Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Neverending Story (The New Christian Chronicles)
Southern Baptists ending talks with Catholic Church ^ | 3/24/01 | AP

Posted on 10/15/2001 6:54:40 AM PDT by malakhi

The Neverending Story
An ongoing debate on Scripture, Tradition, History and Interpretation.


Statesmen may plan and speculate for liberty, but it is religion and morality alone which can establish the principles upon which freedom can securely stand. The only foundation of a free constitution is pure virtue. - John Adams


Thread 162
TNS Archives


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: christianlist; michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 3,201-3,2203,221-3,2403,241-3,260 ... 37,681-37,689 next last
To: SoothingDave
You are delusional. I don't gamble with that type.

Do you think it's about time for you to put this one in the can?

I am still waiting for a list of Infallible Pronouncements published by the RCC. That seems a simple enough request. If none is available do you wonder why?
3,221 posted on 10/26/2001 5:45:08 PM PDT by OLD REGGIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3189 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
And your beliefs are the cause of it. I notice nobody took up the issue of how we know we are being truly led by the Holy Spirit. You can't admit that your entire religious outlook rests on the hope that you aren't being led by a demon.

Good question. Look in the mirror.
3,222 posted on 10/26/2001 5:48:11 PM PDT by OLD REGGIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3192 | View Replies]

To: saradippity
I am also not clear on what a reward is,I always kind of thought that because I have faith,keep the commandments and practice the beatitudes I would be rewarded with heaven. Can you untangle this for me? I also am convinced that Jesus is my only way to the Father,that He is the Way and the Truth and the Life.

This sounds pretty good to me. I don't think there is only one way and your way is fine.
3,223 posted on 10/26/2001 5:58:48 PM PDT by OLD REGGIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3206 | View Replies]

To: Titanites
You know very well the diffefence between a SHOUT and a simple request.

Oh no. Some competition for the consolation prize.
------------------------------------------------------------

I ment evry werd I sed.
3,224 posted on 10/26/2001 6:09:03 PM PDT by OLD REGGIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3209 | View Replies]

To: JHavard
32807
Of course God knows who will be with Him and who will not . He is GOD .
As for men, well, we will find out when we get there, IMVHO .
3,225 posted on 10/26/2001 6:44:24 PM PDT by dadwags
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2807 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
What does this mean to you?

Purgatory

I. CATHOLIC DOCTRINE

Purgatory (Lat., "purgare", to make clean, to purify) in accordance with Catholic teaching is a place or condition of temporal punishment for those who, departing this life in God's grace, are, not entirely free from venial faults, or have not fully paid the satisfaction due to their transgressions.
.. . . . . . ........... ..............

Temporal Punishment

That temporal punishment is due to sin, even after the sin itself has been pardoned by God, is clearly the teaching of Scripture.
.. . . .. ................ ......

Purgatorial Fire

At the Council of Florence, Bessarion argued against the existence of real purgatorial fire, and the Greeks were assured that the Roman Church had never issued any dogmatic decree on tlils subject. In the West the belief in the existence of real fire is common. Augustine in Ps. 37 n. 3, speaks of the pain which purgatorial fire causes as more severe than anything a man can suffer in this life, "gravior erit ignis quam quidquid potest homo pati in hac vita" (P. L., col. 397). Gregory the Great speaks of those who after this life "will expiate their faults by purgatorial flames," and he adds "'that the pain be more intolerable than any one can suffer in this life" (Ps. 3 poenit., n. 1). Following in the footsteps of Gregory, St. Thomas teaches (IV, dist. xxi, q. i, a.1) that besides the separation of the soul from the sight of God, there is the other punishment from fire. "Una poena damni, in quantum scilicet retardantur a divina visione; alia sensus secundum quod ab igne punientur", and St. Bonaventure not only agrees with St. Thomas but adds (IV, dist. xx, p.1, a.1, q. ii) that this punishment by fire is more severe than any punishment which comes to men in this life; "Gravior est omni temporali poena. quam modo sustinet anima carni conjuncta". How this fire affects the souls of the departed the Doctors do not know, and in such matters it is well to heed the warning of the Council of Trent when it commands the bishops "to exclude from their preaching difficult and subtle questions which tend not to edification', and from the discussion of which there is no increase either in piety or devotion" (Sess. XXV, "De Purgatorio").
(Catholic Encyclopedia)
------------------------------------------------------------

I am particularly interested in the FIRE and in what I, in my ignorance, read as a not so subtle suggestion to "lets just keep quiet about this".

Enlightenment please.
3,226 posted on 10/26/2001 7:09:54 PM PDT by OLD REGGIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3192 | View Replies]

Just finished watching Hannity and Colmes and was having some thoughts about "hate"

I'm writing this after watching the show of Oct 26. In which they had, as a guest, a Teacher accused of teaching hatred to her students in the form of a large egg-splattered picture of Ben Ladan. I'm glad Hannity responded to the accusations lobbed against her by donating money to help pay for the picture. However I think he missed an important point that could have been made in her(the teachers) defense. Hate in and of itself isn't evil despite what some say. It is philosophically impossible, in this world, to love something without hating it's opposite. Wether or not their guest was teaching hate isn't the problem. We all must hate evil, indeed, she should be reworded if she was in fact teaching hatred of evil. One cannot love freedom if you don't hate slavery. One cannot love God without hating Sin. One cannot love good without hating evil. And, one cannot hate hate without being a hypocrite.

Hate is just an emotion. And, emotions can't be evil in and of themselves. Only applied to the wrong things are they evil. I could love slavery but, that would be evil. I can hate it and that is good.

Now I know this is bleedinglly obvious to most Catholics I know. But I was wondering what the Proddy understanding of hate is? And do any of you agree with me philosophically?

3,227 posted on 10/26/2001 7:15:08 PM PDT by Pelayo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3225 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave; Havoc
#2976
Hey, fellas, that guy Willhelm's book had its imprimatur yanked . That is definitely NOT the book to consult to learn authentic Catholic teaching .
3,228 posted on 10/26/2001 7:57:44 PM PDT by dadwags
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2976 | View Replies]

To: dadwags
Hey, fellas, that guy Willhelm's book had its imprimatur yanked . That is definitely NOT the book to consult to learn authentic Catholic teaching .

LOL - fell out of favor did he? LOL. Documentation and relevance? His statements are pretty well in line with what SD was arguing. So, Is SD now not sanctioned? Sorry - too stinking funny for me.. rofl. BTW. We here have already been entreated to the standard party line that a Stamp from the RCC on any book is meaningless - ya'll were quite thorough early one in shooting down the validity of even your own writings. Seems the standard catholic strategy is that if the ship is in a heavy storm, the best plan of action is to blow a hole in the keel and swim for it LOL. Can you tell us if there are any truly valid statements that can be relied upon? I know out of millions of books printed you all keep to The Catechism and one other source quoted here. Does that mean that the rest is propaganda and worthless garbage not to be trusted - like the 'church fathers'? I mean, it truly strikes me funny that nothing under the sun from Catholicism is trustworthy so long as it can be quoted from. rofl.

Sorry, just had to ask.

3,229 posted on 10/26/2001 8:27:58 PM PDT by Havoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3228 | View Replies]

To: Pelayo
Hate is just an emotion. And, emotions can't be evil in and of themselves. Only applied to the wrong things are they evil. I could love slavery but, that would be evil. I can hate it and that is good.

I don't want to read anything into what you are saying beyond the most blatently obvious. I think what would be useful is a definition of what hate is and is not. Hate is extreme loathing and disgust and is typically aimed at both the animate and inanimate. One can Love Camaros and hate the color red - leaving them jaundiced on a red camaro. It isn't wrong to hate evil so long as the definition of evil is a correct one. People can do evil things. One must always seek to see the root of the problem - which is Satan and the Sin nature. Thus, love your brother; but, hate his sin. More people have trouble with distinguishing between the two than actually understand what hate is. Liberalism and agenda pushers define hate as anything that is anti-them. Generally, that's called delusion.

As a matter of philosophy, you'd do well to ignore the philosophy and pay attention to what the Bible has to say about it. Hate is the same as murder because the spirit of hatred is the spirit of death. And hatred aimed at a person always results in violence - either spiritual or physical - toward a person. If you entertain the spirit of death through loathe feelings against another person, the Devil has the right to use that ungodliness to wage spiritual warfare on the person that hatred is aimed at. Thusly, whether you are guilty of punching a person due to hatred or not, you are still guilty of attempting or accomplishing harm against them due to your disobedience and complicity. This is a spiritual truth. Those of us who know how to protect ourselves agains the wiles of the Devil are immune to his attacks. Those who do not know can be severely damaged or killed by such spiritual attacks. As a side note: Witches and Satanists don't go astral just for the fun of it. They can do real damage if you aren't right with God.

These sorts of things are why the apostles said they would not have us ignorant about spiritual things. People need to wake up.

3,230 posted on 10/26/2001 8:49:46 PM PDT by Havoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3227 | View Replies]

To: Havoc
Before you deny the latter, you'd do well to read some Catholic literature in which numerous Catholics throughout time, including the likes of Cyril, are quoted as saying they'd rather spend time in Hell than in purgatory.

Is any of this you quoted saying what you said, that some Catholics wished to be in hell rather than go to Purgatory? No. When will you stop lying?

Perhaps I need to start attaching a label [metaphor in use]? I've no need to lie to defend scripture.

Your back-tracking is ineffective.

3,231 posted on 10/26/2001 9:17:34 PM PDT by Titanites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3208 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
Before you deny the latter, you'd do well to read some Catholic literature in which numerous Catholics throughout time, including the likes of Cyril, are quoted as saying they'd rather spend time in Hell than in purgatory.

Dave, I've been pointed to the error, and I missed this in the writing. The intent was metaphor at the time of the writing; but, in haste that is not the way it was constructed. So, I'll withdraw my objection to your critique of the style and readress your attention to the content as intended. Sorry for this. If I'd caught it I would have corrected it then; but, it is seen late, so I offer apology - I had no intention of deciet. But, again, I'm normally firing off replies between my duties when I have a spare moment. Most of them get assembled at a rate of a sentence or two every 10 minutes. Not an excuse, merely providing a little insight.

Now that I've eaten my words on my own use of words. Would you care for some Katsup to go with your unbiblical doctrine, or do you wish to further wallow in the contradictions it poses by way of further futile defense. Admitting you're clergy missed the boat is the first step. After that, large amounts of Coffee and cigarettes go with the sessions (CA) LOL.

3,232 posted on 10/26/2001 9:40:15 PM PDT by Havoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3231 | View Replies]

To: Titanites
When you can type everything you mean when under constant distraction, I'll take that from you. Till then, I'll just accept it as the usual cheap shot from you and move on.
3,233 posted on 10/26/2001 9:42:54 PM PDT by Havoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3231 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE
The interesting thing to me is how each of the citations seems to be restating the same thing almost verbatim.. as though it were hastily written and as usual showing no real depth. Catholic Philosophy seems always to Grow and be fleshed out in the latter time rather than being a fully developed doctrine which has been followed from the start. Why is it that clarity and detail seems to creep in over time and is usually always pointing backward to documents that cannot be verified for veracity and exist only in Catholic circles.. The great inigma... It's bad enough that it's unbiblical, but, they want to buy credibility based on popularity or usage by some early person or persons . Or through quotation of Catholics. Is this not like having hitler say, "Aryans are the master race" and then for support seeing him turn around and ask an aryan for a supporting statement. LOL. Strong argument.
3,234 posted on 10/26/2001 9:58:47 PM PDT by Havoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3226 | View Replies]

To: Havoc
As a matter of philosophy, you'd do well to ignore the philosophy and pay attention to what the Bible has to say about it. Hate is the same as murder because the spirit of hatred is the spirit of death. And hatred aimed at a person always results in violence - either spiritual or physical

You are describing an application of hatred, not hate itself. As I said before hate is only wrong if applied to the wrong thing ie God, people, the world. So too, Love isn't always good if applied to something evil.

As for the Bible it tells me I have to hate my mom, dad, wife, children, my brothers and sisters, and my own life(Luke 14:26) But it also says if I hate my brother I am a murderer suggesting the definition of hate changes in context. In Psalm 5 it is said God hatest all the wicked. Assuming we don't get a clear definition of what hate is in the Bible, how are we to find one? Philosophy?

