Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pope Again Reaches Out to Orthodox Church
Herald Tribune ^ | June 30, 2003

Posted on 06/30/2003 2:53:51 PM PDT by NYer

VATICAN CITY Pope John Paul II again reached out to the Orthodox Church on Sunday, saying his efforts at reconciliation weren't just "ecclesiastic courtesy" but a sign of his profound desire to unite the Orthodox and Roman Catholic churches.

John Paul made the comments during his regular appearance to pilgrims and tourists in St. Peter's Square. Later Sunday, he welcomed a delegation from the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople at a traditional Mass marking the feast day of St. Peter and St. Paul.

"The exchange of delegations between Rome and Constantinople, for the respective patron feasts, goes beyond just an act of ecclesiastic courtesy," the pontiff said. "It reflects the profound and rooted intention to re-establish the full communion between East and West."

John Paul has made improving relations with the Orthodox Church a hallmark of his nearly 25-year papacy, visiting several mostly Orthodox countries and expressing regret for the wrongs committed by the Catholic Church against Orthodox Christians.

Despite his efforts at healing the 1,000-year-old schism, he hasn't yet visited Russia because of objections from the Russian Orthodox Church.

During the Mass on Sunday, 42 new archbishops received the pallium, a band of white wool decorated with black crosses that symbolizes their bond with the Vatican. Two of the archbishops received the pallium in their home parishes; the rest took part in the Mass in St. Peter's Basilica.


TOPICS: Activism; Apologetics; Catholic; Current Events; Ecumenism; General Discusssion; History; Ministry/Outreach; Orthodox Christian; Religion & Culture; Theology; Worship
KEYWORDS: catholic; ecumenism; orthodox; pope; vatican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640641-660661-680 ... 741-752 next last
To: MarMema
It's sad that the Catholic Church spawned the likes of you.


641 posted on 07/09/2003 5:40:27 PM PDT by JesseShurun (The Hazzardous Duke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 637 | View Replies]

To: St.Chuck; Ex-Wretch
Hey, you know what? The Catholic church spawned the likes of me, too! I just remembered...right through high school, after which I ran from anything resembling religion as fast as I could. And stayed away for quite some time....but then you know the ending to this story, right?

Guess that makes me prime fuel for the fire....

642 posted on 07/09/2003 5:58:57 PM PDT by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 636 | View Replies]

To: JesseShurun
LOL, Jess.
643 posted on 07/09/2003 6:00:22 PM PDT by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 641 | View Replies]

To: Hermann the Cherusker; MarMema; RnMomof7; RussianConservative; OrthodoxPresbyterian; FormerLib
I don't think there was anything morally wrong with the burnings of the middle ages by the Catholic Church...

No, your church never does, contrary to the squeaky little apologies they emit when confronted with the truth by civilized people.

Funny, though, how the pope only apologizes to those who are long dead and whose Roman persecutors are safely in their graves. This is why he won't apologize to the Serbian Orthodox for Rome's murder of two million Serbs under an Ustashe Catholic genocide so brutal that even the Nazis were appalled by them. Many of the victims and their persecutors are still living so he'll ignore them and continue with his little fake apologies to those dead for many centuries. Except for making a saint of a viciously insane Ustashe killer at just the right time to encourage the resurgence of the Ustashe under Rome's banner. Maybe John-Paul's hoping to finish them all off before he goes to his final reward.

One should keep firmly in mind that the Inquisition was aimed squarely at correcting wayward Catholics, not the faithful of other religions.

Certainly this does not address the central issues in the Spanish Inquisition. A substantial number of those burned were Jews who had been forcibly converted to Romanism (if not killed outright). They were tortured and burned for showing the least sign of observing any portion of their Jewish traditions. Or upon mere suspicion or idle accusation of Jewish practice. But then, you are technically correct: since Rome forcibly baptized them, they were Catholics and were being "corrected" by the Roman bonfires.

And some people think Rome doesn't have a sense of humor.
644 posted on 07/09/2003 6:35:35 PM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 609 | View Replies]

To: Hermann the Cherusker
Hernmann: You are a FRUITCAKE...and that is the nicest thing I can say about you. You can gloss over the facts all you want. The Latins have murdered more people in the name of religon than can ever be atoned for.

It amazes me that you can be so smug about your warped belief.

I am washing my hands of you.
645 posted on 07/09/2003 6:42:22 PM PDT by TexConfederate1861 ("One cannot have God as his father who does not have Holy church as his mother"...St Cyril)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 609 | View Replies]

To: Hermann the Cherusker
One should keep firmly in mind that the Inquisition was aimed squarely at correcting wayward Catholics, not the faithful of other religions. Once the Protestant settlement ocurred in the mid-1500's after the Wars of Religion were finished, the Inqusition was no longer aimed at those men, since they were no longer rebels against the established order, nor had they left the Catholic Church anymore, but rather they were never a part of it from the beginning. Similarly in England with Catholics after the settlement of 1688.

The curses still stand as church doctrine

"If anyone says that justifying faith is nothing else than confidence in divine mercy, which remits sins for Christ’s sake, let him be anathema" (Canon 12, Council of Trent).

"If anyone says that after the reception of the grace of justification the guilt is so remitted and the debt of eternal punishment so blotted out that no debt of temporal punishment remains...let him be anathema (Canon 30, Council of Trent).

646 posted on 07/09/2003 7:09:44 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 609 | View Replies]

To: Hermann the Cherusker; Admin Moderator; Sidebar Moderator
I've repeatedly and politely asked you not to ping me. Stop it.
647 posted on 07/09/2003 7:35:01 PM PDT by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 609 | View Replies]

To: MarMema
I'll try to get back to you tomorrow or the next day. I made the assertion publicly, and I may as well try to explain where I'm coming from on this publicly.
648 posted on 07/09/2003 7:36:27 PM PDT by Aliska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 633 | View Replies]

To: MarMema
....but then you know the ending to this story, right?

What, you married someone Orthodox?

649 posted on 07/09/2003 7:37:16 PM PDT by St.Chuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 642 | View Replies]

To: MarMema
Archbishop Stepanic did not approve of massacres.

Stepinac just couldn't be bothered to condemn them. But at least his "conscience was clear!"

650 posted on 07/09/2003 9:36:14 PM PDT by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 610 | View Replies]

To: St.Chuck
What, you married someone Orthodox?

No, I converted.

651 posted on 07/09/2003 9:54:45 PM PDT by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 649 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib
From some of the documents on Pavelic Papers and from pics on other sites, it is very difficult to believe he had no knowledge of what was happening. I am glad God is all-knowing and can do the judging.
652 posted on 07/09/2003 9:56:57 PM PDT by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 650 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush; MarMema
This is why he won't apologize to the Serbian Orthodox for Rome's murder of two million Serbs under an Ustashe Catholic genocide so brutal that even the Nazis were appalled by them.

I'll add my two cents to this discussion as soon as I am able. But that said, FWIW, neither will our own US Government "apologize to the Serbs".

Although our own "genocide" against the Serbs was rather paltry by comparison -- we "did our best" to limit "civilian casualties", as much as you can "limit" civilian casualties when you drop 2,000-pound bombs on Orthodox Serbs who were after all (and I say so without pardoning in any way the inhumane brutalities of Warfare), responding to anti-Serb homicide raids by the Albanian Kosovar Drug Mafia.

All the same, I have to say... whether Hitler or Clinton, whether 1941 or 1999, the Western Nations seem to have acquired a nasty and deplorable habit of ordering the carpet-bombing of Serbia on Palm Sunday, of all days.

Hitler can scarcely earn a lower place in Hell; the bottom floor is reserved for Stalin and Satan alone. But Clinton must have at least taken himself down a few notches by that particular Willful Repetition of History, this time around as both Tragedy and Farce.

If memory serves, GWB, I believe your one-time electoral Preference was a Mr. Patrick J. Buchanan. And if memory serves, Mr. Buchanan always opposed the NATO assault on the Serbs.

A position morally superior to both his fellow "Catholic" Ustashe, and our own Department of War ("Defense" is simply the wrong term, in this case).

Would I ever vote for him? No. I'm a Libertarian. But Buchanan definitely had (and has) his good points.

653 posted on 07/09/2003 10:28:41 PM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian (We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done our Duty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 644 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Trust me, the Serbs that I know realize who is responsible for what we did to them.

They do not hold a grudge against the United States.

But if we ever get within spitting distance of Bubba or Hitlery, it's going to make the nightly news! ;-)

654 posted on 07/09/2003 10:32:01 PM PDT by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 653 | View Replies]

To: MarMema
... it is very difficult to believe he had no knowledge of what was happening.

Indeed, no thinking person could hold that position.

And I've never met one who did.

655 posted on 07/09/2003 10:35:27 PM PDT by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 652 | View Replies]

To: Hermann the Cherusker
Stop pinging FormerLib. Thank you.
656 posted on 07/09/2003 10:40:34 PM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 609 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib; MarMema; George W. Bush
Trust me, the Serbs that I know realize who is responsible for what we did to them. They do not hold a grudge against the United States.

I actually have no doubt whatsoever that your statement is entirely correct. If Orthodoxy is "the Religion of Love" as Marmema claims (vis-a-vis the "Law" of Rome and the "Faith" of Protestantism), this is certainly proved by the apparently unconditional Serbian love for America.

Considering that the USA sold them out to Tito's Communism in 1944, and then proceeded to carpet-bomb them throughout the 1990's, I'm beginning to think that the Serbs are gluttons for American Punishment.

Given their historical record, I suspect that the average Serb would respond to a Home-Invader by shooting the bastard and then chambering another round. Unless, of course, the Invader was an American. In which case, judging by their historical record, the Serbs would lay down their arms, forgive the incineration of their 1,000-year old church, and say a Prayer for our children -- even as we were shooting theirs.

The 1990's demonization of Serbia by the West is utterly Unforgivable. The still-unquenched love of America by the Serbs in frankly Inexplicable.

Some things just don't make a whole lot of sense to me.

But they are what they are.

657 posted on 07/09/2003 10:51:44 PM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian (We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done our Duty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 654 | View Replies]

To: MarMema
No, I converted.

So how did you come to the Orthodox church? You became irreligious after high school, and then acquired a thirst for God. Orthodox converts aren't very common, well, to me anyway. Lots of cradle catholics become protestants, or apostasize before rediscovering Catholicism, but converting to orthodoxy is kinda rare. What led you East? :o)

658 posted on 07/09/2003 10:53:10 PM PDT by St.Chuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 651 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
The still-unquenched love of America by the Serbs in frankly Inexplicable.

A lot of it has to do with Serbs living in the United States. The fact that very few of our Churches are destroyed here (only 3 were desecrated during the Clinton years).

Many American dollars have flowed into Serbia attempting to repair the damage that was done. The Serbs realize that Clinton was a horrible aberration in this nation's history. We should all pray that our fellow Americans come to this realization as well!

659 posted on 07/09/2003 11:05:02 PM PDT by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 657 | View Replies]

To: St.Chuck
Orthodox converts aren't very common, well, to me anyway.

At least you acknowledge the shortcomings of your experience! Actually, the majority of the converts to Orthodoxy come from the Roman Church.

660 posted on 07/09/2003 11:07:53 PM PDT by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 658 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640641-660661-680 ... 741-752 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson