Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pope Leo XIV honors Harvard scientist whose pursuit of knowledge led her to faith Karin Öberg holds the Thomas Dudley Cabot Chair in the Natural Sciences at Harvard University
EWTN ^ | 1st October 2026 | Diego Lopez Marina

Posted on 10/03/2026 11:30:36 PM PDT by Cronos

Pope Leo XIV presented the Pius XI Medal to Karin Öberg, a Harvard scientist specializing in astrochemistry, during a recent audience with members of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences.

The award, presented on Sept. 24, recognizes scientists under the age of 45 who have distinguished themselves through their research and show “exceptional promise” in their field.

Öberg has spoken publicly about her conversion to Catholicism and how her pursuit of knowledge influenced her journey toward faith.

In a 2011 interview with the Augustine Institute, she explained that there were aspects of the world that began to make it difficult for her to accept a strictly materialist worldview.

“There were certain facts about the world that made me very skeptical of atheism or pure materialism. I thought it was pretty obvious there is moral realism in this world, that there are things that are good and evil, regardless of what people think about them,” she noted.

Reading C.S. Lewis’ “Mere Christianity” played an important role in that process. As she explained, the British writer’s proposal seemed reasonable to her.

“His explanation of Christianity struck me as very sensible, and it seemed to fit with the data about the world I had already gathered,” she stated.

For Öberg, however, intellectually accepting the faith was not the end of the journey. “What took time was the aspect of charity — living out the faith and truly building a relationship with God,” she explained.

The scientist has also reflected on the limits and scope of the scientific method when it comes to God. She was clear in that interview: “You can never use the scientific method to prove or disprove God.”

The scientist has also reflected on the limits and scope of the scientific method when it comes to God. She was clear in that interview: “You can never use the scientific method to prove or disprove God.”

In her view, science does allow us to appreciate something she considers especially significant: “how intelligible the universe is, how subject to laws it is.” She added: “This cannot be taken for granted. It is magnificent.”

The beauty of the universe also plays an important role in her understanding of the relationship between science and faith. “I am moved. And beauty is, in a sense, just as impressive to me,” she said.

For this reason, Öberg said she believes that science and faith need not be presented as opposing paths.

The scientist has also spoken openly about being Catholic.

“I am very open about the fact that I am Catholic,” she said in the interview. At the same time, she explained that she prefers this openness to foster dialogue rather than lead to imposition.

“I try to be open and then invite people to come and talk to me, rather than preaching to them,” she noted.

Öberg has also expressed a special affinity for the Dominican tradition and for St. Thomas Aquinas, whom she cited as a particularly important figure for the way he united faith and reason.


TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events
KEYWORDS: morepopenews
The scientist has also reflected on the limits and scope of the scientific method when it comes to God. She was clear in that interview: “You can never use the scientific method to prove or disprove God.”

In her view, science does allow us to appreciate something she considers especially significant: “how intelligible the universe is, how subject to laws it is.” She added: “This cannot be taken for granted. It is magnificent.”

1 posted on 10/03/2026 11:30:36 PM PDT by Cronos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cronos

“I try to be open and then invite people to come and talk to me, rather than preaching to them,” - very valuable! A conversation is listening and reflecting, responding if necessary.
Too few conversations today.


2 posted on 10/04/2026 5:10:22 AM PDT by SavannahWonderer (First do no harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Russian Orthodox adherent, Igor Sikorsky, wrote a deeply reflective book in 1942, entitled “The Message of the Lord’s Prayer” (read it on Amazon).

As a pioneer of aviation and the inventor of the modern helicopter, Sikorsky approached the prayer not as a theologian, but with an engineer’s precision and a seeker’s spiritual insight.

His core arguments and insights about the prayer include:

• Universal and Timeless Structure: Sikorsky noted that the sixty-six words of the prayer are simple enough for a child to memorize, yet their meaning expands into vast immensity upon closer analysis.

He marveled at how the core concepts—such as father, kingdom, free will, bread, and temptation—retain their exact, uncompromised meanings across centuries, cultures, and translations.

• Mathematical Symmetry: He analyzed the prayer as having the beautiful symmetry of a finished mathematical formula. He organized it into two distinct halves (each containing three main petitions) framed by an address and a conclusion:

• The First Triad: Focused on the eternal, divine order and the ultimate spiritual destiny of mankind (”Hallowed be Thy name,” “Thy kingdom come,” “Thy will be done”).

• The Second Triad: Focused on the immediate material and spiritual needs of the present earthly life (”Give us this day our daily bread,” “Forgive us our debts,” “Lead us not into temptation”).

• Dual Meaning of “Daily Bread”: Sikorsky emphasized that “daily bread” encompasses both our immediate physical sustenance on Earth and the spiritual nourishment required to sustain the human soul.

• A Weapon Against Evil: Writing during the dark days of World War II and having personally fled the violent Bolshevik revolution in Russia, Sikorsky viewed the final petitions for forgiveness and deliverance from evil as essential spiritual defenses for protecting the individual soul against the broader, overwhelming forces of worldly despair and tyranny.

Sikorsky treated The Lord’s Prayer as a comprehensive standard and guide given to Christians by Christ.


3 posted on 10/04/2026 5:28:06 AM PDT by Liz (“The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies the work of His hands. " (Psalm 19:1))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

4 posted on 10/04/2026 6:11:31 AM PDT by Liz (“The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies the work of His hands. " (Psalm 19:1))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Great article. Very inspiring. One small additional point: The medal itself is not related to her finding faith through science; the medal is for science period. She would have won it anyway even if she were a protestant or atheist.

About 85 to 90 percent of the recipients of this medal were not Catholics.


5 posted on 10/04/2026 9:49:47 AM PDT by edwinland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cronos; lightman

What about those over 45?

And what about scientists who became Orthodox Christians?

AI Overview
Several notable scientists and academics transitioned deeply into the Eastern Orthodox faith, with some leaving scientific careers entirely to become monastics or clergy.

• Hieromonk Athenagoras earned a Doctor of Physics from Stanford University specializing in condensed matter physics before leaving his research career in the United States to enter the Monastery of Saint George in Crete, where he was tonsured a monk.

• Father Gleb Kaleda was a prominent Soviet geologist and mineralogist who secretly maintained his faith and was ordained an underground Orthodox priest during the Soviet era before publicly serving later in life.

• Jeremy Krieg worked as a software engineer and scientist with a background in electrical engineering and mathematical physics before converting to Eastern Orthodoxy and later being ordained to the priesthood in Australia. Good Shepherd Orthodox Church

• Theodosius Dobzhansky was a renowned Ukrainian-American evolutionary biologist and geneticist deeply influenced by Russian Orthodox culture who viewed evolution as a mechanism of ongoing divine creation. Public Orthodoxy +1

• Bishop Ignatios (formerly active in hemodynamics and biomedical research with academic stints at Harvard and MIT) turned his focus to theology and bioethics, eventually taking monastic vows on Mount Athos and becoming a metropolitan bishop in the Greek Orthodox Church


6 posted on 10/04/2026 10:59:25 AM PDT by Honorary Serb (Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Thanks so much for the post about Sikorsky.


7 posted on 10/04/2026 2:11:01 PM PDT by married21 (As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: married21

y/v/w


8 posted on 10/04/2026 2:18:52 PM PDT by Liz (“The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies the work of His hands. " (Psalm 19:1))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Karin Öberg is a brilliant Swedish and Harvard astronomer who loves St. Thomas and the Catholic Church. Good news. She is assisting others to appreciate St. Thomas.


9 posted on 10/04/2026 2:34:37 PM PDT by Falconspeed ("Keep your fears to yourself, but share your courage with others." Robert Louis Stevenson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Honorary Serb; edwinland; lightman

Honorary serb: “What about those over 45?”

This award is for those under 45. There are other awards for other folks

Honorary serb: “And what about scientists who became Orthodox Christians?”

As edwinland wrote above your comment “ The medal itself is not related to her finding faith through science; the medal is for science period. She would have won it anyway even if she were a protestant or atheist.

About 85 to 90 percent of the recipients of this medal were not Catholics”


10 posted on 10/05/2026 3:22:28 AM PDT by Cronos (Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Honorary Serb

The author of the article is trying to be nice and complimentary to her (because he is also Catholic) but he does her a disservice by implying the award is for people who found Catholicism through science. It’s an award for the sceince period, and has been won by militant atheists.


11 posted on 10/05/2026 6:27:38 AM PDT by edwinland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
Yet this "spiritual" view she has been converted to still includes biological and cosmic evolution, and probably higher Biblical criticism as well.

This is why Fundamentalist Protestants will never become Catholics, Cronos. I may be the lone exception, and I had my eyes opened in spades.

12 posted on 10/05/2026 9:01:20 AM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (בראשית ברא אלקים את השמים ואת הארץ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Honorary Serb
Bishop Ignatios (formerly active in hemodynamics and biomedical research with academic stints at Harvard and MIT) turned his focus to theology and bioethics, eventually taking monastic vows on Mount Athos and becoming a metropolitan bishop in the Greek Orthodox Church

Yep, and he believes in evolution too.

Hey, maybe none of the stuff in the "new testament" happened either?

13 posted on 10/05/2026 9:03:53 AM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (בראשית ברא אלקים את השמים ואת הארץ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator

And you then rejected Christianity completely and became a Zionist.

why do you reject the divinity of Christ?


14 posted on 10/05/2026 9:11:17 AM PDT by Cronos (Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator; Honorary Serb; lightman
ZC, the belief system you ascribe to - Noahide - rests on three massive historical and theological illusions!

1. Your claim that Fundamentalist Protestants will "never become Catholic" because of evolution or higher criticism is demonstrably false. Thousands of fundamentalist and evangelical Protestants—including high-profile anti-evolution fundamentalists—convert to Catholicism every single year (e.g., Scott Hahn, Marcus Grodi, Francis Beckwith, Jimmy Akin).

Why? Because Catholic dogma (such as Pius XII’s Humani Generis and Catechism #283–284) permits Catholics to hold either Young Earth Creationism or guided evolution regarding the physical body, as long as one holds that God directly created the human soul. A fundamentalist is entirely free to be a Young Earth Creationist inside the Catholic Church.

2. Organized "Noahidism" Was Manufactured in the 1990s
You left Christianity for "Noahidism," believing you found an ancient alternative. While the Seven Laws of Noah are mentioned in the Talmud (Tractate Sanhedrin 56a) as basic universal moral prohibitions for non-Jews, "Noahidism" as a standalone, organized institutional "religion" with global councils, local congregations, and a distinct non-Jewish identity was created in the late 1980s and 1990s (fueled by Chabad-Lubavitch outreach, the 1990 Texas Noahide conference, and 1990s internet movements).

Mainstream Jewish rabbinics (Orthodox, Conservative, and Reform) do not recognize "Noahidism" as a standalone religion. It has no liturgy, no sacraments, no priesthood, and no institutional authority. Most traditional Jews view the modern Noahide movement as a recent 20th-century Western construct.

3. Classical Rabbinic Judaism Explicitly Rejects Your young earth Literalism
The ultimate irony is that you adopted "Noahidism" to defend a 6,000-year Young Earth Creationist (YEC) literal reading of Genesis—oblivious to the fact that strict literal YEC is a 19th-century Protestant invention that classical Jewish tradition explicitly rejected centuries ago!

The Irony is that You abandoned the ~2,000-year-old Apostolic Church to cling to a 19th-century view of Genesis, by joining an organized "Noahide religion" invented in the 1990s—all while claiming to follow a Jewish tradition whose greatest medieval sages (Maimonides, Rashi, Nachmanides) rejected your literalism long before Darwin was ever born!

15 posted on 10/05/2026 9:54:42 AM PDT by Cronos (Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator
ZC, It’s interesting that you warn me about "higher criticism" and "evolution" when your own spiritual journey has been a classic case of intellectual fence-sitting.

You’ve spent years wandering the perimeter of historical Christianity, rejecting the divinity of Christ, and standing at the doorstep of Rabbinic Judaism—only to settle for the in-between state of Noahidism - neither Jew nor Christian.

Let’s be honest about what Noahidism actually is: it’s an uncomfortable middle ground. It is neither the fullness of the Jewish Covenant (which belongs exclusively to Israel) nor the fullness of the New Covenant in Christ. It allows a person to admire the God of Abraham from a "safe" distance without having to bend the knee to the Incarnate Word, receive the Sacraments, or submit to Christ’s Church.

You are searching for absolute truth, historical continuity, and an uncompromised moral and theological foundation. But you won't find it in modern academic "higher criticism," nor will you find it in a Rabbinic compromise made for Gentiles who want to stand in the outer court.

Everything you are actually looking for—an authoritative teaching, the true Fulfillment of the Law and the Prophets, and direct communion with the Living God—is waiting for you right where Christ left it:

In the Catholic Church.

btw, you don't HAVE to accept either of what you said -- in Humani Generis (1950), Pope Pius XII stated that Catholics are entirely free to examine evolution as a scientific hypothesis regarding the origin of the human physical body from pre-existing matter. However, the Church dogmatically requires Catholics to believe that God directly created the human spiritual soul out of nothing (ex nihilo). That Adam and Eve were real, historical individuals (monogenism), from whom all humans descend and inherit original sin and that creation is an act of God's providence, not a blind, unguided material accident. A Catholic is completely free to be a literal young-earth creationist, an old-earth creationist, or to hold to theistic evolution. The Church defines no dogmatic biological timeline.

And the Church condemns modernistic, naturalistic higher criticism that denies miracles, rejects divine inspiration, or claims Sacred Scripture contains errors.

Stop sitting on the fence between. Come all the way home to the Church that Christ founded.

16 posted on 10/05/2026 10:27:14 AM PDT by Cronos (Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cronos; lightman

You’ve got to admit that there is a bias toward youth in the awards world!

The Fields Medal in math is an extreme example!

At least the recipients of the 2026 Nobel Prize in Medicine are all over 50!


17 posted on 10/05/2026 10:57:43 AM PDT by Honorary Serb (Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cronos; lightman

Boston-born Stanford scientist Karl Deisseroth wins Nobel Prize for brain-illuminating research

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbVt0EAM68k


18 posted on 10/05/2026 12:42:51 PM PDT by Honorary Serb (Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson