Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is This Gay Behavior Sick?
Too Good Reports ^ | November 21, 2001 | Henry Makow Ph.D.

Posted on 11/21/2001 6:50:27 AM PST by Stand Watch Listen

Imagine that an organism is sick. Imagine that the sick cells convince the organism that they were healthy, and in fact, the healthy cells are sick. The gullible organism would just get sicker and sicker.

This is the relationship between society and homosexuals today. Gays argue that same-sex behavior is no different than being left-handed. On the other hand, they say heterosexual behavior is not natural, but socially conditioned and “oppressive.” Heterosexual society and family are being ravaged. Our stupid, opportunistic and craven leaders have betrayed us. We don´t even know we are at war.

Let´s decide whom, in fact, is sick.

Let´s look at gay behavior as defined by two gays, Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen Ph.D., authors of After the Ball: How America will Conquer its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90´s(1989).

In Chapter Six, they outline “ten categories of misbehavior,” drawn from their own experiences, wide reading and thousands of hours of conversation with hundreds of other gays. Their contention is that the gay lifestyle, not gay sexuality mind you, “is the pits.” They want gays to improve their image by addressing “what is wrong with a lot of gays.” (276)

What follows are some highlights. As you read this, ask yourself if there is another human community, including the Mafia that could make these generalizations about itself. Ask yourself if we haven´t caught this disease, or at least the sniffles.

•  The authors say “a surprisingly high percentage” of pathological liars and con men are gay. This results from a natural habit of self-concealment, and leads to a stubborn self-deception about one´s own gayness and its implications.

•  They say gays tend to reject all forms of morality and value judgments. Gay morality boils down to “If it feels good, I´ll do it!” If a gay feels like seducing a trusted friend´s lover, he´ll do it, justifying it as an act of “sexual freedom” and the friend be damned.

•  They say gays suffer from a “narcissistic” personality disorder and they give this clinical description: “pathological self absorption, a need for constant attention and admiration, lack of empathy or concern for others, quickly bored, shallow, interested in fads, seductive, overemphasis on appearance, superficially charming, promiscuous, exploitative, preoccupied with remaining youthful, relationships alternate between over idealization and devaluation.”

•  As an example of this narcissism, the authors say “a very sizable proportion of gay men” who have been diagnosed HIV positive continue to have unprotected sex.

•  They say the majority of gays are extremely promiscuous and self-indulgent. They must continuously up the ante to achieve arousal. This begins with alcohol and drugs and includes such “forbidden” aspects of sex as wallowing in filth (fetishism and coprophilia) and sadomasochism, which involves violence.

•  They say many gays indulge in sex in public bathrooms and think it is antigay harassment when it is stopped. Many think they have a right to importune straight males, including children.

•  Many gays are “single minded sexual predators” fixated on youth and physical beauty alone. When it comes to the old or ugly, gays are “the real queerbashers.” Disillusioned themselves, they are cynical about love.

•  “Relationships between gay men don´t usually last very long.” They quickly tire of their partners and fall victim to temptation. The “cheating ratio of ‘married´ gay males, given enough time, approaches 100%.”

•  Even friendships are based on the sexual test and hard to sustain. Unattractive gay men find it nearly impossible to find a friend, let alone a lover.

•  The authors say gays tend to deny reality in various ways: wishful thinking, paranoia, illogic, emotionalism and embracing crackpot ideas.

Is there any doubt that this behavior is sick? I feel no malice toward gays. I feel the same way about people who have the flu. I want them to get better and I don´t want it to spread.

Unfortunately, even the authors of this book are deceiving themselves. They claim that it is the gay lifestyle and NOT gay sexuality that is “the pits.” Who are they kidding? The two are inseparable.

The authors of this book are public relations experts who believe that “our problem is fundamentally one of bad image with straights.” The book details “a comprehensive public-relations campaign that should go a long way towards sanitizing our very unsanitary image:”

“Desensitization”: flooding straight America with advertising presenting gays in the “least offensive manner possible.”

“Jamming”: Advertising that equates fear of gays with hatred of Jews, Blacks and women.

“Conversion”: Presenting images of gays that look like regular folks. “The image must be the icon of normality.”

They say “it makes no difference that the ads are lies” because “we are using them to…counter negative stereotypes that are every bit as much lies.”

This book was written in 1989 and obviously a campaign similar to this has taken effect. Read what the authors say about it:

“By Conversion, we mean something far more profoundly threatening to the American Way of Life [than subversion] …We mean conversion of the average American´s emotions, mind, and will, through a planned psychological attack, in the form of propaganda fed to the nation via the media. We mean…to turn their hatred into warm regard whether they like it or not.” (153)

Thus gays want Americans to learn that something they naturally and justifiably regard as sick, is in fact healthy. Thus Americans will be defenseless to resist their importunities whether in parks, barracks, bathrooms or classrooms.

It is a measure of the authors´ cynicism and self-deception that THEY quote psychologist M. Scott Peck, who in People of the Lie characterizes people who suffer from “malignant” narcissism simply as “evil.”

Evil people, Peck says, have “an unshakable will to be right and will not consider the possibility that they are wrong…Their main weapon, interestingly enough is the lie with which they distort reality to look good to themselves, and to confuse others.” (297)

Gays can continue to fool themselves. But let us not. Some of these people are evil. Their behavior is sick. And it´s contagious.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: dontbendover; gay; henrymakow; homosexual; homosexualagenda; lesbian; lgbt; skinheadsonfr; sodomy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 261-270 next last
Comment #141 Removed by Moderator

To: FormerLib; Blood of Tyrants
A person whose work you should look into is Dr. Charles Socarides. He has done a tremendous amount of work regarding what causes men to engage in homosexual activity: recruitment, molestation, lack of strong/any father figure, overdomineering mother, etc.

Homosexuality is like smokers, alcoholics, drug addicts, certain sexual fetishes, or other unhealthy behavior. The people who engage in these behaviors either think that what they do is perfectly normal, or they have no way to stop doing what they are doing. Because homosexual activity is so emotionally based, it requires more intensive therapy to change the behavior.

Regarding the APA, Time Magazine, back in the early 1970s, reported on the gay activists demonstrating outside of the APA's meeting, which got violent. It was through threats, not any scientific research, which got the APA to take the behavior off of its abnormal list. Look at all of the so-called studies in recent years - none of them state they show conclusively that homosexuality is genetic, and none of the favorable ones have come even close to being duplicated by other researchers. But you wouldn't know that from the media and the activists.

Without getting too much into Catholic theology regarding human sexuality, all of our body parts perform basic biological functions. The human behind is used for removing waste from our bodies. It is not built for intercourse, and is greatly harmed by those who engage in placing things there. Other body parts give pleasure as well, but, again, that's not allowed, either (Catholic theology coming into play). How anyone could say homosexual activity is anything but abnormal, I'll never know.

142 posted on 11/21/2001 12:59:02 PM PST by GreatOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: BikerNYC
When people are fanatically dedicated to political or religious faiths or any other kind of dogmas or goals, it's always because these dogmas or goals are in doubt."

From your post I have no idea what side of this issue you are taking, but this statement is wisdom.

143 posted on 11/21/2001 1:04:02 PM PST by TightSqueeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib; GW in Ohio
Actually, I believe the injunctions against eating shellfish, the injunction to make animal sacrifices to God, and whatever injunctions there are against homosexuality are all found in the Old Testament.
Yes, those are all aspects of the Lord's Covenant with the Jews.

Some are and some aren't. Some of Gods commands existed before they were given to Jews.

So are we saying those are all antiquated now?

No, but as those of us who know the Bible can tell you, the only aspects of the Judaic law that are binding on the Christian are those involving sexual morality.

Technically, no aspects of Judaic law apply. Realistically, when one knows God through Christ he will find it difficult to violate the 10 commandments as laid out in the old testament and further amplified and expanded by Jesus in the new testament.

As I said above, there were other laws and commandments that existed before the Jews and were practiced by the early church.

By the way, what exactly does the Bible say about homosexuality?

It calls it an abomination.

Homosexual sex is a sin. But so is heterosexual sex outside of marriage. And so is lusting after other woman (or men) when you're married. The point being that everyone sins. It's part of human nature to sin. All sin is the same in Gods eye. Any sin makes us unworthy of God.

If you two really want to discuss belief, go to this thread:

The NeverEnding Story (The New Christian Chronicles)

I guarantee you'll find people to agree and disagree with.

144 posted on 11/21/2001 1:08:38 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: William Terrell
To think otherwise, socially, is equivilent to, individually, deciding you can fly and jumping off a cliff. The fall is the epitome of freedom itself, until the bottom arrives.

The problem in-a-nutshell is... In this life even if you don't try to fly, the bottom arrives anyway. Nobody escapes the bottom.

145 posted on 11/21/2001 1:09:06 PM PST by TightSqueeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: GW in Ohio
Oh contraire! The psychiatric assosication took a poll of members in the early 70’s to determine if homosexuality was in fact a mental disorder. Only 10% of the members replied with only 55% agreeing that it was not a perversion – vawla! It was announced that the American psychiatric association no longer considered homosexuality a mental disease. So there you have it, less than six percent of psychiatrist thought that homosexuality was a perversion, the rest just went along with the decree. As far as I am concerned homosexuals have NO credibility as long as they accept the NAMBLA organization as just another life style. Even though they decry molestation.
146 posted on 11/21/2001 1:09:06 PM PST by roylene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TightSqueeze
Nobody escapes the bottom.

But few want it to come so quickly and so messy.

147 posted on 11/21/2001 1:11:35 PM PST by William Terrell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
Homosexual sex is a sin. ... Any sin makes us unworthy of God.

Which is why decent people must condemn the homosexual lifestyle. Nothing good can come from such poisonous weeds.

148 posted on 11/21/2001 1:18:50 PM PST by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: eaglewatch
If your studied the Bible, you would understand that the "Sodomite sin" had nothing to do with homosexuals.

Oh no, are you one of those guys that actually bought into the idea that God destroyed Sodom because they were inhospitable! LOL!

149 posted on 11/21/2001 1:20:12 PM PST by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: GW in Ohio
Pardon me if I step on any of your toes, but I think any religion that condemns homosexuality as "an abomination" is a pretty crappy religion, and you can have it.

Pardon me if I find your touching and clearly deep concern for homosexuals absurd, as they push the homosexual agenda into the public schools and continue to attack the Boy Scouts, among other outrages from this tiny group of perverts.

Your angry anti-Christianity speaks for itself.

Christians consider the bible the Word of God and the naming of homosexual behavior as an abomination was from God, not man. Your casual, sneering rejection of that fact is offensive and no, for that you are not 'pardoned'.

150 posted on 11/21/2001 1:50:00 PM PST by Jim Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib
Ref #149: I don't "buy into" anything in the "bible!" I go back to the original sources from which the, small, wandering, war-loving tribe of Jews borrowed. Again, the "Sodomite sin" was not about homosexuals.
151 posted on 11/21/2001 1:51:42 PM PST by eaglewatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: GW in Ohio
Just about every reputable psychologist in the world disagrees with the assumption that homosexuality is a perversion

Just about every reputable psychologist in the world used to agree with the assumption that homosexuality was a perversion. Then along came "political correctness"
152 posted on 11/21/2001 1:54:43 PM PST by GussiedUp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ideablitz
Another pillow biter lover...

Humans are on the top of the mammal chain. A male and a female produce a young human.

Homosexuals produce nothing. Homosexuals are a waste of human life--waste of a mammal. Period.

You want to talk about feelings?...well I'm sure as hell glad you were not around when the fight began to put us normal mammals on top...otherwise we could just as well be sex slaves for horses, dolphins etc...

Your kind is not normal.

SR

153 posted on 11/21/2001 2:12:35 PM PST by sit-rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Romulus
Rubbish. You're proposing a definition so broad and slack that, at bottom, all it really means is "important, only in a deeply meaningful way that I nevertheless find impossible to express".

No, I'm looking at the experience of the sacred and describing it. Tell me this...what is it that you feel when you experience the sacred? Internalize it and describe it. Isn't it true that we definately feel a certain way when something is presented to us that we think is sacred? What is that feeling? That's what I'm trying to get at.

And I think this started when you said something can be sacred and fun at the same time. I'm still waiting to hear how you experience something as sacred and fun at the same time. What are your emotions like when that happens?

I agree that sex can be sacred. But not because someone else defines it that way. Rather, it is sacred because you experience it as sacred. A particular sexual experience can be so overwhelmingly, beautiful, wonderful, and breathtaking, that it compares to being sacred. But when that mystical, wonderful and transcendent experience happens, I don't think you are experiencing "fun" at the same time. "Fun" is just too trivial an experience to co-exist with the sacred.
154 posted on 11/21/2001 2:49:22 PM PST by BikerNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: BikerNYC
"Fun" is just too trivial an experience to co-exist with the sacred.

Jesus never had fun?
155 posted on 11/21/2001 2:52:52 PM PST by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib
I believe this piece of anti-Christian doggerel can be tossed on the heap with all the rest.

Who said anything about being anti-Christian. It's anti-dogma and pro-freedom. It's pro-freedom because it seeks to cast off that which others seek to define you by, and to allow you to come to grips with life on your own terms.

It's a constant questioning of self-described authority.
156 posted on 11/21/2001 2:54:18 PM PST by BikerNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: eaglewatch
I go back to the original sources from which the, small, wandering, war-loving tribe of Jews borrowed. Again, the "Sodomite sin" was not about homosexuals.

Ah, one of those anti-Judeo-Christian bigots! Sorry, I didn't realize I was wasting my time.

157 posted on 11/21/2001 2:55:00 PM PST by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
On the other hand, they say heterosexual behavior is not natural, but socially conditioned and 'oppressive.'"

I'm not aware that homosexuals say this about heterosexual behavior among heterosexuals. Anyone got anything to back this up?

158 posted on 11/21/2001 2:59:41 PM PST by MissMillie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #159 Removed by Moderator

To: GW in Ohio
too much Oprah for you.
160 posted on 11/21/2001 3:06:15 PM PST by troublesome creek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 261-270 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson