Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Closing of the Islamic Mind
The Daily Standard ^ | 10/11/2001 | David Brooks

Posted on 10/14/2001 11:53:36 PM PDT by Dan Day

The Closing of the Islamic Mind
A decade ago, Nobel Prize winner V.S. Naipaul knew the dangers of a backward-looking Islam.
by David Brooks
10/11/2001


David Brooks, senior editor

TWO OF THE MOST BRILLIANT EXPLANATIONS of Osama bin Laden were written 11 years ago. The first is an essay that appeared in the September 1990 issue of the Atlantic Monthly by Bernard Lewis called "The Roots of Muslim Rage." The second is a lecture delivered by V.S. Naipaul as part of the Manhattan Institute's annual Wriston Lecture series on October 30, 1990. Lewis is one of the great intellectuals of our age, but Naipaul won the Nobel Prize for literature today, so let's review his thinking.

The lecture was called "Our Universal Civilization," but it is really about time and perceptions of time. Those who believe that almost all fundamental political disputes are really arguments between theories of history will find much to their liking.

Naipaul starts by describing a young man he met in Java who wanted to become a poet. Not a lot of money in that, but Naipaul asked him, "Isn't your mother secretly proud you are a poet?" The young man replied, "She wouldn't have even a sense of what being a poet is." In her worldview, all poetry had been written. It was passed down through the ages. Having her son come up and tell her that he wanted to be a poet was akin to having him tell her he wanted to grow up and rewrite the Bible. This woman's conception of history was static, whereas her son had moved into a different culture.

When Naipaul used the phrase Universal Civilization, he was talking about that civilization that believes in the future, in progress, in the unfolding of human accomplishment. That civilization started in Europe, and once had racialist overtones, but it has spread.

It has enemies, however. Naipaul goes on to describe his journeys through non-Arab Muslim lands. What was striking about these places was that they were not originally Islamic. They had been something else. But that pre-Islamic past was everywhere denounced and erased. In the virulent form of Islam that Naipaul found in, say, Iran, the glories of Persia were being denied and abolished. In the beginning was error, apostasy, disgrace. Then came Islam and truth. End of story. "Faith abolished the past," Naipaul reported.

The style of religion he found was a complete way of life. "To possess the faith was to possess the only truth; and possession of this truth set many things on its head. To believe that the time before the coming of the faith was a time of error distorted more than an idea of history. What lay within the faith was to be judged one way; what lay outside of it was to be in another."

Naipaul was born in Trinidad to a Hindu family. At 18 he won a scholarship to Oxford, and he has lived in England since. In other words, he has many different cultures in his heritage, many histories flowing through his veins: Trinidad, India, England, the culture of the global intellectual class.

But the Islamicists he met in his travels repressed all their histories but one. The Taliban recently destroyed a 1,500 year old Buddhist shrine, but the Islamic radicals commit the same sort of vandalism within themselves. They destroy all their inheritances but Islamic fundamentalism.

And when they face a world in which they confront the pluralism of histories, they grow disoriented. Naipaul calls it "philosophical hysteria."

During his trip though Iran, Naipaul met a newspaper editor who had been at the center of the 1979 revolution. Seven months later his son was trying to get a visa to study in the United States, but the hostage crisis was underway and he couldn't get in. This man, who had supported the Khomeini revolution, was lamenting his son's predicament. "It's his future," he said. The father in him could not quite accept that his son would live as a slave to the past.

All of this really helps us understand bin Laden. He and his followers have mutilated themselves, by destroying all but one of their cultural inheritances. They believe in only one history, and it was defined and perfected long ago. Everything since is decline. In bin Laden's crackpot version of history, everything since the decline of the Ottoman empire and its alleged greatness is an additional outrage and insult to God.

In this worldview the future is not especially important (so why not go blow yourself up in a plane?). In fact, the concept of an unknown and desirable future is something of an insult. America stands for the future. It's the land of promise. More than anywhere else, it is a country with a multiplicity of histories intertwining. It's the place where the different pasts of the world come together to bring human freedom to fruition. In Lincoln's words, it's the "last best hope of earth." The emphasis in that phrase is on "last." It's hard to imagine a time when America settles back into the realm of unimportant middle rank nations, because America is about chasing the future fastest, whatever that future is. That's what the phrase, "the pursuit of happiness" means, a phrase Naipaul dissects in his speech.

So America's conception of history is the antithesis of bin Laden's. He recognizes an enemy when he sees one.

David Brooks is a senior editor at The Weekly Standard.



TOPICS: Editorial; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: clashofcivilizatio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: FITZ
Or like bin Laden trade young daughters with his buddy.

I had not heard this.

I am not saying I don't believe you. I do. Every word. I just haven't heard it.

41 posted on 10/15/2001 8:36:05 AM PDT by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Dan Day
When Naipaul used the phrase Universal Civilization, he was talking about that civilization that believes in the future, in progress, in the unfolding of human accomplishment. That civilization started in Europe, and once had racialist overtones, but it has spread.

This is correct. This civilization is sweeping away all other civilizations. In 500 years the world will be vastly different, not just in terms of technology. The cultural mores of the peoples will be more similar than today.

42 posted on 10/15/2001 8:43:06 AM PDT by TKEman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
The only Islamic country to successfully master modernity separated Islam from the state and adopted wholesale Western law, customs, and even the Latin alphabet! ... Turkey ...

The Turks keep the evil djinn of Islam stuffed in its bottle through brute force. Whenever Islamicist parties get too successful at the polls, the military stage a coup. Maybe their centuries as the hub of an empire embued their military caste with traditions of professionalism. The "janissaries" (slave soldiers) had no local loyalties.

43 posted on 10/15/2001 8:56:43 AM PDT by TomSmedley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
After a period of lynchings of Westerners in the islamic countries, (Algerian style), we will head into a defacto quarantine of those regions.

After that, they can all devolve into Mogadishus and Kabuls, and will not be getting another western bailout.

44 posted on 10/15/2001 8:56:56 AM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
When a Muslim makes a statement about doing something in the future, he always seems to append "inshallah" (God willing).

"'Ishallah' makes 'manana' look like frantic haste!" (source forgotten)

45 posted on 10/15/2001 8:58:40 AM PDT by TomSmedley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
Excellant point!!!!
46 posted on 10/15/2001 8:59:57 AM PDT by CaliforniaDreamer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Dan Day
It should by now be clear that we are facing a mood and a movement far transcending the level of issues and policies and the governments that pursue them. This is no less than a clash of civilizations -- the perhaps irrational but surely historic reaction of an ancient rival against our Judeo-Christian heritage, our secular present, and the worldwide expansion of both.

It is crucially important that we on our side should not be provoked into an equally historic but also equally irrational reaction against that rival.

The above is cut from the "Roots of Muslim Rage" article, and is right on the money. We should be gracious winners.

47 posted on 10/15/2001 9:36:07 AM PDT by TKEman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Day
Since we have been attacked we must fight back. But it is surprising how quickly all the opposition to the New World Order, Globalization, and the Universal Homogeneous State have dried up, leaving an enthusiasm for progress and the Universal Civilization. Fight to defend your country and your people, but don't get dragooned by the Wall Street Journal into a war for global standardization or a world state. A lot of people who do now will regret it later. There's much to be proud of in the achievements of Western civilization, but there are also disturbing trends that ought to be resisted.

Clearly our country must fight back against those who have attacked us and defeat them, but there are a lot of people in the world who may not agree with us in everything but who just want to be left alone. I say if they don't hurt us, let them alone. There's a temptation that we can remake the world to bring about permanent peace, prosperity and freedom. History seems to indicate, though, that such crusades create more trouble than more limited actions do.

48 posted on 10/15/2001 9:40:57 AM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Day
BTTT
49 posted on 10/15/2001 10:02:00 AM PDT by SuperLuminal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #50 Removed by Moderator

To: Dan Day
Bump for the afternoon crowd.
51 posted on 10/15/2001 2:18:39 PM PDT by Dan Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cool Guy
Thanks for the heads up!
52 posted on 10/15/2001 9:10:00 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dan Day; Travis McGee
bump
53 posted on 10/15/2001 9:36:46 PM PDT by patent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patent
rebump.
54 posted on 10/15/2001 9:49:24 PM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Cool Guy
Thanks for the flag, Cool Guy! What a wonderful article. I enjoyed it very much. How are you, by the way. It is sure good to see ya again. Take care and watch the Fresno FReeps... (smile). They are wonderful, aren't they?
55 posted on 10/15/2001 11:17:50 PM PDT by spirit_free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: spirit_free
I am fine. Thank you. How are you doing? I do read the reports of the Fresno freep all the time. Ofcourse they are wonderful! We are going to have one this weekend in San Francisco. You take care and keep FReeping:)
56 posted on 10/16/2001 4:18:25 PM PDT by Cool Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: *Clash of Civilizatio
Bumping to Clash of Civilizations list.
57 posted on 11/28/2001 4:35:11 PM PST by denydenydeny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson