Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nakatu X
However, if they aren't, then why is it any different than the other Old Testament rules Christians don't follow anymore (I'm sure you know what I'm referring to)... why were we not freed in from those specific Jewish "terms of the convenant" when Jesus made the convenant with the whole world?

The objection to self-mutilation is based on a natural law argument. It is intrinsically evil to harm the proper functioning of your body.

Now, it's pretty easy to see that amputating one of your fingers is disordered and impairs the proper functioning of your body. What about smoking three packs of cigarettes a day? That seems to impair the proper functioning of your body too. What about 1 pack? Once cigarette? There is something of a continuum here.

The same principle applies to tattoos and ear-piercing. Inasmuch as they increase your risk of developing an infection, they can be considered an evil, but they don't seem to impair proper body function. They're a marginal and borderline case.

The argument isn't based on Levitical law.

195 posted on 11/29/2001 3:11:51 AM PST by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]


To: Aquinasfan
I see. That is a much better/more logical argument than 2sheep's reply 26 on this thread. Thank you for taking the time to explain your position more fully.
200 posted on 11/29/2001 3:34:56 AM PST by Nataku X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson