Free Republic
Browse · Search
VetsCoR
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The FReeper Foxhole Remembers The Battle of The Bulge - Dec. 16th, 2002
http://hometown.aol.com/dadswar/bulge/index.htm ^ | Wesley Johnston

Posted on 12/16/2002 5:38:35 AM PST by SAMWolf

U.S. Military History, Current Events and Veterans Issues

Where Duty, Honor and Country
are acknowledged, affirmed and commemorated.

Our Mission:

The FReeper Foxhole is dedicated to Veterans of our Nation's military forces and to others who are affected in their relationships with Veterans.

We hope to provide an ongoing source of information about issues and problems that are specific to Veterans and resources that are available to Veterans and their families.

In the FReeper Foxhole, Veterans or their family members should feel free to address their specific circumstances or whatever issues concern them in an atmosphere of peace, understanding, brotherhood and support.

Resource Links For Veterans


Click on the pix

The Ardennes Offensive:
Dec. 16, 1944 - Jan. 25, 1945

Overview of the Battle of the Bulge


Note: Since all the mentions of this army and that army can become confusing, German units are given in italics, and American units are in normal type.



The Battle of the Bulge began with the German attack (Operation Wacht am Rhein and the Herbstnebel plan) on the morning of December 16, 1944. Two later attacks on New Year's Day 1945 attempted to create second fronts in Holland (Operation Schneeman) and in northern France (Operation Nordwind).

The overall German plan is laid out in the map above (from Hugh Cole's official history "The Ardennes: Battle of the Bulge", Map IX). In the original plan, three Armies (the Sixth Panzer Army [referred to by Hitler as Sixth SS Panzer Army but not formally designated as SS at the time - Cole, p. 76], Fifth Panzer Army, and Seventh Army) would attack.

In a revised plan on November 1, 1944, the Sixth Panzer Army, for political reasons [Cole, p. 34], was given the official role of making the main effort and capturing Antwerp.



The Fifth Panzer Army was not designated as the main force in name, but it actually had the responsibility of hitting the center of the American lines, promptly capturing the highly strategic rail and road center of St. Vith, and driving on to capture Brussels.

The Seventh Army in the south was to peel off as it moved west and then turn and form a defensive line, in order to form a buffer area to prevent U.S. reinforcements from hitting the Fifth Panzer Army.

In the offical order signed by Hitler on November 10, 1944, the Fifteenth Army was added [Cole, pp. 34-36]:

The Fifteenth Army "was not to be employed until the Allies had reacted in force to the German attack, and in any case could not be expected to launch a large-scale attack until the Allied front east of Aachen had been drastically denuded of troops."

In fact, on December 13, 1944, the US 2nd Infantry Division began an attack in the Fifteenth Army area that further nullified any effect the Fifteenth Army might have in the attack.

With the exception of the critical road and rail center at St. Vith, the main towns were to be bypassed by the attacking panzer (armored) forces, so that the speed of the attack would not be slowed. Rear echelon infantry would clean out the bypassed towns. The military goal was to capture Antwerp and cut off the Allied troops to the north. The political goal was to cause division among the Allies and destroy the Allied coalition.

The terrain was the dense Ardennes Forest. The weather was chilly mist and fog, so that Allied air support was nullified until December 23. (In fact, one of the German plans was named Herbstnebel or Autumn Mist.) In addition, ground visibility for the troops was often very low, due to the trees and fog. The dense forest had very few roads, none of which were large. Traffic jams on both sides of the front were a major problem for both Armies.



The only railroad on the entire front to cross from Germany into Belgium came to St. Vith, Belgium, making St. Vith, which was also a major road junction the most vital initial prize the Germans sought, in order to allow supplies to flow to support the remainder of the attack. It was no accident that St. Vith was right in the very center of the Fifth and Sixth Panzer Armies: St. Vith had to be the main line of supply for both Armies. The German plan called for capture of St. Vith by 1800 on December 17 by Fifth Panzer Army, but the defenders held at St. Vith until late on December 21. This led the German Fifth Panzer Army Commander, Gen. Hasso von Manteuffel, to recommend to Hitler's adjutant on December 24 that "the German Army give up the attack and return to the West Wall." Manteuffel's reason for this recommendation was "due to the time lost by his Fifth Panzer Army in the St. Vith area." [Manteuffel press conference of 22 December 1964 in Watertown, NY]

Hitler did not accept Manteuffel's recommendation, and the German supplies began to run out. German columns ran low on gas and ammunition well before reaching even their first major goal: the Meuse River. On December 23, the weather cleared, and Allied planes finally filled the skies in support of the besieged American troops. (Some of the GI's had wondered why they saw German planes before that, despite the conditions, but saw no American planes.)



Slowly but surely the Allies -- from the North, the West, and the South -- closed the salient, the Bulge. The First US Army troops from the north met the Third US Army troops from the south at Houffalize, Belgium on January 16, 1945. St. Vith was recaptured on January 23, 1945. The ending date of the Bulge is considered as January 25, 1945, since this was the date on which the lost positions were officially thought to have been completely regained. In fact, as a series of letters in the VBOB "Bulge Bugle" have noted, some positions were not regained until after January 25, 1945.

In the largest battle ever fought by the U. S. Army, with 600,000 GI's involved, it is difficult to place one unit or location ahead of another in importance. But the reality is that two crucial stands at the front lines are what really doomed the German attack to certain failure:

Holding the Northern Shoulder:
The 99th Infantry Divsion and the 291st Engineer Combat Battalion bore the brunt of the Sixth Panzer Army attack on Day 1, and they held most of their ground, creating what would become the northern shoulder. (Keep in mind that the southern shoulder was one that the Germans themselves intended to form with their Seventh Army -- which they pretty much succeeded in doing.)

Holding St. Vith:
The 7th Armored Division and the 106th Infantry Division, with elements of the 9th Armored Division and 28th Infantry Division, held St. Vith four days beyond the German timetable. Even the German Fifth Panzer Army commander recognized that the attack was doomed as a result.



It is significant to note that the 7th Armored Division was near Aachen, Germany when the German attack began. The 7th Armored Division had to move 60-70 miles to the south on Day 2. If the 99th Infantry Division and 291st Engineer Combat Battalion had not held on the northern shoulder, the 7th Armored Division never would have reached St. Vith. Even when the 7th Armored Division had reached St. Vith, it was the troops on the northern shoulder and the newly arrived 82nd Airborne Division that kept a very narrow escape route open for the virtually surrounded defenders of St. Vith. But once the defense of St. Vith was set up, that defense also bolstered the defense of the northern shoulder, as both defenses forced the German columns off of their planned routes and led to considerable congestion as the Gemran columns were then funneled in between the northern shoulder and the St. Vith salient.

But what about Bastogne?
In popular thinking, the Battle of the Bulge is synonymous with the Battle of Bastogne. This is very unfortunate, since it ignores the real military keys (holding the northern shoulder and holding St. Vith) to the defeat of the Germans. Journalists hungry for some sign of American success at stopping the German onslaught played up the defense of Bastogne, where Gen. Anthony McAuliffe (101st Airborne Division) said "Nuts" to a German surrender demand and where the Third US Army (10th Armored Division) broke through the German Seventh Army's buffer to reach the surrounded town on Day 3 of the Battle of the Bulge. This was truly heroic stuff.

But from a military strategy point of view (and this can easily be seen on the map above), while Bastogne was a strategically important major road junction for sustaining the attack, it was on the periphery of the attack and well behind the initial front lines. The German plan was to have the panzers bypass Bastogne and let the later echelons of infantry and artillery units clean it out. And the panzers did succeed in bypassing Bastogne, so that their plan in that sector was on schedule. As a source for rallying U. S. spirits, the defense of Bastogne and McAuliffe's "Nuts" were a success.

But from a strategic perspective, the German fate had already been sealed at St. Vith, when they could not take that critical supply center on Day 2 - nor on Days 3, 4, 5, and most of 6. Bastogne did not become surrounded by forces intent on taking it until the night of December 21, Day 6 of the Battle of the Bulge. And the famous "Nuts" did not come until December 22, Day 7. Heroic as the deeds of the defenders of Bastogne were, the defense of Bastogne is a very important secondary element but not one of the true strategic keys to the German failure.





Since the battle was so complex, it is important to consider some basic organizing themes.



TOPICS: VetsCoR
KEYWORDS: ardennes; bulge; freeperfoxhole; wwii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-215 next last
To: SAMWolf
Yes, Patton was really not a happy camper when they overlooked some of his divisions for medals and awards. The 90th was in line for an award and it was given to the 101st Airborne instead. Patton said it was a political decision.
101 posted on 12/16/2002 12:59:56 PM PST by MistyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Homer_J_Simpson
Thank God for your father, and all the fathers, husbands and boys who fought and died to save our country from the horrors of national socialism and Japanese domination.
102 posted on 12/16/2002 1:14:26 PM PST by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
Oh...I just found this

90th Division in WWII

Medal of Honor 2

Distinquished Service Cross 78
Legion of Merit 6
Distinquished Flying Cross 4
Silver Star 1311
Soldier's Medal 40
Bronze Star Heroic 3526
Bronze Star Merit 1531
Air Medal 115

Attached Units:

June 44 thru May 45: Killed in Action 3,124 Enlisted

216 Officers

Died of Wounds 500 Enlisted

31 Officers

Died of Injuries 11 Enlisted

7 Officers

Seriously wounded in Action 4,602 Enlisted

263 Officers

Seriously Injured in Action 838 Enlisted

18 Officers

Lightly Wounded in Action 7,287 Enlisted

409 Officers

Lightly Injured in Action 1,360 Enlisted

47 Officers

Missing in Action 2,567 Enlisted

93 Officers

Totals 20,293 Enlisted

1,078 Officers

Total Treated by Medical Units:

Non-Battle Injuries 976

Misc Diseases and Injury 9,936
Total Battle Wounds 15,076
Respiratory 2,046
Trench Foot 1,201
Mines & Booby Traps 131
Small Arms 3,121
Shell and Mortar 8,060
Bayonet 13
Hand Grenades 51
Bomb Fragment 95
Battle Exhaustion 1,830
Battle Injury 1.770 Ju

103 posted on 12/16/2002 1:15:08 PM PST by MistyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: MistyCA
Medals have become an increasingly political decision.
In my old unit, we had a guy who did nothing but dig holes and sleeeeeeeep.
He got an Army Achievement Medal for it.
I watched guys I trained who deserved getting props like that get over-looked purposefully.
I only saw ONE guy I trained get any recognition, and that was because both he and I were put in for it. So the cap played favorite and chose him. (I don't hold any animosity towards him for it. He deserved it. It's just insulting to it when one of 'my troops' gets recognition, and some clod gets recognition for doing nothing but dig and sleep.)
104 posted on 12/16/2002 1:52:53 PM PST by Darksheare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
Yes, and then there are those my my husband's step-dad who were wounded in battle, received a purple heart, got the paperwork for it, had an article written in the news about it, and now the military has lost those records and can't confirm it! Now, I wonder if it has anything to do with some sort of benefits he should have had all these years???
105 posted on 12/16/2002 2:31:53 PM PST by MistyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
I am in and out...mostly out. :)
106 posted on 12/16/2002 2:33:01 PM PST by MistyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: All
July 2, 1980

Major Arthur C. Parker
Leeds, Alabama 35905

Dear Major Parker,
Through correspondence with Henry D. Healan, M Company, 423rd Infantry, I have learned of your whereabouts. It is a little late for me to be writing you about The Battle of the Bulge, but I have been totally unaware of your whereabouts all these years.

In The Battle of the Bulge, I was commanding the 82nd Airborne Division and we were originally given the front from Trois Ponts to Vielsalm, including Their Dumont. We got into very heavy fighting when the 1st regiment of the First SS Panzers Division broke through the Engineer's front and occupied Stoumont. We then had the remainder of the Division at Trois Ponts. At the same time, in twenty-four hours, it became apparent that the Germans were bypassing us, moving to the west, turning north when the opportunity presented itself. The 7th Armored and part of the 28th Infantry Division and a few of the 106th came through our lines.

I was in the town of Fraiture, one mile northeast, the afternoon you made your great stand at the crossroads. I had sent a Company from the 325th under Captain Woodruff, to the crossroads to help hold it, so I started over in that direction myself. The fire was so intense, however, that there was no way of getting there without crawling through the woods, and it was still some distance away. I decided that I had better get more help, so I sent to the extreme left flank of the division for the 2nd Battalion of the 504th, where it had the 1st SS Regiment of the First Panzer Division bottled. In doing so, we uncovered the Germans and during the night of Christmas Eve they slipped through the 505th Parachute Infantry. Nevertheless, I got the 2nd Battalion of the 504th to backup the crossroads, come what may.

That stand your defenders made at the crossroads was one of the greatest actions of the war.

It gave us at least a twenty-four hour respite, so I thank you and all the brave soldiers who were under your command for that.

With best Regards
signed Lieutenant General James M. Gavin USA (Ret)
Commander, 82nd Airborne Division

107 posted on 12/16/2002 2:54:10 PM PST by SAMWolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
Sneaky Germans!...yes the plate mod on the turret certainly does look a U.S. M-10 tank destroyer.
Operation Greif [Grab!] was a failure...they projected to capture over 100 US Tanks...only got 2 Shermans....and they both broke down later.


How leathal was this thing?...only 416/9 built...3 decimated an entire Churchill tank regiment in a few minutes.
Jagdpanther said to be superior to the Tiger II.

Abandoned Jagdpanther and US M-36


It was calculated to cost the Americans the loss of 5 Shermans to destroy 1 Panther in battle.
The Russians paid heavier..as it cost them 9 T-54's to knock a Panther out of action

108 posted on 12/16/2002 2:57:34 PM PST by Light Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Light Speed
Fingers co-operate...above post on Jagdpanther should read 9-T-34's!
109 posted on 12/16/2002 3:02:28 PM PST by Light Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Light Speed
LOL! YOu had me worried there for a minute with the T-54 comment.
110 posted on 12/16/2002 3:11:31 PM PST by SAMWolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: AntiJen
No problem on international news wire copies AntiJen actually I bump into this I didn't know that somebody start this Freeper Foxhole don't worry I be around

I been hanging out at Canteen LATELYYYY

Rackkkk this part of FR
111 posted on 12/16/2002 3:13:19 PM PST by SevenofNine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: SpookBrat
I love that song "I'll be Home for Christmas". It reminds me of Christmas 1990, when I was on the other side of the world from my family. My AF unit was deployed to the United Arab Emirates for Desert Storm. It was strange that during a time of year for "peace on earth, good will to men" we were preparing for war which was only a few weeks away.
112 posted on 12/16/2002 3:28:35 PM PST by Jen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: SevenofNine
The FReeper Foxhole is a new daily thread. We've been trying hard to get the word out so FReepers will know it's over here in the VetsCoR forum. I'm so glad you dropped in, Seven. Come back every day and give us your special news updates! ;-)
113 posted on 12/16/2002 3:30:30 PM PST by Jen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook
Did you ever get to meet Patton? Thanks for telling us about your service during the Battle of the Bulge. I'm so glad you made it home.
114 posted on 12/16/2002 3:34:58 PM PST by Jen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: MistyCA
The Third Army was the Mean Machine ;-)Wow!They were the original Rolling Thunder.

I just know that Clint Eastwood,Donald Sutherland and Don Rickles from Kelley's Heroes had to be from the Third Army ;-)lol
115 posted on 12/16/2002 3:37:43 PM PST by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: AntiJen
I am reading & learning more for my 2004 trip.
116 posted on 12/16/2002 3:37:46 PM PST by larryjohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: ProudEagle; SAMWolf; MistyCA; All
Thanks for your post. I think it's very appropriate in the Foxhole.

Senator Schumer needs to hear from Veterans!

Here's contact info:

313 Hart Senate Building
Washington, DC 20510
Phone: 202-224-6542
Fax: 202-228-3027
TDD: 202-224-0420

Send an email

117 posted on 12/16/2002 3:43:43 PM PST by Jen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: larryjohnson
Remind me where you are going. Normandy, is it?
118 posted on 12/16/2002 3:44:57 PM PST by Jen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever
LMAO!
119 posted on 12/16/2002 3:47:21 PM PST by MistyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: AntiJen
Thanks for that information about the Senator, and the email link!
120 posted on 12/16/2002 3:48:11 PM PST by MistyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-215 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
VetsCoR
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson