Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kudlow: A Quarter Away?
National Review Financial ^ | 11/26/2001 | Larry Kudlow

Posted on 11/26/2001 11:34:39 AM PST by Pokey78

Better times may be coming a lot sooner than folks think.

A consensus of economic forecasters anticipate that economic recovery will occur in next year’s second half, and bolder forecasters believe evidence of a recovery could surface in next year’s second quarter. But the recent upturn in Treasury rates suggests that recovery could surface as early as the first quarter. That’s right, the first quarter.

Here's some evidence: After falling for over a year, Treasury rates have suddenly headed upwards, with both nominal and inflation-adjusted Treasury rates reversing direction in the past two weeks.

Changes in the direction of interest rates often signal turning points in the economy. When rates are falling, people tend to postpone spending and investing decisions in search of the interest-rate bottom. Holding back until financing costs have hit their low point, people have an incentive to defer economic activity, and this deferral effect coincides with economic slumps.

That’s pretty much been the story for the U.S. economy over the past eighteen months. When rates turn up, however, people frequently accelerate their economic activity. This acceleration effect comes from the incentive to beat higher financing costs that are likely to occur in the future. Right now, this acceleration effect could be starting to happen, and it may signal a turning point in the economy.

Real interest rates in the government securities market have suddenly jumped between 35 and 100 basis points, while market rates have increased roughly 65 basis points across-the-board. Interest rates are forward-looking indicators; much better forecasting guides than backward-looking GDP or other government statistical releases. Treasury rates in particular are especially sensitive to shifts in inflation, taxes, and economic growth.

A forecasting model using the five-year inflation-protected Treasury security (TIPS), which matures in July 2002, is actually predicting an annual rate of 3.8% economic growth in both the first and second quarters of next year, following a 2% decline in this year’s fourth quarter. This model uses the five-year TIP as a coincident indicator of real GDP growth.

Of course, the model may be irrationally exuberant, overstating the recovery case. But even if first-quarter growth comes in at 2%, that would be a surprise. Stronger-than-expected and sooner-than-expected economic growth implies an earlier-than-expected rebound in corporate profits.

That is exactly what the forward-looking stock market could be telling us. From the September 21 low, the S&P 500 is up nearly 20%. The leading sectors are classic cyclical recovery growth areas: technology (40%), consumer cyclicals (29%), capital goods (27%), transportations (26%), basic materials (23%), and financials (19%).

While Congress has not yet passed its so-called stimulus package, there’s a lot of stimulus emerging from our dynamic and resilient economy. Price-cutting is occurring all over the place: lower financing rates, cheaper autos, heavy discounting by retailers (clothing stores and various home furnishings), all manner of technology-related price drops, and energy price declines.

Gasoline price drops are a major stimulant. By some estimates, every $0.10 decline in pump prices increases consumer disposable income by $15 billion. Since May gas prices have fallen about $0.50. Do the math: it’s a $75 billion stimulus package. And don’t forget the big price drops in electricity and natural gas, which have contributed to positive profit margins over the past five months for goods-producing firms.

Add to that the efforts of the Federal Reserve, which has been a busy little beaver this year (especially since 9/11). The basic liquidity measure controlled by the Fed, the monetary base, has expanded by 9% year-to-date. Last year it deflated by 3%. Along with declining interest rates, that’s a big turnaround in monetary policy from excessive restraint to substantial stimulus. With the two-year Treasury now yielding 100 basis points above the fed funds rate, there is no need for additional central bank easing measures.

As yet, there is absolutely no evidence of recovery in the business sector. Industrial production and business equipment investment are still falling. That’s why accelerated depreciation and small business tax-cuts (nearly one-third of personal taxpayers are small businesses) are still necessary. You can’t consume what you don’t produce. True consumer purchasing power always stems from investment and production.

However, tax cuts are surely coming before year-end. And another tax-cut-like effect is developing from the good news on the war front in Afghanistan. As the noose tightens, the war-uncertainty tax declines. As people at home feel more comfortable about domestic security, the war-tax effect falls even more.

So, while business is still lagging, the interest-rate signal suggests that better times are coming. And they may be coming a lot sooner than folks think.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 11/26/2001 11:34:39 AM PST by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Believe it.

Venture capital was dead dead dead this February. Now it is showing signs of life. In 6 months things will be pretty darn good.

2 posted on 11/26/2001 11:41:44 AM PST by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Kudlow's joking, right?
3 posted on 11/26/2001 11:44:17 AM PST by Tuco-bad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tuco-bad
Kudlow is one of the best. If he is SURE of it, as he seems pretty sure of in this column, you can take it to the bank.....sorry Tuco, that also means Republican gains in BOTH houses next November...Daschole better enjoy it while he can, his little fuhrerdom is about to end...
4 posted on 11/26/2001 11:48:23 AM PST by Keith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Keith
Kudlow is one of the best.

Indeed, Kudlow is the best economic analyst around, IMHO. I wish GWB would replace Larry Lindsay or Paul O'Neill with Larry Kudlow and some other true supply-sider. That's exactly what this economy (and this administration) needs right now!

5 posted on 11/26/2001 12:56:00 PM PST by ReleaseTheHounds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
In addition to his wisdom in financial matters, Kudlow is worth listening to because of his remarkable personal story, from major player in the Treasury Department to alcoholism and drug abuse to a religious conversion that rivals that of St. Augustine and St. Ignatius.
6 posted on 11/26/2001 2:10:37 PM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spoosman
What happened to the FED sinking everything?
7 posted on 11/26/2001 3:05:25 PM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tuco-bad
No economic issue, war on terror, now, if Dubya can only fix Social Security, we'll run the table in `02.
8 posted on 11/26/2001 5:18:35 PM PST by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Bump for Kudlow. I hope he's right, and he usually is. If this article comes to be true, we're gonna have an economy on the upswing just in time for midterm elections.

Imagine the horror of the Democrats when they realize that we have a President who can run a war and a domestic economy at the same time. (Bush Sr. could too...it's just that no one bothered to tell the public.)

There are some signs of hope that things could be turning around in the media, though. I was listening to an ABC radio affiliate today, and the top story at the top of the hour was the "official recession." The story talked about the recession ending the record-breaking 10 years of economic growth that "began during the Presidency of George Bush." I nearly choked on my lunch.
9 posted on 11/26/2001 8:32:12 PM PST by July 4th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Bump.
10 posted on 11/26/2001 9:07:53 PM PST by July 4th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
Prices did sink, but we are witnessing the cartel manipulating everything they can think of to cover their butts: 9/11/01 to shock the market into a 'bottom', and a hyper-extreme, massive expansion of credit.

But the cause (market manipulation through monetary inflation) of the economic downturn is not the cure (monetary inflation). For now, people think that is going to work. The boyz have this thing all juiced up in the 4th Q, and are suckering people in with false expectations for 2002.

But we lose either way, because even though we are witnessing a temporary rally off the lows, the price pressure created by the monetary inflation will continue to abort any economic recovery. It is just the nature of the game. Eventually the economic stalemate created by monetary inflation will cause productivity and prfitability do decline further, until finally we see a substantial asset price break.

Right now the cartel 'appears' to be doing everything they can to keep an asset meltdown from happening, but I really doubt they are dumb enough to fall for their own propaganda. At some point they'll slowly grind the market down until thet get what they want.

Banks have a lot to worry about because 65% of all residentail purchase money is based upon the hyper-inflated valuations of the last 2 years. When we throw in refinancing, we are close to 100%. If RE assets break by 40% - 50% that means a vast majority of RE loans will greatly exceed the value of the underlying asset, and will likely spark a massive amoun of foreclosures, and huge losses to the banks. This could lead to across he board bank failures. Which would lead to a complete economic disaster, which means the purported benefit of a fiat ponzi game run by the creeps at the cartel was no benefit at all.

So there is a motivation here by the cartel to do something to save their butts, even though even they must know eventually the cause (monetary inflation) is not the cure (monetary inflation), which means they have to work this thing into the hole so they do not lose their position.

We have a long way to go, down, but geez, after all this suffocating BS in the 4th Q, it could take at least 9 months to get past 9/01 lows. In the meantime the economy will be under seige, held hostage to the artificially created high prices the cartel inflation creates, prices that organic market forces are working their relentless, but painfully sloe process to breakdown. Not much one can do except wait, and sell rallies here and there.

Right now they are playing a technical game under 10K on the DOW, the 4th Q has pretty much been conceded and given to the buyers. heck, I was a buyer in Sep at the lows,but those trades are long gone now. It is a stubborn market, and people are not that bright. It looks like we have to wait an awfully long time for them to find out that whatever their expectations were for 2002, they just are not going to pan out. The pervasive denial as to the reality of what is going on is what creates this inordinate delay.

I thought, maybe, we'd get to the bottom of this process this year, but the global elite is still rigging, manipulating and playing games, 9/11/01 being the centerpiece of it all. So, here we go again.

Lastly, the attempt by the treasury to manipulate the bond market by killing the 30y T-Bond failed. I think that is a sign that all of this other manipulation will fail as well. It just takes a lot longer because the stock market and the stupid gullible public are much ewasier to manipulate than bond traders.

11 posted on 11/27/2001 6:57:14 AM PST by spoosman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: spoosman; Tasha
Interesting times.
12 posted on 11/27/2001 7:04:51 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
efforts of the Federal Reserve, which has been a busy little beaver this year (especially since 9/11). The basic liquidity measure controlled by the Fed, the monetary base, has expanded by 9% year-to-date. Last year it deflated by 3%

How were they able to do that?

13 posted on 11/27/2001 7:39:38 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spoosman
Ditto. Stocks are still more overvalued than at the 1929 top. The average family has an $8000 credit card balance on top of a mortgage and car payments. That is not a good place to start a recovery.
14 posted on 11/27/2001 7:46:40 AM PST by OK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ReleaseTheHounds
Larry Lindsey is perhaps the most knowledgable scholar of the Reagan economic program, whose research on the subject was published as The Growth Experiment. Kudlow spent his time studying the effects of cocaine on an amoral hedonistic yuppie. He'll be sticking to his cheerleading for the god of global trade.
15 posted on 12/29/2001 12:18:10 AM PST by Pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: spoosman
Eventually the economic stalemate created by monetary inflation will cause productivity and prfitability do decline further, until finally we see a substantial asset price break.

I'm glad you're not my broker.

Your opinion has sucked for the last two years.

It still sucks.

16 posted on 12/29/2001 12:18:11 AM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
bump
17 posted on 12/29/2001 12:18:12 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bvw
One way the Fed can affect the monetary base is by buying and selling its bond holdings into the secondary market. If the Fed sells a bond, it 'sops up' liquid money by exchanging an illiquid bond for it. This has a deflationary effect on the monetary base. And if the Fed buys a bond, it expands the monetary base by "creating" cash to exchange for the bond. Essentially the Fed is effecting the monetary mix, changing it from cash to bonds, bonds to cash. During the Carter years the Fed was buying bonds directly from the Treasury, in the "primary" market. This is called "monetizing the debt", and it's highly inflationary. Which is why the Fed must now buy only in the secondary market.
18 posted on 12/29/2001 12:18:13 AM PST by Pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
What happened to the FED sinking everything?

They did their damndest. Please note that Kudlow makes the point that LAST year, the monetary base SHRANK by 3%--why do you think the slowdown occurred, accompanied by deflation?? Wanniski and Kudlow are in agreement about a couple of things--and that is one of them. I don't think Wanniski is quite so optimistic about 2002, however..

19 posted on 12/29/2001 12:18:15 AM PST by ninenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Not really ... Link 1, Link 2

Looks like I was right. Check the dates. I was selling all year and covered in September. If I were a broker, i would not want an ahole like you for a client -- especially people who can't read.

BTW, this is my latest

20 posted on 12/30/2001 11:44:53 PM PST by spoosman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson