/29/2001 1:54:37 AM PST by MSCASEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

Comment #192 Removed by Moderator

To: MSCASEY
The things that are used in the books are actually used in wiccan practices. The courses the children are taking are actual things used. Were do these children get their power from in these books?

Not according to "real" wiccans. And the "power" is make believe, just like the fairy godmother in Cinderella.

193 posted on 11/29/2001 2:52:30 AM PST by Ward Smythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: MSCASEY
Earlier you sided very heavy with Mr. Vega never questioning his post. By the way it was all untrue. It was a preverted account.

Quote to me where I sided with Mr. Vega. Read all of my posts on this thread - I just did again. I never took his side, but challenged you on the fact that you set yourself up as his judge.

In essence he said that the God of Israel required blood sacrifice, then sent his son to fulfill that. Now that's a big 'ol paraphrase and I won't get into an argument over how he said it, since it's not here anymore.

But no, it was not "all" untrue. It was, as you say a "perverted" account - but a perversion of the truth.

But the issue was never with what Mr. Vega said. It was with your response in calling him the son of Satan. It was out of line. It was viscious. It was malicious. It was ugly. And it was inappropriate in this forum shared by people of all faith.

Yet you keep avoiding that and accuse me of siding with Mr. Vega and accuse me of bashing Christians. In other words, you're perverting the truth - and you condemned Mr. Vega to hell for doing just that.

194 posted on 11/29/2001 3:08:48 AM PST by Ward Smythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: Nakatu X
However, if they aren't, then why is it any different than the other Old Testament rules Christians don't follow anymore (I'm sure you know what I'm referring to)... why were we not freed in from those specific Jewish "terms of the convenant" when Jesus made the convenant with the whole world?

The objection to self-mutilation is based on a natural law argument. It is intrinsically evil to harm the proper functioning of your body.

Now, it's pretty easy to see that amputating one of your fingers is disordered and impairs the proper functioning of your body. What about smoking three packs of cigarettes a day? That seems to impair the proper functioning of your body too. What about 1 pack? Once cigarette? There is something of a continuum here.

The same principle applies to tattoos and ear-piercing. Inasmuch as they increase your risk of developing an infection, they can be considered an evil, but they don't seem to impair proper body function. They're a marginal and borderline case.

The argument isn't based on Levitical law.

195 posted on 11/29/2001 3:11:51 AM PST by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: lexcorp
>We are free to "go around" God by disobeying the First Commandment and engaging in occult practices. Bwah?

In the sense that we have free will, we are free to "go around" or disobey God's commands.

"Thou shalt have no other gods before me." Doesn't say squadoo about occult practices, it says "other gods."

Is this Bill Clinton?

196 posted on 11/29/2001 3:15:12 AM PST by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

Comment #197 Removed by Moderator

To: gumbo
Thanks, but could you provide more details, e.g., involving what, an arm? And the bad guy drinks blood!? (And this is a childrens' book?!)

This occurs in a brief 3 or 4 page chapter. One of the bad guys/wizards is mixing up a potion in a cauldron in order to bring about some effect. I forget what. Anyway, he pulls out a knife, leans over the kettle, steels his will, and lops off his arm which falls into the potion. "Plop." That "completes" the spell. Maybe someone else here can fill in the details.

In another book, a mysterious hooded character leans over a dead unicorn and drinks its blood.

198 posted on 11/29/2001 3:20:29 AM PST by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Ward Smythe
If these books are so bad, how and why do you know so much about them?

I became concerned when I heard that teachers were reading books dealing with witchcraft to their students. Then I learned that three of these children's books dealing with witchcraft occupied the top three spots on the NY Times best-seller list for several months.

If anything else, these books are a huge cultural phenomenone, and should be the subject of intense scrutiny by Christians.

199 posted on 11/29/2001 3:30:09 AM PST by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
I see. That is a much better/more logical argument than 2sheep's reply 26 on this thread. Thank you for taking the time to explain your position more fully.
200 posted on 11/29/2001 3:34:56 AM PST by Nataku X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 261-271 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson