Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Whistle-Blower Priest in Trouble With Diocese
WJLA ABC 7 ^ | Dec 2, 2002 | WJLA ABC 7

Posted on 12/04/2002 7:07:41 PM PST by Maximilian

Whistle-Blower Priest in Trouble With Diocese

Arlington, Va. (AP) - A priest who exposed sexual misconduct of fellow clergy members at three northern Virginia parishes is facing unspecified charges within the Catholic church that supporters fear could lead to his defrocking.

Meanwhile, a national conservative Catholic group is rallying to support the priest, James R. Haley. They say Haley, who has been on leave for a year, should be rewarded rather than punished for his actions and blame Arlington Bishop Paul Loverde for his treatment of Haley.

"Father Haley is being punished for exposing corruption," said Stephen Brady, president of Roman Catholic Faithful. "It's clear that the church hierarchy in this country is in meltdown. A bishop can do practically anything and remain in good standing. Meanwhile a priest blows the whistle, and he's persecuted."

Three different priests have been punished by the church for misconduct exposed in large part by Haley. William J. Erbacher resigned as pastor of St. Lawrence's in Franconia after an investigation revealed he stole from church collection plates and maintained a stash of gay pornography. Haley also exposed an affair between a married woman and the Rev. Daniel Verrecchia, who at the time was pastor of All Saints Catholic Church in Manassas. Verrecchia has since left the priesthood to marry the woman.

In September, the pastor of St. Mary's Parish in Fredericksburg, Daniel E. Hamilton, resigned following accusations that he kept a collection of gay pornography in his rectory bedroom.

Many of these allegations were made public in a 200-page deposition given by Haley in a civil lawsuit by Jim Lambert, the ex-husband of the woman who subsequently married Verrecchia. Lambert claimed the church covered up knowledge of the affair between Verrecchia and Nancy Lambert. A judge dismissed that lawsuit earlier this year.

Church officials sought unsuccessfully to have the deposition sealed. Roman Catholic Faithful has since posted the deposition on its Web site.

Loverde had been scheduled to meet with Haley on Monday and discuss the charges that have been levied against Haley. But that meeting was canceled because of a scheduling conflict, said diocese spokeswoman Linda Shovlain.

She said she could not discuss the charges against Haley, but said canon law provides Haley due process protections and that any serious disciplinary measures would have to be taken by Rome, not by Loverde. She would not comment on whether the allegations are serious enough to force Haley out of the priesthood.

Documents that the diocese has already provided to Haley indicate they are seeking to punish him for testifying in the deposition. They say he violated a previous order that "was issued in order to avoid scandal, to maintain ecclesiastical discipline and to protect the reputation and privacy of both the faithful and priests of this diocese."

Haley is receiving a stipend of about $2,000 a month and full health-care benefits while on a voluntary "period of discernment," Shovlain said. Haley said in his deposition that the discernment leave was forced upon him.

"There are a lot of suggestions that (the) Bishop is retaliating against Father Haley for bringing this information forward, but that's just not true," she said.

She did say, though, that Loverde told Haley that he should not make any allegations against priests publicly because those priests have due process and privacy rights when an accusation is levied and then investigated.

Haley and the diocese differ over whether he was required to give the 200-page deposition. In the deposition, Haley "brings up a lot of issues that are unsubstantiated," Shovlain said.

Haley says in the deposition that he was so overwhelmed by the amount of homosexual activity in the priesthood that he sought counseling. He accuses specific priests, and says Loverde stonewalled him when he provided evidence of impropriety.

Haley's lawyer, Gregory Murphy, said the charges against Haley revolve exclusively around the fact that Haley gave the deposition in the Lambert case. And he said there's no doubt that Haley was under subpoena, because Murphy himself, who was also Lambert's lawyer, issued the subpoena.

"This is a total betrayal," Murphy said. "You have a priest who did the moral thing, the right thing, and what they want to do is kill the messenger."

Murphy also said the diocese is being disingenuous by saying Haley is on voluntary leave.

"He has made it very clear he wants to be practicing," Murphy said.

Loverde disputed the notion that he has been unwilling to discipline priests who engage in homosexual activity.

"I expect every priest to live a virtuous life in keeping with his sacred calling, including his commitment to celibacy and chastity," Loverde said.

About 50 Haley supporters rallied Monday outside the diocese headquarters. They did not believe church officials who said Haley is not being punished for blowing the whistle on corruption and homosexual activity.

"When other priests find out what's happened to Father Haley, they are not going to come forward because they don't want to lose their parish. They don't want to live out of a trailer," said Gloria Kukler of Fairfax.

Haley's supporters said he is living in a trailer home because he has no parish rectory as a home; Shovlain said she did not know if that was true.

Parishioners who know Haley described him as intense and dedicated.

"When he consecrated the Sacrament, his voice would just tremble with emotion," said Nina Burke of Fredericksburg, a worshipper at St. Mary's where Haley was last assigned. "We were bitterly sorry to have lost him."

Haley has been prohibited by the diocese from speaking about the case, Murphy said.


TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; Ministry/Outreach; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: arlington; catholiclist; coverup; loverde; sodomy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 12/04/2002 7:07:41 PM PST by Maximilian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Diago; narses; Loyalist; BlackElk; american colleen; saradippity; Polycarp; Dajjal; ...
Bishop Loverde didn't show up for his meeting with Fr. Haley. But the protest by Roman Catholic Faithful went on anyway. It was covered in the Washington Post, Washington Times and local TV. This report is from the TV station.

Here is the link to see the video. It's very good and it shows that the station led off with this as the top story.

http://www.wjla.com/news/stories/1202/64916.html

Here is the Washington Times article which has a good deal of additional information:

http://washtimes.com/metro/20021203-545592.htm

Here is the Roman Catholic Faithful website with additional links:

http://www.rcf.org/

This is getting so much publicity that Loverde has got to be feeling the heat. These bishops, however, have no sense of shame. They've learned their lessons well from ex-Pres Clinton, "As long as you don't resign, there's nothing they can do about it. It's always better to stay in power, because once you lose your power, you lose the ability to cover up your crimes."

2 posted on 12/04/2002 7:16:56 PM PST by Maximilian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: Maximilian
By their fruits you will know them.
4 posted on 12/04/2002 7:32:08 PM PST by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio
Why is that EVERY piece of your fruit is either bitter or sour?
5 posted on 12/04/2002 7:37:15 PM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
Loverde's failure to show up speaks volumes. Truly pitiful.

Maximilian, for the links, ago gratias tibi!

Bernadette.

6 posted on 12/04/2002 7:37:26 PM PST by Siobhan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: smevin
Ultima's fruit is bitter or sour even when it has nothing to do with fruity priests. Its just who he is.
8 posted on 12/04/2002 7:57:41 PM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: Maximilian
I'm glad this is getting some publicity. The bishop may not be shamed into doing the right thing, but it may at least teach him not to do it again. Many bishops tend to take the path of least resistance. They go with the liberals because they liberals are so good at making trouble if they don't. If they find that orthodox Catholics can make it just as hot for them as the dissenters, it may alter their future behavior.
11 posted on 12/04/2002 8:21:16 PM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
Forget Clinton and keep up the pressure on this bishop. I heard that there are other priests who know what is going on. Pump them for information and promise them they won't have to come forward until it is safe. Of Course, among them may be saints.
12 posted on 12/04/2002 8:49:56 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sandyeggo
I will tell her that she is missed. Hers is a mighty spirit, and she will return here in time.

Our sister Mary Rose will be arriving on Friday to spend a week with Siobhan and the family here, and I will be returning home on Monday.

God bless,
Bernadette.

13 posted on 12/04/2002 9:04:21 PM PST by Siobhan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
Stick to the issue and leave me out of it. The false prophets are those who produce the crap you read about in the papers every day.
14 posted on 12/04/2002 9:46:47 PM PST by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
Bumping for Father Haley and the truth.
15 posted on 12/05/2002 12:05:44 AM PST by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ultima ratio
Ultima,

It was YOU who inserted your ever-sour, ever-bitter fruit into this thread.


16 posted on 12/05/2002 6:17:47 AM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian; Militis Dei; nina0113
personally, we've stopped contributing to our parish since most of the money seems to go to the diocese. (I've also encouraged others to do the same). We've just increased our donations to other faithful and mostly local organizations.
I love our Parish and our current priests but until I see a budget on where our parish funds are spent I will continue this course.
Please keep me on your ping list - I'm very interested in how this goes...

God Bless.
17 posted on 12/05/2002 6:20:05 AM PST by MudPuppy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Maximilian
bump
18 posted on 12/05/2002 6:51:49 AM PST by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sandyeggo
<> Amen, sister, dittoes<>
19 posted on 12/05/2002 6:54:16 AM PST by Catholicguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Siobhan
Dear Bernadette,

We all miss Siobhan. Tell her "hi" from sitetest, and that we have the whole family remembering her and her family during the Rosary.

Thanks,


sitetest
20 posted on 12/05/2002 6:58:38 AM PST by sitetest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson