Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Indians Trying to Save thier Reputation
NWCN King 5 | Pat McReynolds

Posted on 06/13/2004 4:27:40 AM PDT by oceanperch

Indians trying to save their reputation 10:42 PM PDT on Friday, June 11, 2004 By PAT McREYNOLDS / KING 5 News

TACOMA, Wash.
Native Americans are fighting back after federal agents raided 12 tribal smokeshops earlier this week. Shop owners didn't like their businesses being mentioned in the same sentence as Al-Qaeda.

Just as motorists cross into Tacoma on I-5, a new sign blinks in to view that says: "We are not terrorists. We are American Indians. We have been fighting terrorism since 1492." KING

"We are not terrorists. We are American Indians. We have been fighting terrorism since 1492." Patrons of the Emerald Queen Casino couldn't help but comment as they walked by. "I couldn't believe they put something like that up there," said one. "To me, it looks like an over-reaction," said another.

The owner of Lyle's Smokeshop authored the sign in response to a massive raid by customs agents earlier this week when they seized cash and thousands of cigarettes from 12 stores on the same day that the government announced a crackdown on cigarette smuggling and its ties to terrorism.

Those claims touched off a demonstration by smokeshop employees. David Turnipseed owns BJ's, another shop raided by federal agents.

"I think most people know that we're not terrorists. I think everybody knows that's a crock, that's just an excuse to get in the door," he said.

He even claims to have documents proving the cigarettes seized had already passed through customs. "It was bogus. It's a way in the backdoor to try and break the Native Americans," he continued.

Customs officials still have no comment on the raids, and even though many were put off by the message on the reader board, none of them felt their neighbors are funneling money to Al-Qaeda.

The sign is not owned by the casino and has nothing to do with it, and the message has done very little if anything to slow down Friday night business.

The raids took place on Tuesday and so far, customs agents have not charged any of the shops with a crime.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; americanindians; cigarettesmuggling; cigarettetaxes; indians; moneytrail; pufflist; smoking; taxes; terrorists; tobacco; tobaccoraid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-249 next last
To: Chad Fairbanks

I agree with that Chad. But I would like it done through the legislature, NOT by putting WA businessmen and employees out of work while special interest groups grease their politicans' pockets to get exemptions from illegal county laws. Is THAT what you mean by conservatism? I think elections and legal legislation is a better and more permanent answer than your "bite me" we've got ours, you get yours proposition. Since when have you begun supporting scheming liberal and democrat politicians as they funnel millions into rat campaign coffers? It is not a choice between your heritage and conserativism. This is a simple issue of democrat pols getting big bucks from a support group by manipulating regulations. The tribes would make $ still, even if other WA busniesses competed. Infact they would probably see greater accountability to their people. If you can get over the Indian connection for just a moment, you could see more clearly past race. Try substituting the word woman, or illegal or Mexican or any other minority, and see if you would feel the same. You would probably not support the two-tiered grab by the rats.


121 posted on 06/13/2004 9:47:18 AM PDT by Libertina (Reagan showed us what being a great president was all about. Thank you sir for bringing pride!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

LOL DennisW just jumps into the swirling black waters of a business problem that happens to have the word Indian in it. Watch out! It's hot in this frying pan;)


122 posted on 06/13/2004 9:50:42 AM PDT by Libertina (Reagan showed us what being a great president was all about. Thank you sir for bringing pride!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

WA state is a mess business wise. Over regulation and taxation. The rats have had a field day for 40 years. I agree all taxes and regs should be lowered. But by the legislature, not by the democrat politicians exempting their special interest tribal groups - thereby putting other WA people out of business, and then accepting huge campaign donations. NO, that makes for a future mess, not a solution.... IMHO.


123 posted on 06/13/2004 9:53:56 AM PDT by Libertina (Reagan showed us what being a great president was all about. Thank you sir for bringing pride!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Libertina
PHONY SOVEREIGN NATION LAND>>>>
BTW. Seminoles just opened a lavish new Hard Rock casino/hotel down here. And guess what? It was not built on traditional tribal land. The tribe acquired land right near the major highways and it's now part of the Seminole rez.

Liberals and most conservatives have a guilt complex when it comes to American Indians. This is the obvious reason no one challenges the whole notion of Indian casinos on their phony "sovereign nation" land. I feel for the original inhabitants of America but I don't believe in elevating them to billionaires and millionaires via Indian casinos. Which are basically a Democrat party plot to integrate tribal mega bucks into the Democrat party fund raising machine

124 posted on 06/13/2004 9:55:37 AM PDT by dennisw ("Allah FUBAR!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Libertina
It is about political control and money. Big shocker.

You are so right. We are being held hostage by the Chumash tribe and the politicians who benefit from their shake down.

My solution is to allow the free market to work and not give any group special privilages over another.

125 posted on 06/13/2004 9:55:45 AM PDT by Zevonismymuse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Most whites love these casinos, which are beautiful, and take no notice of anything else. Why should they? Indian welfare is a tiny portion of the total welfare dollars spent in America. Untold billions are spent on welfare programs in our own backyards, mostly on blacks and Hispanics, so why worry if the Indians in Oklahoma or wherever get a little too? At least they're providing goods and services that people really want.

If people wanted legalized gambling outside of Indian reservations it would happen, but they don't. That's not the Indian's fault.

126 posted on 06/13/2004 9:55:51 AM PDT by Batrachian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Indians didn't engineer, design and build modern day America. Whites and blacks did.

Are you really this ignorant, Dennis? I thought you were smarter than that. I really did.

Now, why don't you take that ignorant statement, and tell that to the thousands of Mohawks who travelled the country working the High Steel? Ya know, those indians who didn't build modern America, who in reality did a large portion of the work on such engineering marvels as the World Trade Center, and the thousands of other skyscrapers throughout this nation.

And that's but one example. But hey, what would I know?

127 posted on 06/13/2004 9:57:18 AM PDT by Chad Fairbanks (Welfare's purpose should be to eliminate, as far as possible, the need for its own existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk

Because you stated "good for us" and "protection agianst whites". And you stick with your ethnic identificaiton even though it's putting other WA people out of business illegally and unfairly. I don't want tribes to do badly. I am just insisting that if INDIANS can run a certain type of business, other WA residents should have the same right. Don't you agree?


128 posted on 06/13/2004 9:59:28 AM PDT by Libertina (Reagan showed us what being a great president was all about. Thank you sir for bringing pride!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Libertina

I only support the so-called "two-tiers" because I support the constitution.

As soon as you can show me where in the constitution, or in any agreement between the tribal nations and our government where it says that the county-level governments have the legal ability to regulate Indian land, then I'll stop supporting it.

Until then, I'll just continue to fight for lower taxes and less regulation for EVERYONE, regardless of race, color, creed, sex etc...


129 posted on 06/13/2004 9:59:29 AM PDT by Chad Fairbanks (Welfare's purpose should be to eliminate, as far as possible, the need for its own existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Batrachian

We have leagalized gambling across WA (unfortunately) but only tribes are allowed certain games and machines... Non-tribal need not apply....


130 posted on 06/13/2004 10:00:53 AM PDT by Libertina (Reagan showed us what being a great president was all about. Thank you sir for bringing pride!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Libertina
I am just insisting that if INDIANS can run a certain type of business, other WA residents should have the same right. Don't you agree?

I can't speak for Fish Hawk, but I agree. So, why don't you work through the state legislature and see if you can get a state law passed allowing non-indians to also have casinos? What's stopping you from pursuing that direction, Libertina? Anything?

131 posted on 06/13/2004 10:02:11 AM PDT by Chad Fairbanks (Welfare's purpose should be to eliminate, as far as possible, the need for its own existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
What I would expect to see from "conservatives" is something along the lines of "Why can't we, like the indians, have LESS taxes? Less regulation? Less harmful laws? so that WE may all prosper?"

You don't understand.  When you say 'less,' you're talking libertarian.  Conservatives are just as eager to control others through the power of government than any liberal you've ever known.  The only difference is what is being controlled.
132 posted on 06/13/2004 10:02:29 AM PDT by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Libertina

So get the law changed. It's State law that's not allowing you to do that, not Indians.


133 posted on 06/13/2004 10:02:51 AM PDT by Chad Fairbanks (Welfare's purpose should be to eliminate, as far as possible, the need for its own existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Libertina

I'm totally with you.

The reason I don't get involved with it other than on the tax/regulation/business/etc end and stay out of the fact that it involves Indians is because I have no experience .......however I have plenty of experience with the special interests greasing pols pockets when it comes to some getting things (like casinos) while others are forbidden. In the case in Delware it was the horse racing industry and the 3 existing tracks in the state.

It is the exact same situation....which is why I don't look at this particular issue as a white man vs. the Indian. It's taxation and regulation manipulation that benefits one group while hurting the little guy who is just trying to make a living.


134 posted on 06/13/2004 10:02:55 AM PDT by Gabz (RIP President Ronald W. Reagan 1911-2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Specter50
each member of the Puyallup tribe receive $2,000/month from gaming/cigarettes-$96k/year for a family of four

That is peanuts compared to the Chumash. 150 "tribe members" receive about $500,000 per year for their Las Vegas style casino. There are approximately 7500-9500 Chumash descendants, but the 150 former reservation dweller "tribal members" will not vote into the tribe the Chumash who went to school, worked hard, got jobs, and left the government housing.

And don't even mention DNA tests to determine who is actually a Chumash. The Res Squatters run the tribe.

135 posted on 06/13/2004 10:03:00 AM PDT by Zevonismymuse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: gcruse

Good point. Sad, but good point.


136 posted on 06/13/2004 10:03:22 AM PDT by Chad Fairbanks (Welfare's purpose should be to eliminate, as far as possible, the need for its own existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: oceanperch
I am not a smoker but understand a pack is now over five bucks

Under $3 here in Houston, I noticed yesterday while buying beer salt.
137 posted on 06/13/2004 10:05:07 AM PDT by Xenalyte (It's not often you see Johnny Mathis in the wild.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
Indians didn't engineer, design and build modern day America. Whites and blacks did.

Are you really this ignorant, Dennis? I thought you were smarter than that. I really did.

Now, why don't you take that ignorant statement, and tell that to the thousands of Mohawks who traveled the country working the High Steel? Ya know, those Indians who didn't build modern America, who in reality did a large portion of the work on such engineering marvels as the World Trade Center, and the thousands of other skyscrapers throughout this nation.

Mohawks made their big bucks construction money OFF RESERVATION! Yet another argument against your phony sovereign nation when it suits you for casinos scam. That never would have happened except for hack Democrat lawyers ramming casino laws through state legislatures. Who now have Indian campaign contributions streaming into Democrat coffers.

 


138 posted on 06/13/2004 10:06:50 AM PDT by dennisw ("Allah FUBAR!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
First you said they were only regulated by federal, then I gave you two examples of state regulation in which the Indians had to comply. Now you are asking for county - the fact is that tribes are NOT a country. Besides, you are missing the point, no where did I ask for tribes to be stopped from their businesses, in each post I asked that all the other colored people could try their hand as well. Certainly you support that, do you not? Or do you believe ONLY Tribal Indians can be allowed to run a casino, have certain machines and games in Washington?
139 posted on 06/13/2004 10:07:30 AM PDT by Libertina (Reagan showed us what being a great president was all about. Thank you sir for bringing pride!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: oceanperch
"We are not terrorists. We are American Indians. We have been fighting terrorism since 1492."

Well if nothing else, the sign is rather witty.

If we proclaim that Indians shouldn't be thin-skinned when it comes to team nicknames, costumes, etc., then perhaps we should follow our own advice and not overreact to a bit of venting.

140 posted on 06/13/2004 10:07:58 AM PDT by Diddle E. Squat (If the Berlin wall could fall, CA can be brought back to the GOP. Win one for the Gipper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-249 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson