Posted on 07/06/2026 7:53:25 PM PDT by ebb tide
Since the Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX) consecrated four bishops without a papal mandate and the subsequent decree of excommunication by the Holy See, some Catholic bishops and a cardinal have said that the Vatican should rethink the restrictions of Traditionis Custodes, while at least one ordinary has promised to expand access to the Traditional Latin Mass (TLM) in his diocese.
Archbishop Georg Gänswein, who served as Pope Benedict XVI’s personal secretary, in an interview with the Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera, published on July 2, denounced the society’s July 1 consecrations but emphasized that the Church should now be more flexible in allowing priests to celebrate the Tridentine Mass.
Cardinal Kurt Koch, the prefect of the Dicastery for Promoting Christian Unity, said that the Church should rethink Traditionis Custodes to accommodate the faithful devoted to the Latin Mass who do not share the “ideology” of the SSPX.
In a July 3 diocesan statement, Bishop Fredrik Hansen of Oslo, Norway, called the consecrations “schismatic” but promised to continue allowing and even expanding access to the TLM in his diocese for the faithful devoted to the ancient liturgy.
During his interview, Archbishop Gänswein, who is currently the apostolic nuncio to the Baltic States, compared the SSPX to Protestants and lamented that the society did not respond more favorably to Pope Benedict’s outreach to the order back in 2009, which included lifting the excommunications of the four bishops consecrated by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre in 1988.
But, the archbishop highlighted that there are many clergy and faithful with a strong devotion to the TLM and expressed his desire for the Vatican to now be more “flexible” and “generous” in allowing its celebration.
READ: Cardinal Müller urges Vatican to rethink Latin Mass restrictions after SSPX consecrations
“There are faithful in the Church who celebrate using the (traditional) Latin rite—for example, the Fraternity of St. Peter (FSSP)—and they do so ‘cum Petro and sub Petro’: never against the pope,” he said. “Frankly speaking, I believe that Rome can now open up to the possibility of being more flexible, generous, and fatherly regarding the option of celebrating Mass in Latin.”
Gänswein further underscored the great spiritual fruit of Summorum Pontificum, noting that the liturgical peace that Pope Benedict’s motu proprio had fostered was destroyed by Traditionis Custodes and called for its reinstatement to restore that peace.
“Summorum Pontificum had borne fruit, as demonstrated by ten years of positive experiences. There had been abuses, it’s true, but … the fact that there were a few was not a good reason to prohibit the Tridentine Mass for everyone,” the archbishop said. “(If TC was abrogated) that liturgical peace, which has been damaged, would be restored.”
Cardinal Koch, during a podcast for the German edition of the Catholic journal Communio, translated by Rorate Caeli, similarly decried the society’s consecrations but argued that it would be “self-righteous” to condemn the SSPX while not also pondering “whether there are fundamental deficits in the Church today that are being recalled by the Society” and lamented that Traditionis Custodes “radically” curbed Pope Benedict’s attempt to build liturgical unity.
“First, I think of the unresolved question of the relationship between the two forms of the one Roman Rite, as Pope Benedict called it. Pope Benedict showed a path there; Pope Francis curbed it somewhat radically,” the prefect said. “I think we need to rethink this, especially for those faithful who feel drawn to this form of liturgy without sharing the entire ideological superstructure of the Society. For these faithful, I think we must look for new ways.”
WATCH: John-Henry Westen shares takeaways from his week with SSPX in Écône
Meanwhile, Bishop Hansen of Oslo, where the SSPX has a chapel, stressed the importance of remaining “in union” with the Holy See, assured the faithful that they would continue to have access to the TLM, and expressed openness to expanding access to the ancient Roman rite should the need arise.
“As your shepherd, I therefore offer you an exhortation and some words about the future. The exhortation is simple: Hold fast to unity with Our Holy Father, the Bishop of Rome, and with me as Bishop of Oslo,” the bishop wrote.
“As for the future: You wish to be able to participate in the liturgical celebration according to the 1962 Missal. Many of you also look to a spiritual expression and a spirituality characterized by the pre-conciliar liturgy. I understand this,” he added.
“Masses according to the 1962 Missal are celebrated every Sunday at St. Joseph Church in Oslo. This will continue. If there is a need for it and it will be for the good of the Church and of souls, I will also expand this type of Mass celebration in our local church.”
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
We can always ban it later
In 1988, we had the Ecclesia Dei commission and the FSSP as a result. Now we have new calls for more of the same.
Instead of closing the barn door after the horse escapes is kicked out of the stable; maybe Rome should consider keeping the faithful mare within her barn.
Ping
I mean, these TLMs that are increasing are both valid and licit, and no bishops were excommunicated in the process.
You never will. Your hatred blinds you.
Once again, the only times you post on the Religion Forum is to attack the SSPX.
Maybe one day, you'll acknowledge that your fortunate access to a TLM, which is rare these days, is solely due to Archbishop Lefebvre.
Except for the bishops who only celebrated the TLM. Can you name one bishop who exclusively celebrates the TLM with permission from Rome?
"Increasing" you claim?
Since Traditiones Custodes, all I've seen is a huge decrease in TLM's.
And there's been no indication that Francis 2.0 will revoke that moto propio, nor Amoris Laetitia, nor Fiducia Supplicans.
Arrogant and offensive question. What faithful Catholics would consider invalid "excommunications" and declarations of "schism" as "good news".
On the contrary, you obviously consider the "excommunications" to be good news. You have been attacking them long before now.
It's quite rare to see Catholics celebrating excommunications, but you and oystir, are exceptions.
It seems that so long as Christ is honored, it wouldn't matter what language it is done in. Latin (a very beautiful language for the service, it was in the few times I've seen mass), local languages, whatever.
It's almost like the pope and others are ashamed of using Latin. What is this about? Would appreciate anything you could educate a fellow Christian with.
I just realized that I did not capitalize the word "Mass" in my previous post. No disrespect was intended. I shall resolve to be mindful of that going forward.
No problems.
God bless you.
And may He bless you also friend :-)
Christ is King.
Prayers for the SSPX.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.