Skip to comments.
Florida: For restaurants' banned smokers, it's great outdoors
Sun Sentinel ^
| 315-04
| Georgia East
Posted on 03/16/2004 5:48:38 AM PST by SheLion
The very next week I went to the bank and requested a loan," said DeFrancisci, who spent $215,000 to build a deck so diners could smoke outdoors.
Some restaurant owners who can't or don't want to expand outdoor seating have another option -- limiting their menus to keep their indoor smoking privileges. The constitutional amendment voters approved in 2002 allows smoking in bars that take in less than 10 percent of their revenue from food sales.
..........a 40 percent rise in requests for outdoor tables.
(Excerpt) Read more at sun-sentinel.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: antismokers; bans; butts; cigarettes; individualliberty; lawmakers; maine; niconazis; professional; prohibitionists; pufflist; smokingbans; taxes; tobacco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
"If all the smokers had gone out and voted, the turnout would have been different," Suave said. Full Story Here
1
posted on
03/16/2004 5:48:40 AM PST
by
SheLion
To: *puff_list; Just another Joe; Great Dane; Max McGarrity; Madame Dufarge; MeeknMing; steve50; ...
2
posted on
03/16/2004 5:49:04 AM PST
by
SheLion
(Curiosity killed the cat BUT satisfaction brought her back!!!)
To: SheLion
That's fine for Florida, what about the Northern tier states?
And what about private property rights? Is there still such a thing in the USA of today?
3
posted on
03/16/2004 5:58:13 AM PST
by
Just another Joe
(FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
To: SheLion
Laura Earl and I are getting married the 27th of this month and we are honeymooning in FLA. I will report back when I return. I plan to interview the people at every restaurant we go to about the ban and business.
CG
4
posted on
03/16/2004 5:59:55 AM PST
by
Conspiracy Guy
(Proud to be among the most hated Freepers at DU. Boo Troll !)
To: Just another Joe
That's fine for Florida, what about the Northern tier states?Like northern Maine, for instance? ugh!
And what about private property rights? Is there still such a thing in the USA of today?
No one mentions THIS in the article, do they Joe?
5
posted on
03/16/2004 6:01:39 AM PST
by
SheLion
(Curiosity killed the cat BUT satisfaction brought her back!!!)
To: Just another Joe; SheLion
That's fine for Florida, what about the Northern tier states? heck not even just the northern ones...........it's cold and raining here right now and they've got an inch of snow in parts of Delaware and sleet in other areas.....
I'm headed up there this afternoon for a couple of days. I plan on checking in on some of my former haunts to see how they are doing.....including the ones that are thumbing their noses at the ban and have been since it went into effect over a year ago.
As to private property rights....the only ones left are those where people actually understand the term.
6
posted on
03/16/2004 6:02:41 AM PST
by
Gabz
(The tobacco industry doesn't pay cigarette taxes - smokers do!)
To: Conspiracy Guy
Laura Earl and I are getting married the 27th of this month and we are honeymooning in FLA. I will report back when I return. I plan to interview the people at every restaurant we go to about the ban and business.CG! Congratulations!!!! And any report you can give us would be greatly appreciated!
From now until next November, it will be nice sitting outside at a restaurant to have a meal in Florida. It's beautiful there, I admit. But no one mentions the private property rights in this article. Perhaps you can bring that up while your there.
Keep us posted.11 days to go, CG!!!
7
posted on
03/16/2004 6:05:50 AM PST
by
SheLion
(Curiosity killed the cat BUT satisfaction brought her back!!!)
To: Gabz
I'm headed up there this afternoon for a couple of days. Does that mean you won't be around for a few days, Gabz? Thanks for letting us know!! I would have wondered what happened to you. :)
8
posted on
03/16/2004 6:07:17 AM PST
by
SheLion
(Curiosity killed the cat BUT satisfaction brought her back!!!)
To: SheLion
"If all the smokers had gone out and voted, the turnout would have been different,"They voted on this?
9
posted on
03/16/2004 6:08:32 AM PST
by
kahoutek
((A conservative is a liberal who's been mugged))
To: SheLion
Although I must admit I like not having to smell cigarette smoke at my favorite sports bar, this ammendment was an assault on liberty and property rights.
To: SheLion
I'll be back Thursday afternoon....it's just a quick trip..I've got some business to attend to, most of which is in regard to the smoking ban.
11
posted on
03/16/2004 6:13:00 AM PST
by
Gabz
(The tobacco industry doesn't pay cigarette taxes - smokers do!)
To: SheLion
If all the smokers had gone out and voted, the turnout would have been different The other side played a dastardly trick, and put the polling places at the top of three, four, and even five-step staircases.
12
posted on
03/16/2004 6:18:36 AM PST
by
steve-b
To: Gabz
I'll be back Thursday afternoon....it's just a quick trip..I've got some business to attend to, most of which is in regard to the smoking ban. Ok! Drive safe!!
13
posted on
03/16/2004 6:18:53 AM PST
by
SheLion
(Curiosity killed the cat BUT satisfaction brought her back!!!)
To: kahoutek
They voted on this? Yes. But not everyone turned out. And this is what happened. And those that did vote YES, didn't realize the full implications of the ban.
14
posted on
03/16/2004 6:20:09 AM PST
by
SheLion
(Curiosity killed the cat BUT satisfaction brought her back!!!)
To: kahoutek
It was a constitutional amendment.
23% of the elegible voters turned out for it. Who knows the percentage of smokers that turned out.
They also made it a constitutional amendment to ban the abuse of pot bellied pigs.
At least they attempted to do it the right way.
If something like these amendments are in the constitution I know it's not a state that I want to move to. I don't care what the weather is like.
15
posted on
03/16/2004 6:20:44 AM PST
by
Just another Joe
(FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
To: Gabz
"That's fine for Florida, what about the Northern tier states?"
Exactly my sentiments, CT has even shutdown the bar smoking completely. Pathetic gestapo.
I don't smoke anything, but I see the business's hurting badly. Places are about to close, April 1 is the effective date of the next tier of nazi control.
If you think they'll stop here, you're so wrong.
IT'S ABOUT CONTROL.
To: SheLion
Here in CT, no such thing happened......in August of last year, it was announced that the ban would be in place in Oct.........
17
posted on
03/16/2004 6:22:34 AM PST
by
kahoutek
((A conservative is a liberal who's been mugged))
To: SheLion
I plan to use several points.
1. What do you think of the ban?
2. Is business up or down?
3. Do you feel your rights as a business owner are being taken away?
If you'd like to add please do. I want to ask all the same questions.
18
posted on
03/16/2004 6:22:58 AM PST
by
Conspiracy Guy
(Proud to be among the most hated Freepers at DU. Boo Troll !)
To: Just another Joe
Public property - all voters decide
BUT ON PRIVATE PROPERTY - Owners decide
How many of these voters NEVER go in the bars and places where the smokers go? This was one part of the population deciding what another group of people can do with their private property.
WRONG.
To: George from New England
CT has even shutdown the bar smoking completely. That's exctly what they did in Delaware just about a year and a half ago. The only thing that has kept some places I know in business is the fact in addition to their bar license, they have a license for sale of alcohol for off premise consumption.
If you think they'll stop here, you're so wrong.
Believe me, I know. I'm not familiar with the exact wording of the CT ban, but the DE states specifically "tobacco." Several places I know of are getting around that by no longer selling regular cigarettes, they only sell the herbal brands (not marijuana)and at least one has twice beaten fines because the gestapo could not tell if patrons were smoking the herbals ortobacco cigarettes.
One of the prime sponsors of the ban is not happy with that and has already stated she is going to look into addressing that "loophole." part of my reason for going to Delaware today is to help with discussions about that.
20
posted on
03/16/2004 6:30:23 AM PST
by
Gabz
(The tobacco industry doesn't pay cigarette taxes - smokers do!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson