Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Smoker's saliva a 'cocktail of chemicals'
Yahoo ^ | 06/02/04 | Reuters

Posted on 06/02/2004 4:43:14 AM PDT by Colosis

LONDON (Reuters) - Smoking destroys protective molecules in saliva and transforms it into a dangerous cocktail of chemicals that increases the risk of mouth cancer, scientists say.

"Cigarette smoke is not only damaging on its own, it can turn the body against itself," said Dr Rafi Nagler, of the Technion-Israel Institute of Technology in Haifa, Israel.

Saliva contains antioxidants, molecules that normally protect the body against cancer, but Nagler and his colleagues have discovered that cigarette smoke destroys the molecules and turns saliva into a dangerous compound.

"Our study shows that once exposed to cigarette smoke, our normally healthy saliva not only loses its beneficial qualities but it turns traitor and actually aids in destroying the cells of the mouth and oral cavity," he added.

In research reported in the British Journal of Cancer on Wednesday, Nagler and his team studied the impact of cigarette smoke on cancerous cells in the laboratory.

Half of the cells were exposed to saliva exposed to cigarette smoke and the other half just to the smoke. Cells exposed to the saliva mixture had more damage and it increased along with the time of exposure.

"Most people will find it very shocking that the mixture of saliva and smoke is actually more lethal to cells in the mouth than cigarette smoke alone," Nagler added in a statement.

Smoking and drinking are the leading causes of head and neck or oral cancers, which includes cancer of the lip, mouth, tongue, gums, larynx and pharynx. Nearly 400,000 new cases of the illness are diagnosed worldwide each year with the majority in developing countries. The five-year survival rates are less than 50 percent.

Nagler and his colleagues believe the research could open up new avenues to develop better treatments to prevent oral cancer.

"This insight into how mouth cancer can develop offers more reasons for smokers to try and quit," said Jean King, of Cancer Research UK, which publishes the journal. "People know the link with lung cancer and this research adds compelling evidence about the damage smoking can do to the mouth."


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: health; pufflist; smokers; smoking; smokingbans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 901-905 next last
To: bikepacker67

So you are in favor of government mandated showers so your delicate olfactory senses are not offended?


41 posted on 06/02/2004 7:58:19 AM PDT by Gabz (Ted Kennedy has killed more people than all SHS combined.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
So you are in favor of government mandated showers so your delicate olfactory senses are not offended?

No. I'm in favor of banning the malodorous (In the same fashion as noise ordinances).

Whether they take a shower or not (or quit the noxious weed) is up to them.

42 posted on 06/02/2004 8:02:58 AM PDT by bikepacker67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Colosis
Maybe they should ban smokers, now that their saliva is a threat to us all.

Years ago in high school we discovered that kissing a girl that smoked was like licking a used ashtray.

43 posted on 06/02/2004 8:05:25 AM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bikepacker67

In other words you want the government to dictate the behavior of others for your convenience.

How nice.


44 posted on 06/02/2004 8:07:35 AM PDT by Gabz (Ted Kennedy has killed more people than all SHS combined.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: bikepacker67
Why do smokers discount science as "junk"?

It is well documented that smokers are in 'denial' about the hazards of smoking.

45 posted on 06/02/2004 8:07:35 AM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
It is well documented that smokers are in 'denial' about the hazards of smoking.

It is well documented that you are in 'denial' as to the threat of governmental powers becoming to intrusive on private property.

What's your point?

46 posted on 06/02/2004 8:11:10 AM PDT by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
In other words you want the government to dictate the behavior of others for your convenience.

We do that ALL THE TIME!

Speed limits, anti-SPAM laws, (once again)... noise ordinances, public drinking... etc.

Where do you get off thinking YOU have the right to stink up everyone else?

That's the question!

47 posted on 06/02/2004 8:13:24 AM PDT by bikepacker67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

Comment #48 Removed by Moderator

Comment #49 Removed by Moderator

To: bikepacker67
Where do you get off thinking YOU have the right to stink up everyone else?

I get off thinking that it should be up to the owner of the property to allow, or disallow, a legal activity.

Where do YOU get off thinking you have the RIGHT to make the rules for a private property owner using junk science as a basis?

50 posted on 06/02/2004 8:15:49 AM PDT by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

Comment #51 Removed by Moderator

To: Just another Joe
I get off thinking that it should be up to the owner of the property to allow, or disallow, a legal activity.

So... you'd be in favor of allowing businesses to allow "Blacks Only" (or of course, the more likely)?

52 posted on 06/02/2004 8:18:40 AM PDT by bikepacker67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe
You can go f%*$ yourself with the addict prefix.

Truth hurts, eh?

53 posted on 06/02/2004 8:20:48 AM PDT by bikepacker67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: bikepacker67
So... you'd be in favor of allowing businesses to allow "Blacks Only" (or of course, the more likely)?

Yes I would be in favor of a business owner allowing those they chose to enter, or not enter, their place of business. That would be freedom of association.

I wouldn't do business with that owner but I think they should be allowed to do it.

54 posted on 06/02/2004 8:21:06 AM PDT by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: bikepacker67

Being offended by particular scents is a purely personal and subjective issue.

Where do YOU get off thinking YOU have the right to determine what "stinks" to others?

That is the question.


55 posted on 06/02/2004 8:22:05 AM PDT by Gabz (Ted Kennedy has killed more people than all SHS combined.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: bikepacker67
No, the only thing that hurts is that you don't do your own research.
You allow yourself to be led by the nose by nannys with too tight hairnets.
56 posted on 06/02/2004 8:22:10 AM PDT by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe

If all you have are personal insults, contrary to posting guidelines, please do not post to me.


57 posted on 06/02/2004 8:23:25 AM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: All
You know the funny thing is, I completely disagree with the confiscatory taxes applied to tobacco - I just don't want to be forced to smell that crap wherever I go.

And thankfully, it is getting so I no longer have to.

58 posted on 06/02/2004 8:24:12 AM PDT by bikepacker67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
It is well documented that smokers are in 'denial' about the hazards of smoking.

My beautiful mother was in denial for 61 years, she is having her right lung and lymph nodes removed next week.

Cancer.

59 posted on 06/02/2004 8:24:29 AM PDT by Hillary's Lovely Legs (I am trying to stop an outbreak here and you're driving the monkey to the airport.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Colosis

I remember an old Saturday Live routine, where the newscaster, Chevy Chase, reported that saliva has been found to cause cancer, but only when swallowed in small amounts over a long period of time.


60 posted on 06/02/2004 8:24:45 AM PDT by MontanaBeth (Irritating a Democrat a day, since 1970)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 901-905 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson