Skip to comments.CIA Given Unprecendented Domestic Law Enforcement Access by New Anti-Terror Law
Posted on 11/04/2001 11:19:57 PM PST by OKCSubmariner
Known as the U.S.A. Patriot Act, the law empowers the government to shift the primary mission of the FBI from solving crimes to gathering domestic intelligence. In addition, the Treasury Department has been charged with building a financial intelligence-gathering system whose data can be accessed by the CIA
Most significantly, the CIA will have the authority for the first time to influence FBI surveillance operations inside the United States and to obtain evidence gathered by federal grand juries and criminal wiretaps.
Here's a sincere question fer the LegalBeagles out there..."What is to prevent a Locality or a State from bringing charges against these LOWLIFE TRAITORS that the Federal Justice System seems soooo inept at nailing to the wall fer their Anti-American Crimes?!"
To my knowledge, there is nothing that gives the Feds Supreme--and Sole--Jurisdiction over these crimes that can be traced to specific localities!!
A state could bring charges against these lowlifes if there is a state statute violation. Then it belongs in state court. But since this has federal criminal elements under the federal campaign commission, it is proper to bring this in the federal tribunals. The only reason why the federal justice system seems so inept at nailing these lowlifes for their criminal activity is simply because the law clerks assigned the case to a Clinton judge. It is my suspicion that this law clerk or deputy clerk was "placed" in charge to disperse of such a case resulting in it being "killed" by a Clinton source. This is called "spiking a case". In cases like this, law clerks and deputy clerks may be recused if it is discovered and proven of such criminal acts.
"To my knowledge, there is nothing that gives the Feds Supreme--and Sole--Jurisdiction over these crimes that can be traced to specific localities!!"
True because the Supreme Court of the U.S. has original jurisdiction pertaining to the constitutionality of issues. Depending on if the decision of the federal court's is final or interlocutory (temportary). However, it depends on the case whether it is one of case or controversy. Of "case" means that constitional issues apply whereas, "controversy" applies to federal statutory laws. Where the federal court may have certain powers and restraints on deciding a case, the Supreme Court holds discretion on whether to hear a matter of "public interest" and that of a private dispute. Also the issue of "standing" of the plaintiff (U.S.) depends on the nature of the injury. Whether the injury is one of a diffuse nature (alleged harm) or one of cognizable nature(injury in fact) is another consideration.
and hunt, and they'll see so much sickening evidence of treason that they will be converted into "clinton haters" on the spot.
Or, perhaps if they are lazy, used to getting pre-digested news bites from useful dupes like they do from the TV, they could look here:
and find so many names, places and events tied to X(i)-42 and his enablers that their heads will start spinning.... or they can look here:
... and ask, "Just how much blood is on clinton's hands?"
My favorite source fer MUD on the Klintoons!! Thanks, Alamo-Girl!!
btw; don'tcha think ChaseR would apprecite the fine work you've done compiling all this material? Hmmmm? ;^)
It is no wonder that no decent president really gets into office. Only the corrupt ones get in for the reason that they may be blackmailed. Only those who can be blackmailed can be controlled more easier than one who is clean.
I agree with you 100%
If they could just find a way to violate would-be terrorists rights and not mine...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.