Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Meaning of 'foreknew' in Romans 8:29
The Five Points of Calvinism: Defined, Defended, Documented | 1963 | David N. Steele/Curtis C. Thomas

Posted on 07/17/2003 9:53:46 AM PDT by Frumanchu

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 581-585 next last
To: P-Marlowe; xzins; OrthodoxPresbyterian; drstevej
You are talking nonsense here and then you equate Jesus' statement of FACT that IF they had seen the same miracles, THEN they would have repented with your nonsensical statement of natural impossibility. I think you are trivializing what Jesus was saying there.

No, I'm not talking nonsense. It is a true statement by virtue of the laws of physics. If gravity were to cease, you and I would go flying off into space. It is a conditional statement of fact and the fact that it is a "natural impossibility" does not negate its factuality. More on "natural impossibility" in a second...

According to you Calviniststs, the people that Jesus was speaking to had a negative attitude towards the miracles because it was Gods perfect will that they respond negatively to the miracles. According to you Calvinists, the People of Tyre and Sidon were judged because it was God perfect will that they not repent and that they be judged. It was nothing in them, but it was what was in God. Therefore there was no "if" because the "if" that Jesus spoke of was a factual impossibility. That is dishonest. It could not be a true statement under any circumstances.

False, Marlowe. It could be a true statement if God had performed the miracles. Or is Jesus a liar?:)

There is a difference here to be noted. The situation is not one where the miracles were performed in Tyre and Sidon and they chose to ignore them, but rather that the miracles were never performed in the first place DESPITE the knowledge that performing them WOULD (not could) have brought about their repentance. The issue is not whether or not God was able to convince them with the miracles, but the fact that He knowingly withheld the means of salvation from those people.

Regardless, it comes back to the natural state of man. In his fallen state, he's going to choose against God. God doesn't have to put the suggestion in their heads...they sin all on their own. So, going back to your statement about "talking nonsense" regarding a "natural impossibility" the comparison is actually quite accurate.

In both examples (gravity and Tyre/Sidon), unless there is direct intervention on God's part (removal of gravity/performance of miracles) what is natural will occur (gravity will continue to hold us to the Earth/Tyre and Sidon will continue in their sinfulness and unrepentance). In neither case is the conditional statements proposed erroneous, invalid or dishonest. They are solidly grounded in fact.

201 posted on 12/02/2003 12:07:34 PM PST by Frumanchu (mene mene tekel upharsin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
I have such a collection, combined with some stuff I've done. It makes an excellent "sword starter kit." And, if your email has not changed lately, you should expect to have it within a few minutes. Be sure to reply and let me know that you have it.

Woody.
202 posted on 12/02/2003 12:45:40 PM PST by CCWoody (Recognize that all true Christians will be Calvinists in glory,...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody; OrthodoxPresbyterian
Don't forget to use my custom "Sword Starter Kit" logo on the box :)


203 posted on 12/02/2003 1:29:24 PM PST by Frumanchu (mene mene tekel upharsin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: CCWoody; Frumanchu
Cool... thanks to Woody, I now possess -- a library of my own books (funny, that).

Don't forget to use my custom "Sword Starter Kit" logo on the box :)

I love that picture. :-)

204 posted on 12/02/2003 1:43:44 PM PST by OrthodoxPresbyterian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
What the well-dressed and well prepared Calvinist will be wearing... :o)

The Word...don't leave home without it!

205 posted on 12/02/2003 2:44:08 PM PST by nobdysfool (All True Christians will be Calvinists in Glory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: nobdysfool
That'd make a good T-shirt.

It'd certainly get me into some good discussions with people... and probably a few arguments.

206 posted on 12/02/2003 2:53:15 PM PST by jude24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: xzins
He absolutely had to know in concert with what He was deciding.
You are absolutely correct. He decreed it. God states His objective in Rom 9:22-24.
207 posted on 12/02/2003 3:05:28 PM PST by RochesterFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: nobdysfool
If you're going to mention my name, at least have the cajones to ping me to the post.

Aren't you arguing from an unsubstantiated premise, namely that the aforementioned "cajones" exist in the first place?

208 posted on 12/02/2003 3:12:23 PM PST by Alex Murphy (Athanasius contra mundum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
Aren't you arguing from an unsubstantiated premise, namely that the aforementioned "cajones" exist in the first place?

I was giving him the benefit of the doubt, which is more than he's given me....

209 posted on 12/02/2003 3:34:02 PM PST by nobdysfool (All True Christians will be Calvinists in Glory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: xzins
What I can't get around is that, at a minimum, they HAD to be simultaneous, and if anything, God knew what He was going to decide BEFORE He did it. He absolutely had to know in concert with what He was deciding. I agree but I see that as a rather Calvinist position . The time of the election was before the man could have done anything good or evil. So God had to make the decision before or at the time of creation. That rules out an election based on mans choice of God.. God first had his plan and then He placed the elect and the non elect in position to bring that plan to pass. God does not respond to the acts of men , but rather the acts of men are ordained of God for His purposes. I think of this scripture Luk 14:28 For which of you, intending to build a tower, sitteth not down first, and counteth the cost, whether he have [sufficient] to finish [it]? What scripture does tell us is that God chose according to His own pleasure a remnant of men for His glory, not because the man made the correct choice..but rather that the man would be a tool in the hand of God
210 posted on 12/02/2003 3:42:20 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
excellent!
211 posted on 12/02/2003 3:46:53 PM PST by nobdysfool (All True Christians will be Calvinists in Glory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr
What good does hearing the Gospel do to the unregenerate? I makes the Gospel available to be understood by the unregenerate, setting up conditions for the call by the Father. If the unregenerate display faith in Him, then that faith is the beginning point for the unregenerate to return to God because the penalty of sin has already been paid, but out current state is still unregenerate.

The gospel is not heard or understood by the unregenerate. it is simply noise to them. They do not want to hear it , they refuse it,it offends them and their rejection of it condemns them to hell

Besides we still are to follow the Great Commission. What does the realization of one's sinful nature do for the unregenerate?

The unregenerate do not believe they are sinners . They do not "sin " they make "mistakes" and that does not matter because they are better than their neighbor , and they are just "good enough" to go to heaven ..or they laugh and say they want to be in hell with their friends ..laughing themselves to the flames by their disbelief of the power or-of God or His wrath at the sin of men

Why would an unregenerate person ask Jesus to come into his heart and make a new creature in him? Considering such a request is blasphemy, many might be tempted to ask that. Instead, they simply need to exercise faith for salvation provided by God.

Indeed faith to salvation is a gift of God..But it not "simply" because not all men have saving faith given to them by God. How do we know that ? Look around you. To exercise that faith the man would have to seek God and desire the gift..and as you see and the bible tells us that NONE seeketh after God

212 posted on 12/02/2003 3:56:02 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: xzins; Dr. Eckleburg
If God could have created the world differently (which He could have), then the world He did create is exactly as He wants it to be. Since this world is not through yet, then the eternal God could, because He is eternal/timeless, go back (our perspective) and make something be incorporated in the movie that hadn't yet been there.

This would violate His immutable nature.

Mal 3:6 For I [am] the LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed.

Num 23:19   God [is] not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do [it]? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good?

Jam 1:17   Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights, with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning.

Rev 1:8   I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty.

213 posted on 12/02/2003 4:03:41 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

Fru, there are over 300 "If-Then" statements in the bible which clearly show that God responds to what men do or say or pray. If the people of Tyre and Sidon had prayed for those miracles that Jesus mentioned, then God very well may have provided the miracles that Jesus spoke of. We don't know why the "if" was not done, nor do we know why the "then" was not done. Neverthless it is clear that Jesus was speaking of the range of infinite possibilities and exhibiting his prior foreknowledge of the events surronding what and why the judgment came upon Tyre and Sidon and why God did not intervene with miracles at that time.

If my granddaughter is hungry I will feed her.

I know she will be hungry , that is no mystery.

214 posted on 12/02/2003 4:05:55 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7; P-Marlowe
If God has ALWAYS been timeless, and has ALWAYS performed outside of time and sometimes inside of time, then it is no contradiction of His immutability for Him to act outside of time now.

It would simply mean that one characteristic of God that has not changed (immutable) is His acting outside of time.

Therefore, it is a true statement: "I am the Lord; I change not."
215 posted on 12/02/2003 4:08:24 PM PST by xzins (Proud to be Army!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: xzins
If God has ALWAYS been timeless, and has ALWAYS performed outside of time and sometimes inside of time,,b. then it is no contradiction of His immutability for Him to act outside of time now. It would simply mean that one characteristic of God that has not changed (immutable) is His acting outside of time.

But that is not what you said xzins

Here are your words

If God could have created the world differently (which He could have), then the world He did create is exactly as He wants it to be. Since this world is not through yet, then the eternal God could, because He is eternal/timeless, go back (our perspective) and make something be incorporated in the movie that hadn't yet been there.

That is God changing His mind before the end of the book Steve. It requires God to go and change something that he has already ordained, and a violation of Scripture as well as the nature of God

Isa 46:10 Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times [the things] that are not [yet] done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure:

Act 15:18   Known unto God are all his works from the beginning of the world.

Hbr 6:17   Wherein God, willing more abundantly to shew unto the heirs of promise the immutability of his counsel, confirmed [it] by an oath:

216 posted on 12/02/2003 4:28:00 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7; P-Marlowe
Not if outside time means what I think it means.

It is always as from the real beginning because He did institute it at the real beginning.

God can be at any point in time because he is outside time.

Therefore, it has always been from the beginning. We are the ones who try to constrain God within the strictures of time.
217 posted on 12/02/2003 4:39:11 PM PST by xzins (Proud to be Army!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: xzins
It seems that some people are constrained to insist that God does not make any decisions NOW. That all decisions were made BACK THEN.

But what needs to be realized is that if God inhabits eternity, then any decision that God makes NOW, he literally and actually made even before the foundation of the earth, because he is there NOW.

Thefore God can interact with us in time (now), while at the same time maintaining his eternal immutability and behold he changes not. Nothing has changed, even from the foundation of the earth.

218 posted on 12/02/2003 4:53:40 PM PST by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
God can make decisions!

Awesome thought!

219 posted on 12/02/2003 5:34:43 PM PST by xzins (Proud to be Army!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: xzins
God can make decisions!

He did, He does, and He will. And he knew, knows and will know what those decisions were, are and will be.

220 posted on 12/02/2003 6:16:13 PM PST by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 581-585 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson