Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SADDAM'S FINGERPRINTS ON 1993 N.Y. BOMBINGS - Nuke Em'
The Wall Street Journal | June 28, 1993 | By Laurie Mylroie

Posted on 09/16/2001 1:33:46 AM PDT by Uncle Bill

Saddam's Fingerprints on N.Y. Bombings

The Wall Street Journal
By Laurie Mylroie
June 28, 1993

Military retaliation from Baghdad was the main administration concern following Saturday's strike on Iraq. Yet U.S. officials should start thinking seriously about the question of retaliation through terror. It is quite possible, for example, that there was a connection between Saddam and recent attempts to blow up Manhattan. It is quite possible that New York's terror is Saddam's revenge.

Speculation about the responsibility for last week's bombing plot and the earlier World Trade Center bombing has focused on Iran, Sudan, and the fundamentalist Sheik Omar Abdel-Rahman. Much energy has been spent linking the terror to Islamic fundamentalism. Yet Saddam, a secular tyrant, is also suspect.

Information already in the public domain allows us to make this case. Start with the fact that the most important person in the Trade Center bombing is an Iraqi, Ramzi Ahmad Yusuf. Known in New York as Rashid, Mr. Yusuf has 11 aliases. The U.S. press has reported that he left Iraq in early 1992, transiting Jordan to Pakistan. He entered New York in early September on Pakistan Airways. Mr. Yusuf, traveling on his Iraqi passport, passed through immigration by requesting asylum. The FBI claims the plot began in August, while Mr. Yusuf was abroad.

Ordering Chemicals

Mr. Yusuf soon became the roomate of Mohammed Salameh, the naive Palestinian who repeatedly returned to the van rental agency for his deposit. Passionate, but not bright, Mr. Salameh would appear a ready dupe to an intelligence operative. In trial documents, an Iraqi-American, Musaab Yassin, has stated that he had known Mr. Salameh two years. Mr. Yassin moved into Mr. Salameh's apartment in September 1992, and Mr. Salameh moved out. Mr. Yassin's younger brother, Abboud, lived with him. An Arab who knows Musaab Yassin, like Mr. Yusuf, came to the U.S. in the fall of 1992, seeking medical treatment.

In late November, Mr. Yusuf allegedly ordered chemicals for the bomb and Mr. Salameh rented a locker to store them. The plot was underway. In early February, Mr. Salameh notified his landlord that he and Mr. Yusuf would leave at month's end. On Feb. 26 the World Trade Center was bombed. Messrs. Salameh and Yusuf vacated their apartment two days later.

Mr. Salameh was arrested March 4. Musaab Yassin returned home that day to find the FBI searching his apartment, while Abboud had been taken for questioning. Abboud Yassin told the FBI that he taught Mr. Salameh to drive the van that carried the bomb, that he accompanied Mr. Salameh to an apartment later identified as the bomb's testing ground; and Abboud Yassin's information helped lead the FBI to the locker where the chemicals had been stored. The U.S. press reports that Abboud Yassin then returned to Iraq, as did Mr. Yusuf. The New York Times reported that Arabs who knew Mr. Salameh and the second Palestinian arrested, Nidal Ayyad, said that the two had "close ties with two Iraqis, one of whom they say was named Rashid, but both of whom have since disappeared."

This information, although sketchy, indicates Iraqi activity. If Mr. Yusuf, the key figure, had worked for Iran, Tehran would not have let him return to Iraq. Given the totalitarian nature of the Iraqi regime, even Abboud Yassin's return to Iraq is significant. An innocent man would, arguably, have chosen to stay in the U.S.- he would have a better chance of a fair hearing in a U.S. court than before an Iraqi intelligence officer. If Abboud Yassin was involved in the bombing- but was not acting under Baghdad's instruction- then it was even more imprudent for him to return to Iraq. Mr. Yusuf and Abboud Yassin could have gone to Afghanistan, where they would not have exposed themselves to the potentially fatal suspicions of Baghdad's intelligence agencies.