3,235 posted on 10/26/2001 10:17:39 PM PDT by Pelayo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3230 | View Replies]

To: Havoc
Till then, I'll just accept it as the usual cheap shot from you and move on.

It wasn't a cheap shot.

There are lots of false claims made against Catholics and the Catholic Church on this thread, and people get the wrong ideas from them. You had a couple of opportunities to clarify what you meant after SD's #3141. In any case, you have now corrected your mis-statement and I thank you for that.

3,236 posted on 10/26/2001 10:21:58 PM PDT by Titanites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3233 | View Replies]

To: Havoc
Catholic Philosophy seems always to Grow and be fleshed out in the latter time rather than being a fully developed doctrine which has been followed from the start. Why is it that clarity and detail seems to creep in over time and is usually always pointing backward to documents that cannot be verified for veracity and exist only in Catholic circles..

I have often thought what a great tool this thread is for the Catholics to develop their doctrine and clean it up for later use, what other forum gives them every possible argument against their beliefs, but still is known by such a small hand full of people.

Can you see their monks pouring over these threads saying, Hey, here is an angle I never thought of, or that was a good argument so and so made on that point, or let's feed this in to them and see how it flies. (^g^) JH

3,237 posted on 10/26/2001 10:25:35 PM PDT by JHavard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3234 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE
Temporal Punishment: That temporal punishment is due to sin, even after the sin itself has been pardoned by God, is clearly the teaching of Scripture.

Hi, Reggie. The CE gave no references to support this statement?

3,238 posted on 10/26/2001 10:45:21 PM PDT by hopefulpilgrim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3226 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave; Havoc
Hi, SDave. About Havoc, you wrote: Then he says that Purgatory is a "work" of the person in Purgatory. I again ask for proof of what he claims is Catholic teaching...

I understand what he means...at least I think I do. He can correct me if I'm wrong. When he calls purgatory a "work," he means as opposed to *grace*. The "purity" which is supposed to result from purgatory is NOT a gift of God (grace), but is something the person achieves by suffering. It is a work as opposed to being something that God simply *gives* you.

3,239 posted on 10/26/2001 11:25:26 PM PDT by hopefulpilgrim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2959 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave; ksen
I wrote: I can't believe we are even talking about such a concept as "purgatory." My "purgatory" took place at Calvary when Jesus suffered and died in my place. This is not a license to sin.....no, just the opposite...Calvary gives the followers of Christ the motivation to live for Him. 2 Cor. 5:14,15:

You wrote: Your "purgatory" took place on Calvary? I fear you don't know what purgatory is. Answer me this: are you now perfect, without any sin, desire to sin, selfishness, anything unholy?

Of course I am not sinless. As long as I live in this body of flesh, it will "set its desire against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh" (Gal. 5:17).

And I know what "purgatory" is supposed to be. But it isn't real, SD. There is no such place or experience. There is heaven, and there is hell, there is no in-between. I was saying that my CLEANSING (as in purgatory) took place at the cross where Christ suffered the penalty and punishment for my sins and for my impurity. Even now, the effects of His death are still working, for the Holy Spirit says through John that "the blood of Jesus Christ His Son is cleansing us from sin." (John 1:7-9).

As ksen said, "the animal sacrifices of the OT never actually took away sin; they merely covered them until Jesus came and performed the perfect sacrifice which did not just cover sin, but actually did away with the sin." Ksen supported what he said by quoting a passage from Hebrews 10 where Christ says to the Father, "Behold, I have come to do Thy will, O God." Then in v. 10: "By which will we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all." And v. 12-14: "And every priest stands daily, ministering and offering the same sacrifices which can never take away sins: But this man (Jesus Christ) after He had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God...For by one offering He hath perfected forever them that are sanctified." Cogitate on this passage, Dave...mull it over and over. Let the truth sink in----there is no need for purgatory. Jesus paid it ALL.

Don't worry; you'll be perfect one day. But you won't have to suffer torment in purgatory to become so.

3,240 posted on 10/27/2001 12:05:47 AM PDT by hopefulpilgrim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2962 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 3,201-3,2203,221-3,2403,241-3,260 ... 37,681-37,689 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson