Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shoes come second in smokers' homes
Sydney Morning Herald ^ | June 11. 2004 | Adele Horin

Posted on 06/10/2004 6:43:49 PM PDT by sarcasm

Welfare and health groups have urged the NSW Government to take tougher tobacco control measures after new research showed the state's poorest families would save almost $60 a week if they could quit smoking.

The research, by Macquarie University economists, showed the next poorest 20 per cent of households would save $85 a week if the smokers quit.

The study also shows the NSW economy would not be harmed if fewer people smoked, contrary to the claims of the tobacco industry.

The study was commissioned by the Cancer Council of NSW and conducted by David Collins, adjunct professor in economics at Macquarie University, his colleague William Junor, and Helen Lapsley, a health economist at the University of Queensland.

Gary Moore, of the NSW Council of Social Service, said: "We believe tougher measures to counter tobacco would help families struggling on a low income who are finding it difficult to quit."

The study, to be released today, said the poorest one-fifth of households spent 18 per cent of their income on cigarettes, while the richest spent 3 per cent.

Smoking households - defined as a household where money was spent on tobacco - spent relatively less on clothes, shoes, education, housing and health than non-smoking households.

If people could give up smoking it was likely they would spend more on these items, and enjoy health benefits as well, the research shows.

"A reduction in smoking in NSW could constitute a significant step towards reducing the impact of poverty in the state," it says.

The study also found that big reductions in the prevalence of smoking over five or 10 years would have no significant impact on employment, output or profits in any business sector, apart from the tobacco industry.

Professor Collins said: "The tobacco industry has lost the health argument and now argues it generates employment and output. But if the tobacco industry disappeared overnight there would not be 57,700 fewer jobs. If people don't spend the money on smoking they would spend it on something else, which would generate jobs and output."

The researchers conducted a detailed examination of the impact of reduced tobacco expenditure on 106 industries and of the effects on them of the expenditure being redirected.

"Because the economic effects were close to neutral, they are not an issue which should be taken into account in the framing of public health policy," the study says.

Anita Tang, director of health strategies at the Cancer Council, said NSW should match other states in per capita expenditure on tobacco control. An investment of $13.5 million a year - instead of the current $4 million - would reduce the prevalence of smoking by 1 per cent a year.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: health; nannystate; pufflist; smoking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: hotshot
My Inlaws both each smoke 4 packs a day. Every waking hour there is a cig in their hand. That's $3.00 x 4 x 2 x 30 which equals $ 720.00 a month out of their $2000.00 a month retirement. They charge a negative $400 a month on credit cards. The dope dealer down the road could not get a better customer.

Egads!  I can't even imagine smoking 4 packs a day.  I've smoked on the average of a pack and a half to two packs a day.  Any more then that, I don't have enough to do!

They sure could save a lot of money if they rolled their own or bought off of the Internet or a Reservation if they live close enough to one.  Reservations sell over the Net as well.

"Dope dealer?"  They are on dope too? 

61 posted on 06/11/2004 5:45:43 AM PDT by SheLion (Don Imus is voting for FnKerry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm

Have they done any studies on how many obese people were NOT obese when they smoked?


62 posted on 06/11/2004 6:19:42 AM PDT by McGavin999 (If Kerry can't deal with the "Republican Attack Machine" how is he going to deal with Al Qaeda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
That's $260.00 per month!
What could you buy for $260.00 per month??


Here are some cars you could buy for about that much money per month... looks like the poor are poor because they choose to be poor. Bad choices.

Monthly Payment: All new vehicles $200 - $299.

The new vehicles that fit into your monthly payment (based on MSRP) are listed below. Click on the vehicle name that you are interested in to learn more.

Get more vehicles for less money. Check Used Cars for pricing and listings.

Your monthly payment is . Show me in this price range.

Chevrolet Cavalier MSRP $10,325 - $17,710
Chevrolet Colorado MSRP $15,695 - $28,330
Chevrolet Malibu MSRP $18,995 - $23,855
Chevrolet Silverado 1500 MSRP $18,545 - $39,905
Chevrolet Tracker MSRP $19,865 - $22,715
Chrysler PT Cruiser MSRP $17,490 - $25,460
Chrysler PT Cruiser Convertible MSRP $19,405 - $27,565
Chrysler Sebring MSRP $18,465 - $30,845
Dodge Caravan MSRP $18,330 - $21,820
Dodge Dakota MSRP $17,200 - $24,835
Dodge Neon MSRP $13,490 - $17,640
Dodge Ram 1500 MSRP $19,855 - $45,000
Dodge Stratus MSRP $18,710 - $22,695
Ford Escape MSRP $19,265 - $26,365
Ford F-150 Heritage MSRP $19,610 - $33,035
Ford Focus MSRP $13,005 - $17,905
Ford Mustang MSRP $18,035 - $29,135
Ford Ranger MSRP $14,575 - $26,015
Ford Taurus MSRP $20,485 - $23,345
GMC Canyon MSRP $16,025 - $28,000
GMC Sierra 1500 MSRP $18,545 - $41,905
Honda Accord MSRP $15,900 - $28,500
Honda Civic MSRP $13,010 - $19,650
Honda CR-V MSRP $19,000 - $21,750
Honda Element MSRP $16,100 - $20,300
Honda Insight MSRP $19,180 - $21,380
Hyundai Santa Fe MSRP $17,999 - $25,499
Hyundai Sonata MSRP $15,999 - $19,799
Hyundai Tiburon MSRP $16,999 - $20,497
Isuzu Rodeo MSRP $19,799 - $25,699
Jeep Liberty MSRP $18,380 - $24,340
Jeep Wrangler MSRP $16,635 - $25,450
Kia Optima MSRP $15,500 - $19,595
Kia Sedona MSRP $19,975 - $22,085
Kia Sorento MSRP $18,995 - $25,200
Mazda B2300 MSRP $14,925 - $18,725
Mazda B3000 MSRP $18,005 - $19,885
Mazda Mazda3 MSRP $13,680 - $16,895
Mazda Mazda6 MSRP $18,895 - $22,895
Mazda Tribute MSRP $19,320 - $24,080
MINI Cooper MSRP $16,449 - $16,449
MINI Cooper S MSRP $19,899 - $19,899
Mitsubishi Eclipse MSRP $18,399 - $24,649
Mitsubishi Galant MSRP $17,997 - $25,697
Mitsubishi Lancer MSRP $13,597 - $17,997
Mitsubishi Lancer Sportback MSRP $16,709 - $19,319
Mitsubishi Outlander MSRP $18,449 - $22,349
Nissan Altima MSRP $17,200 - $26,900
Nissan Frontier MSRP $13,390 - $27,570
Nissan Sentra MSRP $12,400 - $17,500
Nissan Xterra MSRP $18,000 - $28,000
Oldsmobile Alero MSRP $18,485 - $23,335
Pontiac Grand Am MSRP $22,280 - $23,530
Pontiac Vibe MSRP $16,915 - $20,240
Saturn ION MSRP $10,430 - $20,385
Saturn L300 MSRP $21,370 - $21,370
Saturn VUE MSRP $17,025 - $26,195
Subaru Impreza MSRP $18,020 - $24,620
Subaru Outback Sport MSRP $19,220 - $19,220
Suzuki Aerio MSRP $13,499 - $16,999
Suzuki Aerio SX MSRP $15,499 - $17,299
Suzuki Forenza MSRP $13,199 - $16,699
Suzuki Grand Vitara MSRP $18,199 - $22,699
Suzuki Verona MSRP $17,199 - $20,199
Suzuki Vitara V6 MSRP $16,999 - $18,199
Toyota Camry MSRP $18,045 - $25,405
Toyota Camry Solara MSRP $19,220 - $29,450
Toyota Celica MSRP $17,570 - $22,235
Toyota Corolla MSRP $13,680 - $17,455
Toyota Matrix MSRP $14,760 - $18,750
Toyota RAV4 MSRP $18,450 - $19,850
Toyota Tacoma MSRP $12,460 - $22,700
Volkswagen Golf MSRP $15,580 - $19,320
Volkswagen GTI MSRP $19,250 - $22,070
Volkswagen Jetta MSRP $17,430 - $23,800
Volkswagen New Beetle MSRP $16,330 - $24,820

63 posted on 06/11/2004 6:20:33 AM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
Does your maiden name start with an E ? LOL I think you girls are related somehow.

LOL!!!! No, my maiden name starts with an R!!!

64 posted on 06/11/2004 6:51:56 AM PDT by Gabz (RIP President Ronald W. Reagan 1911-2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
[ The research, by Macquarie University economists, showed the next poorest 20 per cent of households would save $85 a week if the smokers quit. ]

What report does NOT show is How much of the $85 is TAXES..
The tobacco industry are merely businessmen, GOVERNMENT is the VAMPIRE.

65 posted on 06/11/2004 6:53:03 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Another thing no one mentioned in this article: how about the elderly doing with out prescription drugs just so they can put food on their tables? How about that?

Well if they didn't smoke, they would need the prescriptions.........(/sarcasm)

66 posted on 06/11/2004 6:56:22 AM PDT by Gabz (RIP President Ronald W. Reagan 1911-2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
showed the state's poorest families would save almost $60 a week if they could quit smoking

Translatio= the gov't is using my hard earned dollars to subsidize welfare smokers.

Reccomendation= Lets lower the checks of smokers on welfare by $60 per week. Apparently they don't need it for essentials.

67 posted on 06/11/2004 7:03:07 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy
Now let me get this straight. If people don't spend money on tobacco, they can spend it on something else.

Or better yet, invest it. Very good for the economy.

68 posted on 06/11/2004 7:04:41 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FrankR
Either way, it's money pissed away...but it's their money, and IT'S THEIR BUSINESS.

Its not there money. We subsidize it.

69 posted on 06/11/2004 7:06:26 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
$8.00 a pack? Gee, why don't they cut the $7.00 of taxes out and the poor can save $50 a week without doing anything?

We give them the money to purchase the cigs anyways. Its not costing them. If they have excess cash from welfare to spend on cig's then we should lower their aid.

70 posted on 06/11/2004 7:07:48 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
OOPS....my husband just reminded me that it's 45+ pairs of shoes....

Perhaps you should consider taking up smoking.

71 posted on 06/11/2004 7:10:02 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
No impact on employment???????? Try looking at all the business's closing and/or cutting their staff because of the forced smoking bans.

Maybe, but overall employment is rising. Therefore this proves out what the economist is saying. If its true that people are losing smoking related jobs, they are finding employment elsewhere. This means folks are spending or investing their tobacco dollars.

72 posted on 06/11/2004 7:10:30 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SALChamps03

Well said.


73 posted on 06/11/2004 7:12:34 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm

They should just cut their smoking in half and learn to hop everywhere on one foot. Problem solved


74 posted on 06/11/2004 7:13:42 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG

ROFL!!!!!!!!!


75 posted on 06/11/2004 7:18:12 AM PDT by Gabz (RIP President Ronald W. Reagan 1911-2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
My wife has shoes in the closet that have NEVER even been worn. I know, she's just another American gal who thinks she needs more shoes than she could ever wear out.

When the big one hits and you are walking around barefoot and she has plenty of shoes to wear... then you will be sorry you didn't follow her example. < /survivalist off >

76 posted on 06/11/2004 7:19:40 AM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Latine loqui coactus sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
"Its not there money. We subsidize it."

Well, we subsidize studying the mating habits of the rainforest tree frog, space exploration, reforestation, environmentalism, endless global warming screwballs, airline travel, tomato growers, athletes, and countless other "golden fleece" money giveaways, but I don't hear any mass whining on how that money is spent wasted.

You have to decide if you're pissed about the money, or the tobacco angle.
77 posted on 06/11/2004 7:33:26 AM PDT by FrankR (A fanatic is one who won't change his mind, and can't change the subject...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear
I could buy the cheapest shoes in America and never wear them out, now the wheels on my chair are a different story. They get replaced every year whether they need it or not. < /survivalist off >

So, yes, I guess I am as bad as the girls are about buying things when I don't really need them and I don't even look for sales!

78 posted on 06/11/2004 7:43:14 AM PDT by B4Ranch ( GET READY!!...........http://www.ready.gov/get_a_kit.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: FrankR
You have to decide if you're pissed about the money, or the tobacco angle.

The heck with compassion. I call myself a selfish conservative. If my dollars are going to the poor to be spent on nonessentials, I'd rather keep the money myself. If a smoker can get by with less money, then we should cut their welfare checks by the same amount they spend on tobacco.

As for the high tax, I think the better compromise solution is to raise the tax. That way we are making them rebate their welfare to the state when its used on tobacco.

79 posted on 06/11/2004 7:50:12 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
As for the high tax, I think the better compromise solution is to raise the tax. That way we are making them rebate their welfare to the state when its used on tobacco.

And what about those of us spending our own money.............why should we be forced to "rebate" to the state?

80 posted on 06/11/2004 7:54:54 AM PDT by Gabz (RIP President Ronald W. Reagan 1911-2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson