Is This Gay Behavior Sick?

Too Good Reports ^ | November 21, 2001 | Henry Makow Ph.D.

[RMrattlesnake]

Sodonite sin

Genisis 18: 20. And the Lord said, Because the cry of Sodom and Gomorrah is great, and because their sin is very grievous;

Genisis 18:32. And he said, Oh let not the Lord be angry, and I will speak yet but this once: Peradventure ten shall be found there. And he said, I will not destroy it for ten's sake. 33. And the Lord went his way, as soon as he had left communing with Abraham: and Abraham returned unto his place.

Homosexuallity was not why they were evil it was proff they were evil.

[roylene]

Ok, I have heard homosexuals (wont use gay, its their word) refere to hetrosexuals as 'breeders'. Been refered to one myself at a school board meeting when I was protesting homosexual activists being allowed free range of the high school (Santa Cruz County). Personal backup.

[Fighting Irish]

Their behavior is not sick to another sodomite.

[George W. Bush]

Good one. Bookmarked.

[DouglasKC]

Which is why decent people must condemn the homosexual lifestyle. Nothing good can come from such poisonous weeds.

See John 8:1-9

[EdReform]

** "Ok, I have heard homosexuals (wont use gay, its their word) refere to hetrosexuals as 'breeders'. Been refered to one myself at a school board meeting when I was protesting homosexual activists being allowed free range of the high school (Santa Cruz County)." **

Doesn't surprise me. Did they make any other accusations?

Some information for parents:

HOW TO PROTECT YOUR CHILDREN FROM PRO-HOMOSEXUALITY PROPAGANDA IN SCHOOLS

Seven Steps to Recruit-Proof Your Child

"Activism in the Schools"

First AIDS Education, Then "Safe Schools," Then Gay Advocacy

Interview with a Parents' Rights Activist: Brian Camenker of the Parents' Rights Coalition

'Parents' No Longer Recognized By Schools - Daycare Centers Are Closely Monitored, By Tom Duggan, Massachusetts News Fistgate Archive

** "Personal backup." **

Thanks for posting this documentation.

[Clint N. Suhks]

Afraid to answer, huh? Afraid to be seen as the self-proclaimed moralist to all that will listen? Some of us are beyond you and your trite answers to complicated questions, always with the attitude that you (yes you, lucky for us to be alive when you are here to pronounce your solutions) have solved profound questions that have been debated for thousands of years.

Asked and answered, and I repeat, the answer is yes for the rest of the verbally challenged. Your foul and erroneous analogy is that it would be deviant, but what is complicated or profound about perversion, is it good or bad?

Do a self-search, buddy, and see how many times you have visited FR's "sodomy threads." What you will find will not surprise me.

Okaay… there good buddy, at least I’m not here to justify my brother’s filthy behavior, I’m here to expose the pseudo intellectuals like you who put the values of self over the good of society.

To quote a very thoughtful author: "You are never dedicated to something you have complete confidence in. No one is fanatically shouting that the sun is going to rise tomorrow. They know it's going to rise tomorrow. When people are fanatically dedicated to political or religious faiths or any other kind of dogmas or goals, it's always because these dogmas or goals are in doubt."

Listen philosophy boy, please point out my dogma, where ever did I bring religion into the argument? Your reading comprehension needs improvement. Oh and, please spare us the Zen analogies of metaphysics, they are capricious and irrelevant. Is perversion right or wrong?

Is it better for an idea (intellectualism) to destroy a society than for a society to destroy an idea? The scientific test of a vice is not that society approves or disapproves. The test should be is it rational or irrational. Is perversion rational?

I perfect description of your own fanatical obsession with this issue.

Exactly what have you perfected, or is it just that your fanaticism to justify your brother’s baseness and degradation that is peaking through the objective reality of truth?

[Syncro]

LOL

[Khepera]

because some people do not fit a steriotype does not make it OK.

[gohabsgo]

excellent article in understanding and articulating the strategies we have seen so effectively at work.

[tonycavanagh]

I think Rightwing Conspirator1 has a point, in times of war you have full employment.

We can have three Wars.

War on Terrorists (WOT)

War on Drugs (WOD).

War on Fags WOF.

Just think of all that employment, we will need people to build extra deten camps, people to man the camps, people to fight the three wars, people to supply those who fight the wars.

And we can make it self sustaining by building factories next to the camps and hiring out the prisoners to work in the factories.

Tony

[Jn316]

BikerNYC: Quoting someone else..."You are never dedicated to something you have complete confidence in. No one is fanatically shouting that the sun is going to rise tomorrow. They know it's going to rise tomorrow. When people are fanatically dedicated to political or religious faiths or any other kind of dogmas or goals, it's always because these dogmas or goals are in doubt."

Where's the thread about the sun not rising tomorrow?

*rolls eyes*

[lavaroise]

I agree, homosexuality is sinister. I believe it is Hitler's racism to the power 10 sustained by cultivated sexual arousals, not mere admiration of the Aryan man as a genetical ideology. And by the way, gay rights are based on the same Hitlerian genetical rationals and wishes for genocides of straight people, in part by looking for a gay gene in order to practice abortions to attain such goal.