To: Just another Joe
I get off thinking that it should be up to the owner of the property to allow, or disallow, a legal activity. So... you'd be in favor of allowing businesses to allow "Blacks Only" (or of course, the more likely)?
To: bikepacker67
So... you'd be in favor of allowing businesses to allow "Blacks Only" (or of course, the more likely)?Yes I would be in favor of a business owner allowing those they chose to enter, or not enter, their place of business. That would be freedom of association.
I wouldn't do business with that owner but I think they should be allowed to do it.
54 posted on
06/02/2004 8:21:06 AM PDT by
Just another Joe
(Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
To: bikepacker67
So... you'd be in favor of allowing businesses to allow "Blacks Only....
Specious. People are not born smokers. They are not minorities. Their addiction or habit fouls the air. Their addiction is of their choosing.
73 posted on
06/02/2004 9:06:16 AM PDT by
wtc911
(keep one eye on that candle....)
To: bikepacker67
So... you'd be in favor of allowing businesses to allow "Blacks Only" Only if the don't smoke.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson