Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rhetorical Questions to myself and other Catholic Apologists here

Posted on 11/26/2001 2:49:05 AM PST by Brian Kopp DPM

Rhetorical Questions to myself and other Catholic Apologists here:

After reading numerous threads of what I term the "Freeper Wars," I'm going to state an assumption (which might well be terribly wrong) then ask a few rhetorical questions.

If a "Freeper Wars" thread (you know the type, starts out as a thread of interest to Catholic freepers, then turns into the standard anti-Catholic posts with attempts to defend the faith by the regular Catholic Apologists here) is several days old and several hundred posts long, the "undecided" will be few.

Your apologetics are not intended to convert those whose hearts and minds are closed (although, by the Grace of God it does indeed happen). They are intended to illuminate the intellect and soul of those still open to Truth, and still willing to learn. I doubt that many of those make it to that point in threads here, i.e., when threads are 200 to 300 posts or longer, several days old, etc.

Therefore, your time is being spent only on those you are directly responding to, when they do their own self search.

Is that an effective use of your time and talent? Or would prayer, not words, be more effective at this point? Are we trying to win souls, or points of debate?

Just a few thoughts I ask myself constantly on these types of threads, i.e., where is my time better spent, reading to my kids and spending time with my spouse, or trying to convert those late on a thread whose minds and hearts are hardened? Are there enough lurkers late in a thread to make it worth the amount of time and intense effort to defend the faith that these threads usually entail late in their usual progression?


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; religion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-240 next last
To: proud2bRC
This thread smells like reverse baiting.
21 posted on 11/26/2001 4:29:53 AM PST by Wm Bach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packrat01
I believe the numbers speak for themselves. Catholicism has had only marginal growth. Evangelical Protestantism has had explosive growth worldwide!

Largest denominational families in U.S., 2001

(self-identification, ARIS)

Denomination 1990 Est.
Adult Pop.
2001 Est.
Adult Pop.
Est. % of U.S. Pop.,
2001
% Change
1990 - 2001
Catholic 46,004,000 50,873,000 24.5% +11%
Baptist 33,964,000 33,830,000 16.3% 0%
Methodist/Wesleyan 14,174,000 14,150,000 6.8% 0%
Lutheran 9,110,000 9,580,000 4.6% +5%
Presbyterian 4,985,000 5,596,000 2.7% +12%
Pentecostal/Charismatic 3,191,000 4,407,000 2.1% +38%
Episcopalian/Anglican 3,042,000 3,451,000 1.7% +13%
Judaism 3,137,000 2,831,000 1.3% -10%
Latter-day Saints/Mormon 2,487,000 2,697,000 1.3% +8%
Churches of Christ 1,769,000 2,593,000 1.2% +47%
Congregational/
United Church of Christ
599,000 1,378,000 0.7% +130%
Jehovah's Witnesses 1,381,000 1,331,000 0.6% -4%
Assemblies of God 660,000 1,106,000 0.5% +68%

http://www.adherents.com/rel_USA.html

EVANGELICAL CHRISTIANITY HAS EXPLODED in the last 30 years. From 1975 to 1995 alone,...it has increased by 410 million and thereby almost quadrupled in half a generation. The total now stands at 560 million, up from 150 million in 1975. Reliable sources say that around 94,000 people are currently becoming Christians each day. The number of Evangelicals is growing 3 times as fast as the world population The fact that an ever growing percentage of the world population are Evangelical Christians is something which can no longer be overlooked... Conservative estimates made by David Barrett (Atlanta), the leader of the Statistics working group of the Lausanne Movement and publisher of the World Christian Encyclopaedia, show that Evangelical Christians make up around 10 percent of the world population of 5.6 billion.

22 posted on 11/26/2001 4:35:23 AM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Wm Bach
Hmmm, honestly, I was hoping to have a relatively closed discussion with my fellow Catholic freepers, due to an exchange I had recently with a fellow Catholic here in regard to one of the persistent Catholic bashers on several Freeper wars threads. My fellow Catholic's advice was:

"Don't waste too much time with **********. He exists solely to suck your time away from your family."

I thought about this at length, and realized just how much time I was wasting on apologetics with those who have a hardened heart. I think this is an honest topic for debate with my fellow Catholic freepers, (and I'm not sure I even comprehend what form of baiting it is to which you refer.)

23 posted on 11/26/2001 4:41:01 AM PST by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Wm Bach
This thread smells like reverse baiting.

My thoughts exactly.

24 posted on 11/26/2001 4:43:09 AM PST by DreamWeaver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65
fallen away Catholics, unlike those of any other faith, go nowhere

Fallen or driven?

I went "nowhere" for a while, until I started reading the Bible. Nothing clicked with what I'd learned as a catholic. It's like two different religions entirely.

25 posted on 11/26/2001 4:50:40 AM PST by packrat01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: proud2bRC
Hmmm, honestly, I was hoping to have a relatively closed discussion with my fellow Catholic freepers, due to an exchange I had recently with a fellow Catholic here in regard to one of the persistent Catholic bashers on several Freeper wars threads. My fellow Catholic's advice was:

As a fellow Catholic, it is my honest opinion that by posting a "closed discussion" to lament the appearance of the occassional anti-Catholic thread on a forum which enjoys such wide dissemination, you are inviting just the opposite.

26 posted on 11/26/2001 4:51:24 AM PST by Wm Bach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Marauder
I cannot conceive of a God that isn't satisfied with a person who lives his life true to his faith.

Care to clarify? That's pretty open ended...

Wiccans can be true to their faith.

27 posted on 11/26/2001 4:53:15 AM PST by packrat01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
I believe the numbers speak for themselves

I believe that Truth is not a popularity contest, and that false gospels will indeed draw many converts in the end times, as Jesus said.

28 posted on 11/26/2001 4:56:57 AM PST by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Wm Bach
to lament the appearance of the occassional anti-Catholic thread

Please read again my original post. That was not the purpose of this thread.

29 posted on 11/26/2001 5:01:52 AM PST by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: proud2bRC
Hmm... Obviously, I should have refrained from commenting on this thread, as well.

A wise old man once told me, "If you don't want to hear the answer(s), don't ask the question."

Peace.

30 posted on 11/26/2001 5:04:56 AM PST by logos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: arthurus
That is a silly question. The Catholics almost always write calmly and with reason.
Some Protestants write thus also but many write as if they are snarling and pounding their fists upon the table. Catholics here
almost never accuse others of conspiracy and Evil. Many Protestants do just that. If one is attracted to unreasoning fanatics
then Catholic reasonableness may, indeed, drive them away.

It's not the unreasoning fanatics; it is exactly the Catholic reasonableness.

I read the Bible, it says thus and such. Catholicism "missed it by that much". Some of their traditions are opposite of what the Bible teaches; but they're their traditions, and they're gonna keep 'em.

Catholicism is a Bible based religion; kinda.

31 posted on 11/26/2001 5:12:41 AM PST by packrat01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
Doesn't address convert from/to; only growth.

After all, they breed like, um, catholics.

32 posted on 11/26/2001 5:15:12 AM PST by packrat01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: packrat01
Then by my experience only I'd say you learned or were taught badly. The Faith is in the Liturgy both of the Word and the Eucharist.
33 posted on 11/26/2001 5:22:23 AM PST by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Comment #34 Removed by Moderator

To: proud2bRC
Your apologetics are not intended to convert those whose hearts and minds are closed (although, by the Grace of God it does indeed happen). They are intended to illuminate the intellect and soul of those still open to Truth, and still willing to learn. I doubt that many of those make it to that point in threads here, i.e., when threads are 200 to 300 posts or longer, several days old, etc.

Try 9104. That's where the Neverending Story is at this time.

Therefore, your time is being spent only on those you are directly responding to, when they do their own self search.

Is that an effective use of your time and talent? Or would prayer, not words, be more effective at this point? Are we trying to win souls, or points of debate?

Probably not very effective, but it sure has helped me understand my faith even more. Of course prayer is always the first step. If we try to take on the hard of heart ourselves, we'll fail miserably. But if we rely on the Spirit to guide our thoughts and our words, there's no doubt that even the hardest heart can be softened.

Just a few thoughts I ask myself constantly on these types of threads, i.e., where is my time better spent, reading to my kids and spending time with my spouse, or trying to convert those late on a thread whose minds and hearts are hardened? Are there enough lurkers late in a thread to make it worth the amount of time and intense effort to defend the faith that these threads usually entail late in their usual progression?

My family time is just that. I don't FReep in the evenings and very rarely do I get online on the weekends. Time with your wife and kids should always come before time online. Yes, there are lurkers that can be enlightened and we should do our part to see that they do not fall for the tactics of the anti-Catholic (I'm speaking of the more rabid of them, btw). If we remained silent, the CC would be losing members at a more rapid pace that the present time and numbers would actually be decreasing instead of increasing.

35 posted on 11/26/2001 5:34:47 AM PST by al_c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wm Bach
A "closed discussion" would only be possible on a catholic website, with restricted member lists. I've read posts on threads that have nothing to do with catholicism, try to "thread bait" by injecting catholic doctrine.

Those of us who HAVE repented of our catholic religion; don't pick fights with catholics, as much as we attack their defense.

read it again. it does make sense.

36 posted on 11/26/2001 5:37:03 AM PST by packrat01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: OkieGrit2
"I will never convert but I will also never blindly bash the RCC."

Ahh, a true Christian.
I am a practicing RC, and very often find things that I don't agree with (when I'm looking).
My wife and I visit services of many other denominations, and I find things in those other churches that I really like, and also things that I don't agree with, (when I'm looking).
We have been blessed with a priest that gives the hard sermons: like the requirement to be "born-again", (refreshing from a Catholic priest), Pro-life sermons (that have people squirming in thier seats), Grace, forgiveness, sexual imorality, etc.
I've found many of my fellow Catholics to be not too scripturally sound - they are unfamiliar with the Bible.
But then there are many that are involved in Bible study - it all depends on my thinking being negative, or positive.
I've never been comfortable with a lot of the emphasis on Mary, and I believe that Mary would want ALL glory to be on Jesus - that is why the Gospels are about Jesus, and not Mary.
But then, like I stated aerlier, there are aspects of other denominations that I'm not comfortable with, either.

37 posted on 11/26/2001 5:37:06 AM PST by Psalm 73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65
Maybe we could blame it on a warped interpretation?
38 posted on 11/26/2001 5:42:05 AM PST by packrat01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: logos
"If you don't want to hear the answer(s), don't ask the question."

There are none so blind as those who will not see.

Their mind's made up, don't confuse them with facts.

39 posted on 11/26/2001 5:44:14 AM PST by packrat01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: proud2bRC
It is rare that I interject myself into patently stupid threads, that said.....

Some of you people really do need to put your bibles down for a few moments, remove the nails from your cabin doors, and go out for a walk.

40 posted on 11/26/2001 5:44:23 AM PST by dfrussell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-240 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson