[milestogo]

bttt

[Silly]

* Old Style Bump.

[deport]

Bump back to the top.......

Question: Is there a location where you can get the # of views to a post/thread? I had one but it doesn't work now..... http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/top?p=2001-10-26http://link/url/here

[ppaul]

Don't mean to sound like a "stick-in-the-mud," but why are you doing this change?

[Interesting Times]

If I understand you correctly, it will no longer be possible to 'bring back' old, interesting threads by bumping them, or to add new info to an old discussion.

This represents a fairly major loss of functionality for the forum. Is there any way it might be avoided?

[OwenKellogg]

Is there any chance of re-activating the old threads (from 2000 and earlier) which seem to have disappeared?

[scottiewottie]

Is there any way to make an exception for those threads that still have a lot of activity? Such as the "Christian Chronicles" or "Am I logged on?"?

[SolitaryMan]

Speaking of "Old Style", anyone have any Style Sheets they want to share?

[McGruff]

Let's Roll! and thanks for all you do!

[Zviadist]

YIKES!!!!!! NO more "old style"??? It can't be true! I hate new style; I hated New Coke; I hate "new and improved". Do we have to have New Coke at FR?

Oh well, I am a reactionary. What can you expect.

[RonDog]

With the "New Style" format, will there be any way to see a FULL LIST of all the screen names in a MEGA-"ping list" - beyond the first 97 characters - as there was with the "Old Style?"

[Willie Green]

I can live with the changes, but I do have a couple questions:

• Does this mean that the search engine and the archive search will be restored?

• Is it possible to have some kind of an "articles only" self-search?

Thanks.

[Ron C.]

I don't like the new style - but, I guess we're stuck with it whether we do or don't. I'd prefer the ability to access the old style in settings, for any number of good reasons... but it seems that personal preferences is not the agenda.