[calex59]

Since you don't know how to use Paragraphs I won't read your whole post. However it sounds as if you are saying just because the idiot in Chief nominated someone we are supposed to just give them a pass? Is that it? That's not the way it works, and has never worked that way. The dimwits didn't pass most of Bush's nominees for anything, let alone judges. He had to appoint Bolton on a recess appointment to get him in office.

We need to discuss this racist, "wise Latina's" past decisions and ramblings in order to determine if she is a fit judge or not. So far she is found wanting by intelligent people, that of course leaves out any liberals in the legislature.

[library user]

Sleeper troll. Check his post history.

[piytar]

Thank you for saving me the time of writing a response. Well said.

I’ll just add this: The judiciary is one of the three co-equal branches of government, and the SCOTUS is the top of that branch. The nine justices are appointed for life, unlike the members of the other two branches. So if this ##### doesn’t think an appointment to the SCOTUS is discussion worthy, then he/she has no clue.

[Gator113]

You said what I would have said, only better..... sooooooo, ditto.

[RedStateGuyTrappedinCT]

The dimwits didn't pass most of Bush's nominees for anything, let alone judges. He had to appoint Bolton on a recess appointment to get him in office.

The libs in the senate blocked Robert Bork's nomination and by any standard he was miles above the "wise latina", and Clarence Thomas went through h*ll in confirmation. If the "wise latina" wants to legislate from the bench and hand down racist rulings, calously messing up people's careers than she'd bloody well better be grilled in confirmation. I expect the libs will get her in but the GOP better not just roll over here or they prove they stand for nothing.

[mmp813]

Since you didn't bother to read the entire article you didn't get the full meaning. The author stated very clearly that Sonya Sotomayer is just the next step in Obama’s outrageous procession of unacceptable proposals before the American people. Compared to the others, this one seems tame. If you had the patience to excuse a computer error, instead of being so quick to criticize, you would have benefited from a well thought out article. Shame on you.