That two men involved came from Iraq and returned there is reason enough to consider an Iraqi role in the World Trade Center bombing. What other possible evidence is there? It has been reported that the bombing suspects received money from abroad: up to $100,000 from Germany, Iran, and "another Middle Eastern Country." That country is probably Jordan, shielded by U.S. authorities who continue protecting Amman for the sake of the "peace process." Without knowing how much money came from each country, though, it is hard to exclude Iraq. Last but not least, it is worth noting that the February bombing occurred on the second anniversary of Kuwait's liberation.

What about last week's arrests? The FBI arrested five Sudanese and three others as it broke up a second bombing plot. The conspirators' first target was the United Nations' headquarters. Other targets were added, including FBI headquarters in New York. Additionally, four assassinations were planned, including that of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak and U.N. secretary general Boutros Boutros-Ghali.

Like the Trade Center bombing, much of this operation was amateurish. The conspiracy instigator, Siddiq Ibrahim Ali, had a plan to get a car into the FBI building, but it was amateurish (he proposed shooting the guards). Professional terrorists divide their organizations into small cells, each devoted to specific tasks. These planners used a large group in which every participant was known to the others, so that the entire plot could quickly unravel once one member was caught. Yet, like the World Trade Center bombing, this was audacious. Had it suceeded, thousands could have died.

It's important to note that both the Trade Center bombing and the later plot represent something new- at least in the West. Saddam however commits that kind of carnage on a daily basis.

Two of the nations thought to be behind the second plot are not ideal suspects. Khartoum is suspected, because Sudanese played a big role in the plot. With Iran, Sudanese has been involved in a violent campaign to overthrow secular governments in North Africa, including Mr. Boutros-Ghali's own government in Cairo. But Khartoum has not sponsored terrorism against U.S. targets. That it should suddenly support potentially the most devastating anti-American attack ever makes little sense. A separate question though is whether Sudanese diplomats could be bought. This is possible, since Khartoum is broke, and months behind in paying its diplomats.

Iranian sponsorship of the plot is also unlikely. Iran has no big quarrel with the U.N.- it benefits from the U.N.'s disarmament of Iraq. The U.N. is not the obvious target for Muslim extremists. Their quarrel is with the U.S. They could have easily chosen an American target. Explaining why fundamentalists would bomb the U.N. is possible, but the explanation is strained- that they see the U.N. as a U.S. surrogate; that their violence is caused by anger at many issues involving the U.N., including Bosnia, Somalia and the Palestinians. The Trade Center suspects issued a set of demands that the U.S. stop aiding Israel and stop interfering in the internal affairs of Middle Eastern countries.

Saddam by contrast has every reason to attack the U.N. Saddam also hates Egypt's Mubarak and wants him dead, no less than he wanted George Bush dead. Baghdad Radio threatened Mr. Bush personally during the Gulf War and Mubarak as well, "Does he (Mubarak) think that the crime he committed against the people of Iraq will go unpunished?...Prepare yourself for it and shiver at the thought."

More To Come

Attention has focused on the Iranian-Sudanese relationship. But Baghdad could as easily recruit Sudanese as Tehran.

For Saddam, Iraqi sponsorship would be vengeance with a twist. Baghdad wants Washington to blame Iran for the terror striking America's shores. If it doesn't and fundamentalists are caught, that too is fine, because it promotes a hysteria about Islamic fundamentalism and Iran which, Saddam calculates, would eventually benefit Iraq. If Saddam is behind the attacks, more will surely follow.

The focus of the New York investigations should shift to the question of state sponsorship. If considerable evidence points to Saddam, then President Clinton must fulfill his Saturday pledge: "We will combat terrorism. We will deter aggression. We will protect our people."
[End of Transcript]

NOTE: The FBI and the Mad Bombers

Ramzi Yusef, architect of first World Trade Center bombing, carried plans for airliner suicide crashes

Saddam Hussein's Iraq & Osama Bin Laden linked to USS Cole bomb attack

London Report: Bin Laden May Hit NYSE - OCTOBER 5, 1999

TRADING WITH THE ENEMY

WHAT DO YOU KNOW ABOUT CHINA REALLY?

..



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 1993wtcbombing; andrewmccarthy; danielpipes; iraqalqaeda; lauriemylroie; mylroie; nro; stevenhayes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last
SOME TERRORISTS CAME TO U.S. BY WAY OF CUBA
41 posted on 09/20/2001 2:55:41 AM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill ... bttt
SOME TERRORISTS CAME TO U.S. BY WAY OF CUBA

You mean that little podunk island we couldn't touch even as we sent thousands upon thousands to their deaths in Viet Nam?

42 posted on 09/20/2001 7:21:50 AM PDT by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

WTC BOMBING: Tracing Money Trail Is Hard As Operatives Pay With Cash
"Attempts to throttle Mr. bin Laden's finances by scouring bank records and monitoring international transfers may miss their target. Mr. bin Laden's al Qaeda group, which U.S. authorities believe was responsible for last week's attacks, has in the past often moved money by hiding $100 bills in suitcases or shuffling funds through an informal and almost entirely unregulated system of remittances, not by issuing transfer orders to big banks. He and other Islamic militants have been doing this since the 1980s, when, with arms provided in part by the U.S., they fought to drive Soviet troops from Afghanistan.

Mr. bin Laden's group hasn't entirely skirted conventional channels. He or his close associates have had accounts in London, Vienna, Dubai, Malaysia, Hong Kong, the Sudanese capital of Khartoum and several other locations, according to a former financial aide. Nor does the basic infrastructure of his organization -- training camps stocked with weapons -- come cheap.

Before moving in 1996 to Afghanistan, where he is believed to be now, Mr. bin Laden ran his operation from Sudan and splashed out $430,000 to buy chunks of land, the first of many investments there, according to testimony in the African bombings trial in New York federal court. He sent the money to a bank in Khartoum. He spent a further $230,000 to buy a used American C-130 cargo carrier. (It later crashed into a sand dune.)"

43 posted on 09/20/2001 6:19:49 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

Hijacker met with Iraqi official - By Bill Gertz
44 posted on 09/20/2001 11:58:46 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

WAR ON TERROR: LINKS TO IRAQ: IS SADDAM TO BLAME?

CIA Now Focusing on Iraq Connection

Bomber met Iraqi chief of intelligence

U.S. intelligence investigating Iraqi connection

Focus on Bin Laden's Secret Swiss Accounts

FOCUS ON BIN LADEN'S SECRET SWISS ACCOUNTS

Crime/Corruption News
Source: NYPOST
Published: September 20, 2001 Author: BRIAN BLOMQUIST
Posted on 09/20/2001 23:54:02 PDT by truther

FOCUS ON BIN LADEN'S SECRET SWISS ACCOUNTS

U.S. investigators are working on getting access to secret Swiss bank accounts, as well as other shielded accounts, in their search for Osama bin Laden's terror money, sources said yesterday.

Investigators say the money search could be crucial to learning key details about bin Laden's terror network.

Investigators also are trying to determine if bin Laden made a fortune off last week's terror bombings by playing the market to profit from the selling of aircraft and insurance stocks.

Tracking the money from those transactions could help investigators identify bin Laden's accomplices, sources said.

Sources said investigators want to look at accounts held by banks in Gibraltar and the Isle of Man, along with accounts in other countries.

Experts say foreign governments will be under tremendous pressure from the United States to open up the books.


Isle of Man

.

Investing Off-shore in the Isle Of Man

Isle of Man's Banks

Index of Gibraltar Banks

Gibraltar Banks

Abbey National Treasury International Limited
PO Box 824
237 Main Street
Gibraltar

ABN AMRO NV
2-8 Main Street
Gibraltar

Banco Atlantico (Gibraltar) Limited
Eurolife Building
1 Corral Road
PO Box 561, PMB 6314
Gibraltar

Banco Central Hispano Americano S.A.
Suite 14, Abco Arcade
30/38 Main Street
Gibraltar

Barclays Bank Offshore Financial Services (Gibraltar)
Limited
PO Box 187
Regal House
3 Queensway
Gibraltar

Barclays Bank PLC
Regal House
3 Queensway
Gibraltar

BBV Privanza International (Gibraltar) Limited
260/262 Main Street
Gibraltar

Credit Agricole Indosuez
206/210 Main Street
Gibraltar

Credit Suisse (Gibraltar) Limited
PO Box 556
First Floor
Neptune House
Marina Bay
Gibraltar

Hispano Commerzbank (Gibraltar) Limited
Suite 14
Don House
30/38 Main Street
Gibraltar

Jyske Bank (Gibraltar) Limited
76 Main Street
PO Box 143
Gibraltar

Lloyds TSB Bank PLC
323 Main Street
Gibraltar

NatWest Offshore Limited
NatWest House
57 Line Wall Road
P O Box 707
Gibraltar

Newcastle Bank (Gibraltar) Limited
Hadfield House
Library Street
Gibraltar

Newcastle Building Society
Regal House
Queensway
Gibraltar

Norwich & Peterbourgh Building Society
198/200 Main Street
Gibraltar

SG Hambros Bank & Trust (Gibraltar) Limited
PO Box 375
Hambro House
32 Line Wall Road
Gibraltar

SG Hambros Bank & Trust Limited
Hambro House
Line Wall Road
PO Box 400
Gibraltar

The Gibraltar Private Bank Limited
Suite 921 Europort
P.O. Box 407
Gibraltar

The Royal Bank of Scotland (Gibraltar) Limited
1 Corral Road
Gibraltar

Turicum Private Bank Limited
Turicum House
PO Box 619
315 Main Street
Gibraltar

Banks in Gibraltar

Investing Off-shore in Gibraltar
"Non-residents are taxable on their income received in Gibraltar, but not if it is channelled through a trust or an exempt or a qualifying company. Also bank interest is exempt from tax."

Financial Action Task Force on Money-Laundering - (Gibraltar, Guernsey, the Isle of Man and Jersey)
"Gibraltar, Guernsey, the Isle of Man and Jersey have in place a system for reporting suspicious transactions. Where the underlying criminal conduct is drug trafficking or terrorism, the obligation to report is a direct one."

Soros, Rothschild, and Evil Incarnate (Marc Rich's connections)

A STORY ABOUT THE WAR IN CROATIA (Marc Rich /Eagleburger/Kissinger/Snowcroft)
"Marc Rich is wanted in the U.S. to serve decades behind the bars on indictments for tax evasion, fraud, racketeering and trading with the enemy. Marc Rich traded with Iran during the hostage crisis, and with Iraq during the Desert Storm operation. Marc Rich, also, traded with South Africa, despite of U.N. embargo. His case is one of the largest tax-evasion cases in U.S. history."

45 posted on 09/21/2001 12:59:03 AM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

A six-year struggle to uncover Osama bin Laden's financial network failed because American officials did not skillfully use the legal tools they had, did not realize they needed stronger weapons and faced resistance at home and abroad
46 posted on 09/21/2001 1:16:26 AM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

IS BAGHDAD BEHIND A SERIES OF UNEXPLAINED DISASTERS?

Saudis see their kingdom as scapegoat in terror attacks investigations

GOLD AT THE END OF A TRAIL OF BLOOD

Bin Laden's Network in Philippines Still Intact: Police

The secret FBI files on the suicide bomber who changed his mind

Terrorist hunt turns to London futures market

47 posted on 09/21/2001 2:01:27 AM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: OKCSubmariner
I've been hearing how awake and serious Americans are now. Really? Who will be in charge of America's Cipro storage. Jocelyn Elders?


48 posted on 10/25/2001 5:58:12 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

Safire: Advance the Story
"For years, U.S. officials kept mum about the duplicity of Saudi Arabia in financing anti-U.S. incitement while professing to be a U.S. ally. But because The New Yorker's Seymour Hersh, the oldest investigative reporter alive, held his ear trumpet to our ultra-secret Big Ear, we now have telephone intercepts between Prince Bandar, the Saudi ambassador to Washington, and his father, the defense minister. The Saudis never have been on our side in the war on terror — which our leaders have long known but most Americans did not.

What about a connection between Osama bin Laden and Iraq's Saddam Hussein? Because the Scowcroft set at the National Security Council is still in denial about its blunder a decade ago that permitted Saddam to stay in power, the C.I.A. professes to see no collaboration in Baghdad."

Whatever Happened to Iraqgate? Was it swept under the rug because of the CIA - - or Hillary?

The Family That Preys Together

Bush, Bahrain crown prince swap pledges of support

US 'risks making Ben Laden a hero' in Bahrain

49 posted on 10/25/2001 7:27:38 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: OKCSubmariner
Fox News Transcript
"HUME: Senator Graham, there's a whole school of thought that's developed with some strong advocates that says this has got to be Iraq, that this — that not only might Iraq have had some hand in what happened on September 11 atrocities, but that this anthrax scare has the fingerprints of Iraq.

What is your assessment as intelligence chairman of the potential role of Iraq in any of this?

GRAHAM: First, I'd like to say something about my friend and colleague, Bill Frist. As the only medical doctor in the Senate, he has played a very significant role in helping to explain, to educate and to keep down the level of anxiety of both on Capitol Hill and, through his web site, to the whole nation. And I think he deserves a great commendation for his personal service during this time.

As it relates to Iraq, yes, there's been a great deal of speculation about what has Iraq's role been both in the attacks of September 11 and subsequent events. While we are putting a great deal of intelligence effort on trying to make a determination, not only for this immediate instance but because this is not just a war against bin Laden, this is a war against global terrorism, and we know that Iraq has played a role in the past in supporting other groups of global terrorists, Iraq will continue to be in our crosshairs. But at this point we don't have the basis upon which to pull the trigger.

SNOW: You say in the crosshairs and that you don't think we have the basis to pull the trigger. You mean over anthrax or period?

GRAHAM: Period. That we — there is not yet a...

SNOW: We don't think Iraq is involved in the international terror network?

GRAHAM: Oh, yes, we think Iraq is involved in the international terror network. Whether they were involved in the acts of terrorism from September 11 forward, we don't have the kind of compelling evidence that we've had against bin Laden and the Taliban.

SNOW: A lot of people argue that in a time of war you don't need precise legal standards. If somebody's hostile to you, that ought to be enough.

GRAHAM: Well, the standard that we're really using now is the standard of what it's going to take to hold this coalition together. It's very important that we keep all of the nations, particularly the Muslim nations that are now supporting us, engaged. And one of the keys to doing that is convincing evidence that we're going after a target that clearly is the culprit.

HUME: Well, Senator, doesn't that raise the prospect, or at least the concern, that the coalition becomes the objective, not the war on terrorism?

GRAHAM: They are very closely intertwined, because a successful pursuit of this peculiar type of war, which is not going to involve sending in 100,000 ground troops or thousands of tanks, but rather a very delicate combination of economic, political, diplomatic, covert action as well as military operations in order to achieve this goal, will require the sustained cooperation of a number of nations and particularly Muslim nations."

Philadelphia Union Crowd Chants "NUKE 'EM!"

50 posted on 10/25/2001 8:56:07 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: OKCSubmariner
FRONTLINE - Trail Of A Terrorist

FRONTLINE: A Terrorist's Testimony - Ahmed Ressam

UNSEALED ALI MOHAMED CASE DOCUMENTS

IRAQ

McVeigh Cites Osama Bin Laden in Letter to Fox News

David Schippers tells Metcalf feds 'ignored' warnings of WTC attacks

Oklahoma City blast linked to bin Laden

McVeigh's Ghost - Top Pentagon Officials Say Iraq Involved in OKC Bombing

An official in the Saudi Arabian Intelligence Service reported[17] on April 19, 1995, and possibly earlier, that Iraq had hired seven Pakistani mercenaries, all veterans of the Afghanistan War, to bomb targets in the United States, one of which was the Alfred P. Murrah Building. D.E. 2191 at 3 (Exhibit "A").

WND Poll:

October 21, 2001

Were Middle Eastern terrorists behind the Oklahoma City bombing?


51 posted on 10/26/2001 12:36:06 AM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

Poll shows public wants Saddam targeted
52 posted on 10/26/2001 2:03:58 AM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
I am amazed at the work you have put into this. Thank you. Bookmarked it.
53 posted on 10/26/2001 2:15:17 AM PDT by Giddyupgo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: OKCSubmariner
THE HORROR IN OKLAHOMA: HALLMARKS OF MIDEAST TERRORISM SUGGEST THE SHAPE OF THINGS COME - April 19, 1995

IF SADDAM HUSSEIN IS BUILDING BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS, IS THE UNITED STATES THE LIKELY TARGET? - April 11, 1995
"(Washington, D.C.): A report released yesterday appears to confirm the worst: Saddam Hussein has secreted away at least 17 tons of material that can be used to breed bacteria which can, in turn, be used in biological weapons (BW). If the sheer volume of this concealed activity is any guide to the size of the Iraqi BW program, it suggests that Saddam is contemplating the murder of large numbers -- perhaps millions -- of people.

...An analysis of that bombing performed by Dr. Laurie Mylroie -- a renowned Middle East expert, best-selling author and distinguished member of the Center's Board of Advisors -- indicates that the attack on the World Trade Center may have been perpetrated by Saddam Hussein as an act of revenge for his defeat in the Gulf war. Highlights of Dr. Mylroie's findings include the following:

Sometime in June 1992, Iraqi intelligence learned of a bush-league campaign of twelve pipe-bombings being plotted by followers of the New Jersey-based Islamic radical, Sheik Omar. Saddam's operatives took over, targeting the very symbol of U.S. capitalism and urban civilization -- New York's twin-towered, skyscraping World Trade Center (WTC) -- for a far more devastating attack.

The act was planned, moreover, in such a way as to deceive the American people and their government into holding the original plotters -- and their presumed sponsors in Iran -- responsible for the bombing, not Iraq. In this way, Saddam could satisfy his culture's tradition of exacting revenge against an enemy. Better still, from his point of view, that enemy would be induced to retaliate against Iraq's most dangerous regional foe, Iran.

The bomb used in the World Trade Center was intended to employ metal additives dramatically to boost its explosive power. Had it been properly positioned and detonated according to plan, it could have toppled one of the World Trade Center's towers into the other, killing tens of thousands of people and causing incalculable damage in lower Manhattan.

The bomb also apparently was designed to vaporize cyanide gas -- which, if distributed through the tower's ventilation system, would have assured massive casualties throughout the bombed structure."

FRONTLINE - Testimony of a Terrorist - Ahmed Ressam

Q. Why don't you tell the jury about the experiments that

you conducted on dogs, you personally, and start with the experiment where you put the dogs in a box.

A. We were just present there; it was actually our chief that was there carrying out the experiment.

Q. You watched as your chief put a dog in a box, correct?

A. Yes. We were all present there.

Q. I am talking about you.

A. Yes.

Q. Your chief put cyanide in the box, is that correct?

A. Yes.

Q. He added sulphuric acid to the cyanide, correct?

A. Yes.

Q. And the dog shortly thereafter died from that experiment, correct?

A. Correct.

Q. How long in general would you say that you watched these dogs suffer?

A. Not very long.

Q. How long?

A. Not very long, I don't remember precisely, maybe four minutes, because the dog was very small.

Q. In the four minutes you watched the dog suffer before the dog died did you do anything to stop your leader from killing the dogs?

A. No.

Q. You wore a mask over your face during these experiments, correct, so that you would not breathe in any of the poison?

A. Yes.

Q. You practiced these techniques on the dogs so that later on in one of your operations you would be able to perform such techniques on human beings, is that correct?

A. Yes. We wanted to know what is the effect of the gas, yes.

Q. Some of your potential targets while you were in the camp were American citizens, is that correct?

A. In regard to targets in general, yes. Yes, we were speaking about America as an enemy of Islam. ...

Q. The reason you were trained in the use of cyanide at the camps in Afghanistan was because you were going to use cyanide in your urban warfare, correct?

A. We don't know. Possibly if I needed it, I would use it. Yes, because it is very difficult to use gases in the field.

Q. You were trained to use cyanide by placing the cyanide near the air intake of a building, correct?

A. They gave us some examples, but we did not try them out actually.

Q. The reason one of the examples was to put the cyanide right near the air intake of a building such as a government building, correct?

A. Yes, that's right.

Q. And the reason that you would put the cyanide, you were trained, near the air intake would be to kill the most amount of people without endangering yourself and without being detected, correct?

A. Yes, that's how gas is used in killing. ...

Q. Other experiments that you conducted at the Deronta camp included experiments with other poisons, correct?

A. Yes.

Q. One of the things you learned at the Deronta camp was how to mix poisons with other substances, put them together and smear them on doorknobs; do you remember that?

A. Yes, I did say that.

Q. Any person who would touch that doorknob would soon have poison running through their bloodstream, correct?

A. Yes, that's true; the poison will infiltrate his body.

Q. And kill him or her, correct?

A. Yes.
[End of Partial Transcript]

Nuke em'

54 posted on 10/26/2001 11:38:29 AM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
Thanks for all your information. Very helpful and it will be used.
55 posted on 10/26/2001 11:52:35 AM PDT by OKCSubmariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

Iraq, Czech Republic may be sources of anthrax
Note: Clinton's Sympathy For Marxist Terrorists

Building the case against Iraq

Czechs confirm Atta met with Prague-based Iraqi diplomat

Physics of anthrax is beyond al-Qaida, Sandia Labs expert says

FUTURE WIDOWS OF AMERICA: WRITE YOUR CONGRESSMAN

56 posted on 10/26/2001 11:58:32 AM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: OKCSubmariner
Thanks so much kind sir. God bless.

#11

57 posted on 10/26/2001 12:20:52 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: OKCSubmariner
Iraqi Anthrax? -- Getting Closer - October 26, 2001

Cooking the Books
"The CIA has become a government unto itself – and, as such, is a threat to our very system and to our liberties. I know this is not fashionable to say these days, but we have to face facts:

1) They did a horrible job of predicting/preventing Sept. 11.

2) They have lashed out at Congress – the members of which are elected directly by the people – and tried to limit what information is shared with the 'people's representatives.' True, some congressmen are jerks and reveal top secret information. But CIA then uses that breach to justify keeping everyone in the dark.

3) They were just given an extra $1 billion by the president for the hunt for Osama bin Laden. And yet now Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld tells USA Today that we "may never find Osama bin Laden." What, then, are we paying all that money to the CIA for?

4) Iraq: clearly the CIA – through leaks from "government intelligence sources" – is trying to ignore/dismiss Iraq's role in both Sept. 11 and the ongoing anthrax attacks. The CIA is deliberately trying to steer American public opinion away from Saddam. In other words, instead of a straight assessment of gathered facts, they are 'cooking the books' to result in a pre-ordained conclusion.

For example, the CIA very clearly leaked to Murray Weiss of the New York Post on Thursday's front page that "ultra right wing organizations have become the key focus of the massive federal investigation into the murderous anthrax attacks."

Furthermore, the CIA has carefully leaked that of the three nations that manufacture this particular form of anthrax – Russia, Iraq and the United States – the federal authorities have "ruled out Russia and Iraq as sources of this strain of anthrax."

Oh, really?

Why are they ignoring the fact that Israeli intelligence now knows that lead hijacker Mohamed Atta picked up Iraqi-produced anthrax spores in Prague when he met with Iraqi intelligence official Achmed Al'ami on June 2, 2000, in a Prague café?

And that Atta was frequently known to have tried to learn all about cropdusting planes in Florida?

And that Atta once went to a Florida pharmacy for treatment of 'damaged hands'? Perhaps a case of cutaneous anthrax from handling the master supply he brought over with him from the Iraqis?"
[End of Partial Transcript]

Czechs confirm Atta met with Prague-based Iraqi diplomat

Atta may have carried Iraq anthrax to U.S. -report

U.S. CZECHS OUT ATTA'S TRIP

FBI moves in on Atta's Caribbean connection

Iraq may have produced up to 10 billion doses of anthrax, botulinum toxin and aflatoxin

U.S. gave antrhax to Iraq to use on Iran

Iran Says U.S. Paying for Giving Anthrax to Iraq

Saudi Nuclear Ambitions May Have Involved Iraq

58 posted on 10/26/2001 2:50:47 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: OKCSubmariner
ABC Radio News Reporting That Anthrax Spore Coating Used by Iraq

Hijacker 'Given Anthrax Flask By Iraqi Agent'

Iraq 'behind US anthrax outbreaks'

Iraq builds chemical weapons system 'capable of hitting European cities'

Iraqi nerve gas 'could paralyse western cities'

Anthrax clue to heroin deaths

Secret Germ Warfare Experiments

59 posted on 10/26/2001 5:10:26 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

Terror Additive: Tests Find Laced Anthrax; Atta Met Iraqi - Full Story
60 posted on 10/26/2001 10:35:29 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson