Posted on 01/03/2002 11:19:13 AM PST by ArGee
Digital IS analog!
(You've got to have a real good d/a and comparator first: all analog.)
Behind the crusades and the inquisitions lies man's greed. They would have occured with or without the worship of God. Hitler wanted to wipe out all who were different from him, and he worshipped no one but himself. Much evil has been done in the name of religion, belief in God is not the cause of this, man is.
Sorry if I have ruffled your feathers wrongly.
Amazing how terrible disasters eventually befall countries that practice slavery. Look at the U.S. Civil War, for example. Or if you don't care for that example, how about WW2? Hiroshima? Was the U.S. immoral for dropping the atomic bomb? The consequences of a society's ills are inflicted on the children, God or no god; fair or unfair.
I read that God inflicts all manner of painful and horrific diseases on his faithful servant Job, in a bet with the devil.
Assuming Job wasn't in on it....
I read that God floods the entire world, killing all of the innocent children, because he thinks none of them are worthy of living.
Actually, the implication of Noah is that there were no innocent children among those killed.
I read that God demands that Abraham kill his firstborn son, as demonstration of his devotion.
Which I've covered.
We can argue which interpretation is right and which is wrong.... You'll say I'm imposing my beliefs on the writing; I'll say you are; and we'll both be right.
Great comment! Those doctrinally-asleep pastors are actually describing the planting of tares!
And God will finish it later. In the parable, He says "Leave the tares alone. I fully intend to burn these hypocrites."
OOOOPS.
That IS what I said, but in practice you get a higher effective resolution by doing a conversion from analog to digital encoding for non-volatile storage than not doing the conversion. In other words, the analog circuitry in the conversion process supports a much higher resolution than an analog recording medium.
Sorry if I have ruffled your feathers wrongly.
Thank you. I'm glad you can see how bad I take any comparison to that evil doer! :-)
PROBABLY? For the only issue which transcends the proverbial "matter of life or death", a probably (for me, at least) does'nt feed the bulldog.
you have to add that, just for curiousity, the disbelievers went to the banquet site, but didn't see any banquet
Actually, when I was a disbeliever, I saw the people waiting in line and laughed at them. Then I came up with a lot of flawed reasoning to support my belief of how stupid people could be to pin their hopes on the writings of goat herders, fishermen, and tent makers, not to mention the interpretations of those writings by televised snake oil hustlers.
But, I never REALLY, HONESTLY sought out the guy putting on the event for his input.
others who believed in the banquet kept disappearing thinking that they were going to the banquet
Here's a news flash; we ALL "disappear".
But they never returned and no one really knew (except by faith) that the banquet ever happened.
Not quite right. One man did come back in widely reported historical event. This historical event is mentioned in more non-biblical ancient texts than is the historical event of the assasination of Julius Ceasar. What's more, is that several of his closest followers went willingly to their deaths for the "crime" of reporting what they saw; they could have avoided some very painful deaths just by copping to their "lie". But they did'nt. They knew what was waiting for them. And as they stood at the very entrance to the banquet hall, being eaten by lions, being burned alive, being killed by having rocks thrown at them, or being crucified; they asked the "banquet organizer" to forgive their killers, and thanked the "banquet organizer" for everything they had been allowed to do (including being killed for His sake).
Except to the person who experienced it directly.
Except to the person who experienced it directly.
Wrong again. If only one person can experience something, it is not reproducable nor is it falsifiable, hence it is unverifiable.
There is no exception here. The experience is unverified, ergo, it is not submitable as evidence.
At least were talking, huh! If there is enough charity between us then maybe we could continue a conversation as some lenght.
I fully agree. I just maintain that the seeking has to be earnest, or it is not to be regarded as seeking at all.
In Jeremiah, the Lord says "You shall seek Me and you shall find Me on the day that you shall seek Me with your whole heart." The Lord seems to be saying that the only kind of seeking which is real seeking is the whole-hearted kind.
This explains Jesus' warning in Luke 13 about agonizing to make it through the narrow doorway of true conversion.
Perhaps even more important, the statement found in Jeremiah fits beautifully with Romans 3:11. Paul really does believe that less-than-wholehearted seeking counts for nothing at all.
The whole picture is wonderful.
Shalom.
As well you should. But Jesus was trying to make a different point, and speaking to a different audience. I was not trying to reword His parable. That would be too great a task for me.
Shalom.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.