Skip to comments.Is This Gay Behavior Sick?
Posted on 11/21/2001 6:50:27 AM PST by Stand Watch Listen
Imagine that an organism is sick. Imagine that the sick cells convince the organism that they were healthy, and in fact, the healthy cells are sick. The gullible organism would just get sicker and sicker.
This is the relationship between society and homosexuals today. Gays argue that same-sex behavior is no different than being left-handed. On the other hand, they say heterosexual behavior is not natural, but socially conditioned and oppressive. Heterosexual society and family are being ravaged. Our stupid, opportunistic and craven leaders have betrayed us. We don´t even know we are at war.
Let´s decide whom, in fact, is sick.
Let´s look at gay behavior as defined by two gays, Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen Ph.D., authors of After the Ball: How America will Conquer its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90´s(1989).
In Chapter Six, they outline ten categories of misbehavior, drawn from their own experiences, wide reading and thousands of hours of conversation with hundreds of other gays. Their contention is that the gay lifestyle, not gay sexuality mind you, is the pits. They want gays to improve their image by addressing what is wrong with a lot of gays. (276)
What follows are some highlights. As you read this, ask yourself if there is another human community, including the Mafia that could make these generalizations about itself. Ask yourself if we haven´t caught this disease, or at least the sniffles.
The authors say a surprisingly high percentage of pathological liars and con men are gay. This results from a natural habit of self-concealment, and leads to a stubborn self-deception about one´s own gayness and its implications.
They say gays tend to reject all forms of morality and value judgments. Gay morality boils down to If it feels good, I´ll do it! If a gay feels like seducing a trusted friend´s lover, he´ll do it, justifying it as an act of sexual freedom and the friend be damned.
They say gays suffer from a narcissistic personality disorder and they give this clinical description: pathological self absorption, a need for constant attention and admiration, lack of empathy or concern for others, quickly bored, shallow, interested in fads, seductive, overemphasis on appearance, superficially charming, promiscuous, exploitative, preoccupied with remaining youthful, relationships alternate between over idealization and devaluation.
As an example of this narcissism, the authors say a very sizable proportion of gay men who have been diagnosed HIV positive continue to have unprotected sex.
They say the majority of gays are extremely promiscuous and self-indulgent. They must continuously up the ante to achieve arousal. This begins with alcohol and drugs and includes such forbidden aspects of sex as wallowing in filth (fetishism and coprophilia) and sadomasochism, which involves violence.
They say many gays indulge in sex in public bathrooms and think it is antigay harassment when it is stopped. Many think they have a right to importune straight males, including children.
Many gays are single minded sexual predators fixated on youth and physical beauty alone. When it comes to the old or ugly, gays are the real queerbashers. Disillusioned themselves, they are cynical about love.
Relationships between gay men don´t usually last very long. They quickly tire of their partners and fall victim to temptation. The cheating ratio of married´ gay males, given enough time, approaches 100%.
Even friendships are based on the sexual test and hard to sustain. Unattractive gay men find it nearly impossible to find a friend, let alone a lover.
The authors say gays tend to deny reality in various ways: wishful thinking, paranoia, illogic, emotionalism and embracing crackpot ideas.
Is there any doubt that this behavior is sick? I feel no malice toward gays. I feel the same way about people who have the flu. I want them to get better and I don´t want it to spread.
Unfortunately, even the authors of this book are deceiving themselves. They claim that it is the gay lifestyle and NOT gay sexuality that is the pits. Who are they kidding? The two are inseparable.
The authors of this book are public relations experts who believe that our problem is fundamentally one of bad image with straights. The book details a comprehensive public-relations campaign that should go a long way towards sanitizing our very unsanitary image:
Desensitization: flooding straight America with advertising presenting gays in the least offensive manner possible.
Jamming: Advertising that equates fear of gays with hatred of Jews, Blacks and women.
Conversion: Presenting images of gays that look like regular folks. The image must be the icon of normality.
They say it makes no difference that the ads are lies because we are using them to counter negative stereotypes that are every bit as much lies.
This book was written in 1989 and obviously a campaign similar to this has taken effect. Read what the authors say about it:
By Conversion, we mean something far more profoundly threatening to the American Way of Life [than subversion] We mean conversion of the average American´s emotions, mind, and will, through a planned psychological attack, in the form of propaganda fed to the nation via the media. We mean to turn their hatred into warm regard whether they like it or not. (153)
Thus gays want Americans to learn that something they naturally and justifiably regard as sick, is in fact healthy. Thus Americans will be defenseless to resist their importunities whether in parks, barracks, bathrooms or classrooms.
It is a measure of the authors´ cynicism and self-deception that THEY quote psychologist M. Scott Peck, who in People of the Lie characterizes people who suffer from malignant narcissism simply as evil.
Evil people, Peck says, have an unshakable will to be right and will not consider the possibility that they are wrong Their main weapon, interestingly enough is the lie with which they distort reality to look good to themselves, and to confuse others. (297)
Gays can continue to fool themselves. But let us not. Some of these people are evil. Their behavior is sick. And it´s contagious.
Genisis 18: 20. And the Lord said, Because the cry of Sodom and Gomorrah is great, and because their sin is very grievous;
Genisis 18:32. And he said, Oh let not the Lord be angry, and I will speak yet but this once: Peradventure ten shall be found there. And he said, I will not destroy it for ten's sake. 33. And the Lord went his way, as soon as he had left communing with Abraham: and Abraham returned unto his place.
Homosexuallity was not why they were evil it was proff they were evil.
See John 8:1-9
Doesn't surprise me. Did they make any other accusations?
Some information for parents:
'Parents' No Longer Recognized By Schools - Daycare Centers Are Closely Monitored, By Tom Duggan, Massachusetts News Fistgate Archive
** "Personal backup." **
Thanks for posting this documentation.
Asked and answered, and I repeat, the answer is yes for the rest of the verbally challenged. Your foul and erroneous analogy is that it would be deviant, but what is complicated or profound about perversion, is it good or bad?
Do a self-search, buddy, and see how many times you have visited FR's "sodomy threads." What you will find will not surprise me.
Okaay there good buddy, at least Im not here to justify my brothers filthy behavior, Im here to expose the pseudo intellectuals like you who put the values of self over the good of society.
To quote a very thoughtful author: "You are never dedicated to something you have complete confidence in. No one is fanatically shouting that the sun is going to rise tomorrow. They know it's going to rise tomorrow. When people are fanatically dedicated to political or religious faiths or any other kind of dogmas or goals, it's always because these dogmas or goals are in doubt."
Listen philosophy boy, please point out my dogma, where ever did I bring religion into the argument? Your reading comprehension needs improvement. Oh and, please spare us the Zen analogies of metaphysics, they are capricious and irrelevant. Is perversion right or wrong?
Is it better for an idea (intellectualism) to destroy a society than for a society to destroy an idea? The scientific test of a vice is not that society approves or disapproves. The test should be is it rational or irrational. Is perversion rational?
I perfect description of your own fanatical obsession with this issue.
Exactly what have you perfected, or is it just that your fanaticism to justify your brothers baseness and degradation that is peaking through the objective reality of truth?
We can have three Wars.
War on Terrorists (WOT)
War on Drugs (WOD).
War on Fags WOF.
Just think of all that employment, we will need people to build extra deten camps, people to man the camps, people to fight the three wars, people to supply those who fight the wars.
And we can make it self sustaining by building factories next to the camps and hiring out the prisoners to work in the factories.
Where's the thread about the sun not rising tomorrow?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.