[Clintonfatigued]

Well, the discussing is a good thing, as the truth about her views and record are being shown the light of day.

[Tempest]

He did nominate the mental equivalent of Bozo the Clown.

[calex59]

Since you don't know how to use Paragraphs I won't read your whole post. However it sounds as if you are saying just because the idiot in Chief nominated someone we are supposed to just give them a pass? Is that it? That's not the way it works, and has never worked that way. The dimwits didn't pass most of Bush's nominees for anything, let alone judges. He had to appoint Bolton on a recess appointment to get him in office.

We need to discuss this racist, "wise Latina's" past decisions and ramblings in order to determine if she is a fit judge or not. So far she is found wanting by intelligent people, that of course leaves out any liberals in the legislature.

[Westbrook]

We are discussing this leftist loon because we have a fabian socialist, Alinski school, as POTUS.

[T Minus Four]

It’s “dyed” in the wool. Sorry, I’m a little ADD and without paragraphs I lost focus. I can fix it if you like.

[Havisham]

The more I know about her the more she seems much like a number of the personalities already on the court; that is, she is verifiably kooky. It’s terrible to realize that she is moderate-left compared to what Obama has waiting in the wings.

[gargoyle]

...This might be the only thing that POTUS Obeelsobozo has done that is legal to do. The Constitution grants that power. He has shat on all the rest of it...

...Up to US to see this Latina is disqualified to be a SCOTUS...

[Uncle Miltie]

Because she’s a racist!

[Grampa Dave]

There is a Yahoo Poll still running re the La Raza Racist Female wanting to be a Supreme:

http://js.polls.yahoo.com/quiz/quiziframe.php?poll_id=46856

Do you want Sotomayor to be confirmed? Results
Q. In a CNN/Opinion Research Corp. survey released just before the start of the Supreme Court nominee’s confirmation hearings, 47 percent of people questioned would like to see the Senate vote in favor, with 40 percent opposed and 13 percent unsure.

Where do you stand? Do you want Sotomayor to be confirmed?

Yes. Sotomayor would be a strong addition to the court. 28%

No. Sotomayor would be a detrimental addition to the court. 70%

Not sure/No opinion. 2%

85708 votes

Please to the Yahoo Link below to vote:

http://js.polls.yahoo.com/quiz/quiziframe.php?poll_id=46856

[OneWingedShark]

Don’t worry. There’s one Law that the American public is betting on that will stand defiant against the Congress’s OR the Supreme Court’s contrary wishes: The Laws of Physics... more specifically, Newton’s Laws of Motion.

Why do I say this? Because it is quite obvious that the “ruling elite” have little to no regard to what the People need. How else can you justify the record number of firearm and ammunition sales?

The point is that if these people fail to recognize the Constitution as The Supreme Law of the Land (regardless and independent of legal-twistings)... if there is no justice to/on/for the frauds, perjurers, traitors, and incompetents (on the behalf of the People) then “it is their Right, their Duty, to abolish it.”

These are the same sort of things that the Declaration of Independence was written about.